A colloidal oat-containing baby wash is gentle and effective for atopic-prone skin.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
M Catherine Mack, Gabriella John, Diana Friscia, Christine Perna, Denise Bion, Melody Ailsworth, Kappa Peddy, Neena K Tierney
{"title":"A colloidal oat-containing baby wash is gentle and effective for atopic-prone skin.","authors":"M Catherine Mack, Gabriella John, Diana Friscia, Christine Perna, Denise Bion, Melody Ailsworth, Kappa Peddy, Neena K Tierney","doi":"10.1111/ics.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite accumulating data supporting the effectiveness of colloidal oatmeal-based moisturizers in improving mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD), evidence in paediatric populations is limited. This study evaluated the tolerability and effectiveness of a colloidal oatmeal-containing baby wash formulation in babies prone to AD, based on clinical and parental assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 4-week, single-centre, nonrandomized study of babies (3-36 months) prone to AD (per an AD-prone skin recruiting questionnaire developed in-house), parents/legal guardians used the baby wash on their babies ≥3 times per week (no more than once daily), each bath lasting ≤20 min. The overall skin condition (scored from 0/excellent to 3/poor) and cutaneous tolerance scoring of dryness, redness/erythema, rash/irritation and tactile roughness on the baby's face, arms, legs and torso (each scored from 0/none to 3/severe) were assessed clinically at baseline, Week 1 and Week 4. Cutaneous tolerance scoring of burning/stinging and itching on those body sites was evaluated by the parent per the latter scale at all visits. At study end, the parental questionnaire evaluated the level of agreement/disagreement with statements regarding the baby wash. Safety measures included adverse events and changes in health (per the parents or clinicians).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 29 infant-parent pairs enrolled, 24 (82.8%) completed the study. All 24 babies were White/Caucasian; 13 (54.2%) were male. The overall skin condition mean score showed no statistically significant change from baseline (0.54) at Weeks 1 (0.33) and 4 (0.29). Per the investigator-rated cutaneous tolerance scores, >87% of body sites exhibited no dryness, redness/erythema, rash/irritation or tactile roughness at Week 4. For each parameter, significant improvements from baseline were observed at Week 4 for the combined skin sites (p < 0.05). Per the parent-rated cutaneous tolerance scores, nearly all sites had no burning/stinging or itching at Week 4. Itching for the combined sites demonstrated significant improvements from baseline at Week 4 (p < 0.05). The parental questionnaire revealed statistically significantly more favourable experiences with the baby wash than unfavourable experiences. Four babies experienced five mild, treatment-unrelated adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study findings indicate that the colloidal oatmeal-containing baby wash was well tolerated and effective when used in babies with AD-prone skin.</p>","PeriodicalId":13936,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cosmetic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cosmetic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ics.70010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite accumulating data supporting the effectiveness of colloidal oatmeal-based moisturizers in improving mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD), evidence in paediatric populations is limited. This study evaluated the tolerability and effectiveness of a colloidal oatmeal-containing baby wash formulation in babies prone to AD, based on clinical and parental assessments.

Methods: In this 4-week, single-centre, nonrandomized study of babies (3-36 months) prone to AD (per an AD-prone skin recruiting questionnaire developed in-house), parents/legal guardians used the baby wash on their babies ≥3 times per week (no more than once daily), each bath lasting ≤20 min. The overall skin condition (scored from 0/excellent to 3/poor) and cutaneous tolerance scoring of dryness, redness/erythema, rash/irritation and tactile roughness on the baby's face, arms, legs and torso (each scored from 0/none to 3/severe) were assessed clinically at baseline, Week 1 and Week 4. Cutaneous tolerance scoring of burning/stinging and itching on those body sites was evaluated by the parent per the latter scale at all visits. At study end, the parental questionnaire evaluated the level of agreement/disagreement with statements regarding the baby wash. Safety measures included adverse events and changes in health (per the parents or clinicians).

Results: Of 29 infant-parent pairs enrolled, 24 (82.8%) completed the study. All 24 babies were White/Caucasian; 13 (54.2%) were male. The overall skin condition mean score showed no statistically significant change from baseline (0.54) at Weeks 1 (0.33) and 4 (0.29). Per the investigator-rated cutaneous tolerance scores, >87% of body sites exhibited no dryness, redness/erythema, rash/irritation or tactile roughness at Week 4. For each parameter, significant improvements from baseline were observed at Week 4 for the combined skin sites (p < 0.05). Per the parent-rated cutaneous tolerance scores, nearly all sites had no burning/stinging or itching at Week 4. Itching for the combined sites demonstrated significant improvements from baseline at Week 4 (p < 0.05). The parental questionnaire revealed statistically significantly more favourable experiences with the baby wash than unfavourable experiences. Four babies experienced five mild, treatment-unrelated adverse events.

Conclusion: The study findings indicate that the colloidal oatmeal-containing baby wash was well tolerated and effective when used in babies with AD-prone skin.

含有胶体燕麦的婴儿洗面奶温和,对易过敏的皮肤有效。
目的:尽管越来越多的数据支持胶体燕麦保湿剂在改善轻度至中度特应性皮炎(AD)方面的有效性,但在儿科人群中的证据有限。本研究基于临床和父母的评估,评估了一种含有胶体燕麦的婴儿洗面奶配方对易患AD的婴儿的耐受性和有效性。方法:在这项为期4周的单中心、非随机研究中,研究对象是3-36个月的易患AD的婴儿(根据公司内部开发的易患AD的皮肤招募问卷),父母/法定监护人每周给婴儿使用婴儿洗液≥3次(每天不超过一次),每次洗澡时间≤20分钟。在基线、第1周和第4周进行临床评估,整体皮肤状况(评分从0/优秀到3/差)和婴儿面部、手臂、腿部和躯干的干燥、发红/红斑、皮疹/刺激和触觉粗糙的皮肤耐受性评分(评分从0/无到3/严重)。在所有访问中,由父母根据后一种量表评估这些身体部位的灼烧/刺痛和瘙痒的皮肤耐受性评分。在研究结束时,父母问卷评估同意/不同意关于婴儿洗液陈述的程度。安全措施包括不良事件和健康变化(根据父母或临床医生)。结果:入选的29对婴儿父母中,有24对(82.8%)完成了研究。所有24名婴儿均为白种人/高加索人;男性13例(54.2%)。在第1周(0.33)和第4周(0.29)时,总体皮肤状况平均评分与基线(0.54)相比无统计学意义的变化。根据研究人员评定的皮肤耐受性评分,在第4周时,87%的身体部位没有出现干燥、发红/红斑、皮疹/刺激或触觉粗糙。对于每个参数,在第4周时观察到联合皮肤部位的基线显著改善(p)。结论:研究结果表明,含有胶体燕麦的婴儿洗液在ad易发皮肤的婴儿中使用时耐受性良好且有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original refereed papers, review papers and correspondence in the fields of cosmetic research. It is read by practising cosmetic scientists and dermatologists, as well as specialists in more diverse disciplines that are developing new products which contact the skin, hair, nails or mucous membranes. The aim of the Journal is to present current scientific research, both pure and applied, in: cosmetics, toiletries, perfumery and allied fields. Areas that are of particular interest include: studies in skin physiology and interactions with cosmetic ingredients, innovation in claim substantiation methods (in silico, in vitro, ex vivo, in vivo), human and in vitro safety testing of cosmetic ingredients and products, physical chemistry and technology of emulsion and dispersed systems, theory and application of surfactants, new developments in olfactive research, aerosol technology and selected aspects of analytical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信