Minimal Ablative Margin Quantification Using Hepatic Arterial Versus Portal Venous Phase CT for Colorectal Metastases Segmentation: A Dual-center, Retrospective Analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Noreen S Siddiqi, Yuan-Mao Lin, Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva, Gregor Laimer, Peter Schullian, Yannick Scharll, Alexandra M Dunker, Caleb S O'Connor, Kyle A Jones, Kristy K Brock, Reto Bale, Bruno C Odisio, Iwan Paolucci
{"title":"Minimal Ablative Margin Quantification Using Hepatic Arterial Versus Portal Venous Phase CT for Colorectal Metastases Segmentation: A Dual-center, Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Noreen S Siddiqi, Yuan-Mao Lin, Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva, Gregor Laimer, Peter Schullian, Yannick Scharll, Alexandra M Dunker, Caleb S O'Connor, Kyle A Jones, Kristy K Brock, Reto Bale, Bruno C Odisio, Iwan Paolucci","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the predictive value of minimal ablative margin (MAM) quantification using tumor segmentation on intraprocedural contrast-enhanced hepatic arterial (HAP) versus portal venous phase (PVP) CT on local outcomes following percutaneous thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This dual-center retrospective study included patients undergoing thermal ablation of CRLM with intraprocedural preablation and postablation contrast-enhanced CT imaging between 2009 and 2021. Tumors were segmented in both HAP and PVP CT phases using an artificial intelligence-based auto-segmentation model and reviewed by a trained radiologist. The MAM was quantified using a biomechanical deformable image registration process. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare the prognostic value for predicting local tumor progression (LTP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 81 patients (60 y±13, 53 men), 151 CRLMs were included. During 29.4 months of median follow-up, LTP was noted in 24/151 (15.9%). Median tumor volumes on HAP and PVP CT were 1.7 mL and 1.2 mL, respectively, with respective median MAMs of 2.3 and 4.0 mm (both P< 0.001). The AUROC for 1-year LTP prediction was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70-0.85) on HAP and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78-0.91) on PVP (P= 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation, MAM measured based on tumors segmented on PVP images conferred a higher predictive accuracy of ablation outcomes among CRLM patients than those segmented on HAP images, supporting the use of PVP rather than HAP images for segmentation during ablation of CRLMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001782","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the predictive value of minimal ablative margin (MAM) quantification using tumor segmentation on intraprocedural contrast-enhanced hepatic arterial (HAP) versus portal venous phase (PVP) CT on local outcomes following percutaneous thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

Methods: This dual-center retrospective study included patients undergoing thermal ablation of CRLM with intraprocedural preablation and postablation contrast-enhanced CT imaging between 2009 and 2021. Tumors were segmented in both HAP and PVP CT phases using an artificial intelligence-based auto-segmentation model and reviewed by a trained radiologist. The MAM was quantified using a biomechanical deformable image registration process. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare the prognostic value for predicting local tumor progression (LTP).

Results: Among 81 patients (60 y±13, 53 men), 151 CRLMs were included. During 29.4 months of median follow-up, LTP was noted in 24/151 (15.9%). Median tumor volumes on HAP and PVP CT were 1.7 mL and 1.2 mL, respectively, with respective median MAMs of 2.3 and 4.0 mm (both P< 0.001). The AUROC for 1-year LTP prediction was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70-0.85) on HAP and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78-0.91) on PVP (P= 0.002).

Conclusions: During CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation, MAM measured based on tumors segmented on PVP images conferred a higher predictive accuracy of ablation outcomes among CRLM patients than those segmented on HAP images, supporting the use of PVP rather than HAP images for segmentation during ablation of CRLMs.

肝动脉与门静脉期CT对结肠转移瘤分割的最小消融边缘量化:双中心回顾性分析。
目的:比较术中增强肝动脉造影(HAP)与门静脉造影(PVP) CT最小消融缘(MAM)量化对经皮肝转移瘤(CRLM)热消融术后局部预后的预测价值。方法:这项双中心回顾性研究纳入了2009年至2021年间接受CRLM热消融术中术前和术后CT增强成像的患者。使用基于人工智能的自动分割模型在HAP和PVP CT阶段对肿瘤进行分割,并由训练有素的放射科医生进行检查。使用生物力学可变形图像配准过程对MAM进行量化。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)来比较预测局部肿瘤进展(LTP)的预后价值。结果:81例患者(男性60±13,53例)中,纳入151例crlm。在29.4个月的中位随访期间,24/151例(15.9%)出现LTP。HAP和PVP CT中位肿瘤体积分别为1.7 mL和1.2 mL, MAMs中位分别为2.3和4.0 mm (P均< 0.001)。1年LTP预测的AUROC在HAP上为0.78 (95% CI: 0.70-0.85),在PVP上为0.84 (95% CI: 0.78-0.91) (P= 0.002)。结论:在ct引导下的经皮热消融过程中,基于PVP图像分割的肿瘤测量的MAM对CRLM患者消融结果的预测准确性高于HAP图像分割的肿瘤,支持在CRLM消融过程中使用PVP图像而不是HAP图像进行分割。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信