Angelo M Dell'Aquila, Konrad Wisniewski, Adrian-Iustin Georgevici, Gábor Szabó, Francesco Onorati, Till J Demal, Andreas Rukosujew, Sven Peterss, Caroline Radner, Joscha Buech, Antonio Fiore, Andrea Perrotti, Angel G Pinto, Javier Rodriguez Lega, Marek Pol, Petr Kacer, Enzo Mazzaro, Giuseppe Gatti, Igor Vendramin, Daniela Piani, Luisa Ferrante, Mauro Rinaldi, Eduard Quintana, Robert Pruna-Guillen, Dario Di Perna, Zein El-Dean, Hiwa Sherzad, Giovanni Mariscalco, Mark Field, Amer Harky, Manoj Kuduvalli, Matteo Pettinari, Stefano Rosato, Tatu Juvonen, Timo Mäkikallio, Lenard Conradi, Giorgio Mastroiacovo, Fausto Biancari
{"title":"Preoperative Mechanical Ventilation Prior to Surgical Repair for Type A Aortic Dissection: Incidence, Risk, and Outcomes.","authors":"Angelo M Dell'Aquila, Konrad Wisniewski, Adrian-Iustin Georgevici, Gábor Szabó, Francesco Onorati, Till J Demal, Andreas Rukosujew, Sven Peterss, Caroline Radner, Joscha Buech, Antonio Fiore, Andrea Perrotti, Angel G Pinto, Javier Rodriguez Lega, Marek Pol, Petr Kacer, Enzo Mazzaro, Giuseppe Gatti, Igor Vendramin, Daniela Piani, Luisa Ferrante, Mauro Rinaldi, Eduard Quintana, Robert Pruna-Guillen, Dario Di Perna, Zein El-Dean, Hiwa Sherzad, Giovanni Mariscalco, Mark Field, Amer Harky, Manoj Kuduvalli, Matteo Pettinari, Stefano Rosato, Tatu Juvonen, Timo Mäkikallio, Lenard Conradi, Giorgio Mastroiacovo, Fausto Biancari","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12070239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Several conditions associated with type A aortic dissection may require preoperative invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The current literature lacks data on this subset of patients' prevalence and postoperative outcomes. This study aims to investigate this unexplored issue in a multicenter European registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 3735 patients included in the European Registry of Type A Aortic Dissection (ERTAAD) were the subject of this analysis. Bootstrapped Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression was performed for variable selection to identify key predictors of hospital death. In the second step, a multilevel multivariable logistic regression (MMLR) was carried out, given the clustered structure of the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 346 (9.3%) out of 3735 patients required preoperative IMV. Compared to the non-IMV patients, patients requiring IMV had a significantly higher rate of organ malperfusion (52% vs. 35%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a higher proportion of tears in the aortic root (<i>p</i> = 0.048). The in-hospital mortality rate among IMV patients was 38% vs. 15% in non-IMV patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001), without a difference in post-discharge survival (<i>p</i> = 0.84). At the MMLR, patients who required IMV had 135% higher odds of in-hospital death compared to the remaining patients. IMV yielded the second highest odds in the prediction model for in-hospital mortality (OR 2.13, CI 1.60 to 2.85, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among IMV patients, the extension of surgery to the aortic arch was significantly associated with increased in-hospital mortality (<i>p</i> < 0.001, OR 2.98). In multivariable analysis, preoperative IMV was independently associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The need for invasive mechanical ventilation before surgical repair for type A aortic dissection is not infrequent. In this subpopulation, the in-hospital mortality rate was twofold compared to patients who did not require IMV. The awareness of the preoperative risk profile and outcomes of this subset of patients should urge surgeons to tailor the surgical strategy more appropriately to improve the immediate postoperative results.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12070239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Several conditions associated with type A aortic dissection may require preoperative invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The current literature lacks data on this subset of patients' prevalence and postoperative outcomes. This study aims to investigate this unexplored issue in a multicenter European registry.
Methods: Data from 3735 patients included in the European Registry of Type A Aortic Dissection (ERTAAD) were the subject of this analysis. Bootstrapped Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression was performed for variable selection to identify key predictors of hospital death. In the second step, a multilevel multivariable logistic regression (MMLR) was carried out, given the clustered structure of the data.
Results: A total of 346 (9.3%) out of 3735 patients required preoperative IMV. Compared to the non-IMV patients, patients requiring IMV had a significantly higher rate of organ malperfusion (52% vs. 35%, p < 0.001) and a higher proportion of tears in the aortic root (p = 0.048). The in-hospital mortality rate among IMV patients was 38% vs. 15% in non-IMV patients (p < 0.001), without a difference in post-discharge survival (p = 0.84). At the MMLR, patients who required IMV had 135% higher odds of in-hospital death compared to the remaining patients. IMV yielded the second highest odds in the prediction model for in-hospital mortality (OR 2.13, CI 1.60 to 2.85, p < 0.001). Among IMV patients, the extension of surgery to the aortic arch was significantly associated with increased in-hospital mortality (p < 0.001, OR 2.98). In multivariable analysis, preoperative IMV was independently associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality.
Conclusions: The need for invasive mechanical ventilation before surgical repair for type A aortic dissection is not infrequent. In this subpopulation, the in-hospital mortality rate was twofold compared to patients who did not require IMV. The awareness of the preoperative risk profile and outcomes of this subset of patients should urge surgeons to tailor the surgical strategy more appropriately to improve the immediate postoperative results.
目的:与A型主动脉夹层相关的几种情况可能需要术前有创机械通气(IMV)。目前的文献缺乏关于这部分患者的患病率和术后结果的数据。本研究旨在调查这一未开发的问题,在一个多中心的欧洲注册。方法:来自欧洲A型主动脉夹层登记(ERTAAD)的3735例患者的数据是本分析的主题。采用自启动最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)逻辑回归进行变量选择,以确定医院死亡的关键预测因素。在第二步中,考虑到数据的聚类结构,进行了多水平多变量逻辑回归(MMLR)。结果:3735例患者中有346例(9.3%)需要术前IMV。与非IMV患者相比,需要IMV的患者器官灌注不良的发生率明显更高(52% vs. 35%, p < 0.001),主动脉根部撕裂的比例更高(p = 0.048)。IMV患者的住院死亡率为38%,非IMV患者为15% (p < 0.001),出院后生存率无差异(p = 0.84)。在MMLR中,需要IMV的患者与其余患者相比,住院死亡的几率高出135%。在院内死亡率预测模型中,IMV的赔率第二高(OR 2.13, CI 1.60 ~ 2.85, p < 0.001)。在IMV患者中,手术延伸至主动脉弓与住院死亡率增加显著相关(p < 0.001, OR 2.98)。在多变量分析中,术前IMV与住院死亡率增加的几率独立相关。结论:A型主动脉夹层手术修复前需要有创机械通气的情况并不少见。在这个亚群中,与不需要IMV的患者相比,住院死亡率是两倍。对这部分患者的术前风险概况和预后的认识应促使外科医生更适当地调整手术策略,以改善术后即时效果。