Performance of self-reported periodontitis questionnaire administered by community health workers.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Zuila Albuquerque Taboza, Liana Freire Brito, Nauyla Braga Mesquita, Virgínia Regia Silveira, Ana Karine Teixeira, Rodrigo Otavio Rego
{"title":"Performance of self-reported periodontitis questionnaire administered by community health workers.","authors":"Zuila Albuquerque Taboza, Liana Freire Brito, Nauyla Braga Mesquita, Virgínia Regia Silveira, Ana Karine Teixeira, Rodrigo Otavio Rego","doi":"10.1177/0265539X251361702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the response and validity of a self-reported periodontal questionnaire administered by community health workers (CHWs) for severe periodontitis (SPER) screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CHWs administered the CDC/AAP questionnaire in their communities. Participants underwent a complete periodontal examination. Based on these data, SPER was evaluated considering three definitions: CDC/AAP, EFP/AAP, and the presence of two sextants with probing depth (PD)≥ 6 mm. Questionnaire performance was analysed using the chi-square test and logistic regression with an assessment of sensitivity (SS), specificity (SP) and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 243 individuals completed the questionnaire. The prevalence of SPER was 47.3%. When SPER patients were compared with the controls (using the CDC/AAP criteria), significant differences in the means of interproximal clinical attachment loss and PD values were observed (p < 0.05). Responses to three of the eight questions, \"having gum disease\" (odds ratio [OR] = 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5-4.7), \"general health of teeth and gums\" (OR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.2-0.9) and \"tooth mobility\" (OR 2.6, 95% CI = 1.5-4.7) were associated with SPER (p < 0.05). In the regression analysis, the best models to predict SPER were those that included all the self-reported questions and all sociodemographic variables either using CDC/AAP definitions (SS = 69.7%, SP = 80.3, ROC= 0.806) or the presence of two sextants with PD≥ 6 mm (SS = 82.1%, SP = 69.2, ROC = 0.861).</p><p><strong>Concluding remarks: </strong>The CDC/AAP Self-reported periodontal questionnaire administered by CHWs to screen individuals for severe periodontitis was effectively capable of screening patients with this disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":" ","pages":"265539X251361702"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0265539X251361702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the response and validity of a self-reported periodontal questionnaire administered by community health workers (CHWs) for severe periodontitis (SPER) screening.

Methods: CHWs administered the CDC/AAP questionnaire in their communities. Participants underwent a complete periodontal examination. Based on these data, SPER was evaluated considering three definitions: CDC/AAP, EFP/AAP, and the presence of two sextants with probing depth (PD)≥ 6 mm. Questionnaire performance was analysed using the chi-square test and logistic regression with an assessment of sensitivity (SS), specificity (SP) and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results: In total, 243 individuals completed the questionnaire. The prevalence of SPER was 47.3%. When SPER patients were compared with the controls (using the CDC/AAP criteria), significant differences in the means of interproximal clinical attachment loss and PD values were observed (p < 0.05). Responses to three of the eight questions, "having gum disease" (odds ratio [OR] = 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5-4.7), "general health of teeth and gums" (OR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.2-0.9) and "tooth mobility" (OR 2.6, 95% CI = 1.5-4.7) were associated with SPER (p < 0.05). In the regression analysis, the best models to predict SPER were those that included all the self-reported questions and all sociodemographic variables either using CDC/AAP definitions (SS = 69.7%, SP = 80.3, ROC= 0.806) or the presence of two sextants with PD≥ 6 mm (SS = 82.1%, SP = 69.2, ROC = 0.861).

Concluding remarks: The CDC/AAP Self-reported periodontal questionnaire administered by CHWs to screen individuals for severe periodontitis was effectively capable of screening patients with this disease.

社区卫生工作者自行报告牙周炎问卷的表现。
目的:评价社区卫生工作者(CHWs)对重度牙周炎(SPER)筛查的自报牙周问卷的反应和有效性。方法:卫生保健工作者在其所在社区进行CDC/AAP问卷调查。参与者接受了完整的牙周检查。基于这些数据,SPER评估考虑了三个定义:CDC/AAP, EFP/AAP,以及探测深度(PD)≥6 mm的两个六分仪的存在。采用卡方检验和logistic回归对问卷进行分析,评估问卷的敏感性(SS)、特异性(SP)和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。结果:共243人完成问卷。SPER患病率为47.3%。当SPER患者与对照组比较时(使用CDC/AAP标准),观察到近端间临床附着丧失的平均值和PD值有显著差异(p < 0.05)。8个问题中的3个问题,“是否有牙龈疾病”(比值比[OR] = 2.6, 95%可信区间[CI] = 1.5-4.7)、“牙齿和牙龈的总体健康状况”(比值比[OR] = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.2-0.9)和“牙齿活动性”(比值比[OR] 2.6, 95% CI = 1.5-4.7)与SPER相关(p < 0.05)。在回归分析中,预测SPER的最佳模型是使用CDC/AAP定义(SS = 69.7%, SP = 80.3, ROC= 0.806)或存在两个PD≥6 mm的六分仪(SS = 82.1%, SP = 69.2, ROC= 0.861)包括所有自我报告问题和所有社会人口学变量的模型。结论:美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC) /美国儿科学会(AAP)自行报告的牙周调查问卷由卫生保健工作者管理,用于筛查严重牙周炎的个体,能够有效地筛查患有这种疾病的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community dental health
Community dental health 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is concerned with dental public health and related subjects. Dental public health is the science and the art of preventing oral disease, promoting oral health, and improving the quality of life through the organised efforts of society. The discipline covers a wide range and includes such topics as: -oral epidemiology- oral health services research- preventive dentistry - especially in relation to communities- oral health education and promotion- clinical research - with particular emphasis on the care of special groups- behavioural sciences related to dentistry- decision theory- quality of life- risk analysis- ethics and oral health economics- quality assessment. The journal publishes scientific articles on the relevant fields, review articles, discussion papers, news items, and editorials. It is of interest to dentists working in dental public health and to other professionals concerned with disease prevention, health service planning, and health promotion throughout the world. In the case of epidemiology of oral diseases the Journal prioritises national studies unless local studies have major methodological innovations or information of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信