Insights into bone and cartilage responses to pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation: a review with quantitative comparisons.

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Pub Date : 2025-07-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2025.1557572
Beatrice Masante, Stefano Gabetti, Joao C Silva, Giovanni Putame, Simone Israel, Cristina Bignardi, Diana Massai
{"title":"Insights into bone and cartilage responses to pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation: a review with quantitative comparisons.","authors":"Beatrice Masante, Stefano Gabetti, Joao C Silva, Giovanni Putame, Simone Israel, Cristina Bignardi, Diana Massai","doi":"10.3389/fbioe.2025.1557572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bone fractures and cartilage pathologies represent a heavy socioeconomic burden for the national healthcare systems worldwide. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation has become a widely recognized treatment for enhancing bone fracture healing and reducing tissue inflammation, thereby supporting bone tissue regeneration. More recently, its effectiveness in treating cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis has also been demonstrated. However, the effects of PEMF, particularly the underlying mechanisms related to the activation of specific signaling pathways, are not yet fully known neither correlated with the specific PEMF parameters applied. As a result, standardized protocols for PEMF treatment are lacking in clinical practice, leading to empirical application of PEMF stimulation and heterogeneity in treatment protocols. For these reasons, over the past three decades, the biological effects of PEMF on bone and cartilage tissues have been extensively investigated through both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> experiments. The aim of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the performed studies, focusing on the applied PEMF stimulation parameters and the induced effects on bone and cartilage tissues. Furthermore, to enable comparisons across various published protocols and to aid in understanding the correlation between applied PEMF parameters and their resulting biological effects, we propose, for the first time, a quantitative descriptor for PEMF stimulation, termed PEMF dose, which accounts for magnetic field intensity, stimulation waveform, and exposure duration. The use of this comprehensive descriptor enabled the identification of common features across different studies and, in the future, it could serve as a valuable tool for refining PEMF stimulation protocols and establishing standardized guidelines to support bone and cartilage repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":12444,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1557572"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12287613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1557572","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bone fractures and cartilage pathologies represent a heavy socioeconomic burden for the national healthcare systems worldwide. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation has become a widely recognized treatment for enhancing bone fracture healing and reducing tissue inflammation, thereby supporting bone tissue regeneration. More recently, its effectiveness in treating cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis has also been demonstrated. However, the effects of PEMF, particularly the underlying mechanisms related to the activation of specific signaling pathways, are not yet fully known neither correlated with the specific PEMF parameters applied. As a result, standardized protocols for PEMF treatment are lacking in clinical practice, leading to empirical application of PEMF stimulation and heterogeneity in treatment protocols. For these reasons, over the past three decades, the biological effects of PEMF on bone and cartilage tissues have been extensively investigated through both in vitro and in vivo experiments. The aim of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the performed studies, focusing on the applied PEMF stimulation parameters and the induced effects on bone and cartilage tissues. Furthermore, to enable comparisons across various published protocols and to aid in understanding the correlation between applied PEMF parameters and their resulting biological effects, we propose, for the first time, a quantitative descriptor for PEMF stimulation, termed PEMF dose, which accounts for magnetic field intensity, stimulation waveform, and exposure duration. The use of this comprehensive descriptor enabled the identification of common features across different studies and, in the future, it could serve as a valuable tool for refining PEMF stimulation protocols and establishing standardized guidelines to support bone and cartilage repair.

深入了解骨和软骨响应脉冲电磁场刺激:回顾与定量比较。
骨折和软骨病变代表了一个沉重的社会经济负担的国家卫生保健系统在世界范围内。脉冲电磁场(PEMF)刺激已成为一种广泛认可的治疗方法,可以促进骨折愈合和减少组织炎症,从而支持骨组织再生。最近,它在治疗软骨变性和骨关节炎方面的有效性也得到了证实。然而,PEMF的作用,特别是与特定信号通路激活相关的潜在机制,尚不完全清楚,也不与应用的特定PEMF参数相关。因此,临床实践中缺乏标准化的PEMF治疗方案,导致了PEMF刺激的经验应用和治疗方案的异质性。由于这些原因,在过去的三十年中,PEMF对骨和软骨组织的生物学效应已经通过体外和体内实验进行了广泛的研究。本综述的目的是提供已进行的研究的详细概述,重点是应用PEMF刺激参数和诱导对骨和软骨组织的影响。此外,为了能够对各种已发表的方案进行比较,并帮助理解应用的PEMF参数与其产生的生物效应之间的相关性,我们首次提出了PEMF刺激的定量描述符,称为PEMF剂量,它考虑了磁场强度、刺激波形和暴露持续时间。使用这种综合描述符可以识别不同研究中的共同特征,并且在未来,它可以作为改进PEMF刺激方案和建立支持骨和软骨修复的标准化指南的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
2270
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The translation of new discoveries in medicine to clinical routine has never been easy. During the second half of the last century, thanks to the progress in chemistry, biochemistry and pharmacology, we have seen the development and the application of a large number of drugs and devices aimed at the treatment of symptoms, blocking unwanted pathways and, in the case of infectious diseases, fighting the micro-organisms responsible. However, we are facing, today, a dramatic change in the therapeutic approach to pathologies and diseases. Indeed, the challenge of the present and the next decade is to fully restore the physiological status of the diseased organism and to completely regenerate tissue and organs when they are so seriously affected that treatments cannot be limited to the repression of symptoms or to the repair of damage. This is being made possible thanks to the major developments made in basic cell and molecular biology, including stem cell science, growth factor delivery, gene isolation and transfection, the advances in bioengineering and nanotechnology, including development of new biomaterials, biofabrication technologies and use of bioreactors, and the big improvements in diagnostic tools and imaging of cells, tissues and organs. In today`s world, an enhancement of communication between multidisciplinary experts, together with the promotion of joint projects and close collaborations among scientists, engineers, industry people, regulatory agencies and physicians are absolute requirements for the success of any attempt to develop and clinically apply a new biological therapy or an innovative device involving the collective use of biomaterials, cells and/or bioactive molecules. “Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology” aspires to be a forum for all people involved in the process by bridging the gap too often existing between a discovery in the basic sciences and its clinical application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信