Martin Plymoth , Stephanie A. Lynch , Ameneh Khatami , Holly A. Sinclair , David L. Paterson , Jessica C. Sacher , Jan Zheng , Ruby CY. Lin , Jonathan R. Iredell
{"title":"Attitudes to phage therapy among Australian infectious diseases physicians","authors":"Martin Plymoth , Stephanie A. Lynch , Ameneh Khatami , Holly A. Sinclair , David L. Paterson , Jessica C. Sacher , Jan Zheng , Ruby CY. Lin , Jonathan R. Iredell","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2025.107579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Due to the rise in antimicrobial resistance, there has been an increased interest in phage therapy to treat multidrug-resistant infections. In Australia, phage therapy is predominantly used in small clinical studies or for compassionate use; however, despite its potential expansion in modern medicine, the perception of phage therapy among medical professionals remains largely unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a national survey of Australian infectious diseases and clinical microbiology advanced trainees and specialists using an online mailing list to assess their knowledge, areas of interest, and concerns around the use of phage therapy in clinical practice in Australia; with 92 eligible respondents.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most respondents believed that the current national plan for controlling antimicrobial resistance is inadequate and that phage therapy may be an effective solution; with 87 (97%) indicating that they would consider using phage therapy meeting established guidelines for purity and safety. There was a preference for bespoke therapy, with Gram-negative pathogens highlighted as priority targets. Alongside the phage therapy delivery protocols, therapeutic phage monitoring was considered important. Cystic fibrosis, lung-infections, prosthetic device/related infections, and infections among patients following transplantation and/or immunosuppression were highly ranked in terms of priorities for clinical syndromes. Accessibility was highlighted as a barrier to phage therapy, specifically, timely access (<em>n</em> = 66; 72%) and logistics of phage procurement and administration (<em>n</em> = 64; 70%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These results suggest the support of phage therapy among infectious diseases and clinical microbiology advanced trainees and specialists in Australia, and highlights areas of focus and priority in order to advance phage therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":"66 5","pages":"Article 107579"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857925001347","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Due to the rise in antimicrobial resistance, there has been an increased interest in phage therapy to treat multidrug-resistant infections. In Australia, phage therapy is predominantly used in small clinical studies or for compassionate use; however, despite its potential expansion in modern medicine, the perception of phage therapy among medical professionals remains largely unknown.
Methods
We conducted a national survey of Australian infectious diseases and clinical microbiology advanced trainees and specialists using an online mailing list to assess their knowledge, areas of interest, and concerns around the use of phage therapy in clinical practice in Australia; with 92 eligible respondents.
Results
Most respondents believed that the current national plan for controlling antimicrobial resistance is inadequate and that phage therapy may be an effective solution; with 87 (97%) indicating that they would consider using phage therapy meeting established guidelines for purity and safety. There was a preference for bespoke therapy, with Gram-negative pathogens highlighted as priority targets. Alongside the phage therapy delivery protocols, therapeutic phage monitoring was considered important. Cystic fibrosis, lung-infections, prosthetic device/related infections, and infections among patients following transplantation and/or immunosuppression were highly ranked in terms of priorities for clinical syndromes. Accessibility was highlighted as a barrier to phage therapy, specifically, timely access (n = 66; 72%) and logistics of phage procurement and administration (n = 64; 70%).
Conclusions
These results suggest the support of phage therapy among infectious diseases and clinical microbiology advanced trainees and specialists in Australia, and highlights areas of focus and priority in order to advance phage therapy.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.