Divergent Cardiac Adaptations in Endurance Sport: Atrial Fibrillation Markers in Marathon Versus Ultramarathon Athletes.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Zbigniew Waśkiewicz, Eduard Bezuglov, Oleg Talibov, Robert Gajda, Zhassyn Mukhambetov, Daulet Azerbaev, Sergei Bondarev
{"title":"Divergent Cardiac Adaptations in Endurance Sport: Atrial Fibrillation Markers in Marathon Versus Ultramarathon Athletes.","authors":"Zbigniew Waśkiewicz, Eduard Bezuglov, Oleg Talibov, Robert Gajda, Zhassyn Mukhambetov, Daulet Azerbaev, Sergei Bondarev","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12070260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endurance training induces significant cardiac remodeling, with evidence suggesting that prolonged high-intensity exercise may increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, physiological responses differ by event type. This review compares AF-related markers in marathon and ultramarathon runners, focusing on structural adaptations, inflammatory and endothelial biomarkers, and the incidence of arrhythmias. A systematic analysis of 29 studies revealed consistent left atrial (LA) enlargement in marathon runners linked to elevated AF risk and fibrosis markers such as Galectin-3 and PIIINP. In contrast, ultramarathon runners exhibited right atrial (RA) dilation and increased systemic inflammation, as indicated by elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and soluble E-selectin levels. AF incidence in marathoners ranged from 0.43 per 100 person-years to 4.4%, while direct AF incidence data remain unavailable for ultramarathon populations, highlighting a critical evidence gap. These findings suggest distinct remodeling patterns and pathophysiological profiles between endurance disciplines, with implications for athlete screening and cardiovascular risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12070260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endurance training induces significant cardiac remodeling, with evidence suggesting that prolonged high-intensity exercise may increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, physiological responses differ by event type. This review compares AF-related markers in marathon and ultramarathon runners, focusing on structural adaptations, inflammatory and endothelial biomarkers, and the incidence of arrhythmias. A systematic analysis of 29 studies revealed consistent left atrial (LA) enlargement in marathon runners linked to elevated AF risk and fibrosis markers such as Galectin-3 and PIIINP. In contrast, ultramarathon runners exhibited right atrial (RA) dilation and increased systemic inflammation, as indicated by elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and soluble E-selectin levels. AF incidence in marathoners ranged from 0.43 per 100 person-years to 4.4%, while direct AF incidence data remain unavailable for ultramarathon populations, highlighting a critical evidence gap. These findings suggest distinct remodeling patterns and pathophysiological profiles between endurance disciplines, with implications for athlete screening and cardiovascular risk stratification.

耐力运动中不同的心脏适应:马拉松和超级马拉松运动员的房颤标志物。
耐力训练诱导显著的心脏重构,有证据表明,长时间的高强度运动可能增加心房颤动(AF)的风险。然而,生理反应因事件类型而异。这篇综述比较了马拉松和超级马拉松运动员af相关标志物,重点关注结构适应、炎症和内皮生物标志物以及心律失常的发生率。一项对29项研究的系统分析显示,马拉松运动员的左心房(LA)持续扩大与房颤风险和纤维化标志物(如半乳糖凝集素-3和PIIINP)升高有关。相比之下,超级马拉松运动员表现出右心房(RA)扩张和全身炎症增加,这表明高敏c反应蛋白(hs-CRP)和可溶性e选择素水平升高。马拉松运动员的房颤发病率从0.43 / 100人-年到4.4%不等,而超级马拉松人群的房颤发病率的直接数据仍然无法获得,这突出了一个关键的证据差距。这些发现表明不同耐力学科之间的重塑模式和病理生理特征不同,这对运动员筛查和心血管风险分层具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信