Attitudes to phage therapy among Australian infectious diseases physicians

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Martin Plymoth , Stephanie A. Lynch , Ameneh Khatami , Holly A. Sinclair , David L. Paterson , Jessica C. Sacher , Jan Zheng , Ruby CY. Lin , Jonathan R. Iredell
{"title":"Attitudes to phage therapy among Australian infectious diseases physicians","authors":"Martin Plymoth ,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Lynch ,&nbsp;Ameneh Khatami ,&nbsp;Holly A. Sinclair ,&nbsp;David L. Paterson ,&nbsp;Jessica C. Sacher ,&nbsp;Jan Zheng ,&nbsp;Ruby CY. Lin ,&nbsp;Jonathan R. Iredell","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2025.107579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Due to the rise in antimicrobial resistance, there has been an increased interest in phage therapy to treat multidrug-resistant infections. In Australia, phage therapy is predominantly used in small clinical studies or for compassionate use; however, despite its potential expansion in modern medicine, the perception of phage therapy among medical professionals remains largely unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a national survey of Australian infectious diseases and clinical microbiology advanced trainees and specialists using an online mailing list to assess their knowledge, areas of interest, and concerns around the use of phage therapy in clinical practice in Australia; with 92 eligible respondents.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most respondents believed that the current national plan for controlling antimicrobial resistance is inadequate and that phage therapy may be an effective solution; with 87 (97%) indicating that they would consider using phage therapy meeting established guidelines for purity and safety. There was a preference for bespoke therapy, with Gram-negative pathogens highlighted as priority targets. Alongside the phage therapy delivery protocols, therapeutic phage monitoring was considered important. Cystic fibrosis, lung-infections, prosthetic device/related infections, and infections among patients following transplantation and/or immunosuppression were highly ranked in terms of priorities for clinical syndromes. Accessibility was highlighted as a barrier to phage therapy, specifically, timely access (<em>n</em> = 66; 72%) and logistics of phage procurement and administration (<em>n</em> = 64; 70%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These results suggest the support of phage therapy among infectious diseases and clinical microbiology advanced trainees and specialists in Australia, and highlights areas of focus and priority in order to advance phage therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":"66 5","pages":"Article 107579"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857925001347","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Due to the rise in antimicrobial resistance, there has been an increased interest in phage therapy to treat multidrug-resistant infections. In Australia, phage therapy is predominantly used in small clinical studies or for compassionate use; however, despite its potential expansion in modern medicine, the perception of phage therapy among medical professionals remains largely unknown.

Methods

We conducted a national survey of Australian infectious diseases and clinical microbiology advanced trainees and specialists using an online mailing list to assess their knowledge, areas of interest, and concerns around the use of phage therapy in clinical practice in Australia; with 92 eligible respondents.

Results

Most respondents believed that the current national plan for controlling antimicrobial resistance is inadequate and that phage therapy may be an effective solution; with 87 (97%) indicating that they would consider using phage therapy meeting established guidelines for purity and safety. There was a preference for bespoke therapy, with Gram-negative pathogens highlighted as priority targets. Alongside the phage therapy delivery protocols, therapeutic phage monitoring was considered important. Cystic fibrosis, lung-infections, prosthetic device/related infections, and infections among patients following transplantation and/or immunosuppression were highly ranked in terms of priorities for clinical syndromes. Accessibility was highlighted as a barrier to phage therapy, specifically, timely access (n = 66; 72%) and logistics of phage procurement and administration (n = 64; 70%).

Conclusions

These results suggest the support of phage therapy among infectious diseases and clinical microbiology advanced trainees and specialists in Australia, and highlights areas of focus and priority in order to advance phage therapy.
澳大利亚传染病医生对噬菌体治疗的态度。
背景:由于抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的上升,人们对噬菌体治疗多重耐药感染的兴趣越来越大。在澳大利亚,噬菌体疗法主要用于小型临床研究或用于同情用途,然而,尽管其在现代医学中有潜在的扩展,但医学专业人员对噬菌体疗法的认识在很大程度上仍然未知。方法:我们对澳大利亚传染病和临床微生物学高级学员和专家进行了一项全国性调查,使用在线邮件列表评估他们在澳大利亚临床实践中使用噬菌体治疗的知识、兴趣领域和关注点;92名合格的受访者。结果:大多数应答者认为目前国家控制抗菌素耐药性计划不足,噬菌体治疗可能是一种有效的解决方案;87人(97%)表示他们会考虑使用符合既定纯度和安全性指南的噬菌体疗法。人们倾向于定制治疗,将革兰氏阴性病原体作为优先目标。除了噬菌体治疗递送方案外,治疗性噬菌体被认为是重要的。囊性纤维化(CF)、肺部感染、假体装置/相关感染以及移植和/或免疫抑制后患者的感染在临床综合征的优先级方面排名很高。可及性被强调为噬菌体治疗的障碍,特别是及时获得(n=66;72%)和噬菌体采购和管理的后勤(n=64;70%)。结论:这些结果表明噬菌体治疗在澳大利亚传染病和临床微生物学高级学员和专家中得到支持,并突出了噬菌体治疗的重点和优先领域,以推进噬菌体治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信