Biosimilars and reference biological medicines in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Catalonia, Spain.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Clinical Rheumatology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1007/s10067-025-07568-9
Joan Mas Marin, Marina Molina-Olano, Nuria Rudi Sola, Núria Miserachs-Aranda, Paula Montoliu Alcón, Jan T De Pourcq, Carles Quiñones Ribas, Laura Borràs Trias, Eva Fernández-Cañabate, Juan González-Valdivieso, Carlos Figueiredo-Escribá, René Delgado-Hernández, Antonio J Braza, Cecilia F Lastra, Eduardo L Mariño, Pilar Modamio
{"title":"Biosimilars and reference biological medicines in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Catalonia, Spain.","authors":"Joan Mas Marin, Marina Molina-Olano, Nuria Rudi Sola, Núria Miserachs-Aranda, Paula Montoliu Alcón, Jan T De Pourcq, Carles Quiñones Ribas, Laura Borràs Trias, Eva Fernández-Cañabate, Juan González-Valdivieso, Carlos Figueiredo-Escribá, René Delgado-Hernández, Antonio J Braza, Cecilia F Lastra, Eduardo L Mariño, Pilar Modamio","doi":"10.1007/s10067-025-07568-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of reference biologic medicines used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) specifically adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, with corresponding biosimilar medicines, based on an exploratory analysis of clinical data obtained in patients treated with these medicines in five hospitals in the region of Catalonia, Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There is a consultation of the database of the Registry of Patients and Treatments of the Catalan Health Service: extraction of data from adult patients diagnosed with moderate and severe active RA and with active prescription of at least one biological drug (reference or biosimilar) or JAK inhibitor. To compare the effectiveness of each reference biologic with its biosimilar, differences in mean DAS28-ESR values before and after treatment were assessed for adalimumab and its biosimilar, etanercept and its biosimilar, and infliximab and its biosimilar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study consisted of 643 patients. The most dispensed medicines were anti-TNFs, with 303 patients on treatment. Thirty-six percent of all patients were using biosimilars. No statistically significant differences were observed in any of the three comparisons between the reference biologic medicine and its biosimilar. These findings suggest that biosimilars have comparable effectiveness to reference biologics in reducing DAS28-ESR; in addition, they can provide substantial savings to public health systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant number of patients diagnosed with moderate to severe active RA were treated with biological medicines and receiving the available biosimilar treatments. Future research should be conducted to confirm comparable effectiveness found to their reference biologic medicines in this exploratory analysis. Key Points • Biosimilar use: 36% of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Catalonia are treated with biosimilars, exceeding the 12% recommendation. This reflects growing acceptance of these alternatives. • Comparative effectiveness: Biosimilars of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab showed comparable therapeutic benefit to their reference biologics in reducing disease activity in active rheumatoid arthritis. • Real-world data: The study provides real-world data from five hospitals, making biosimilar medicines a viable choice for rheumatologists in routine rheumatoid arthritis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10482,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"3445-3458"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-025-07568-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of reference biologic medicines used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) specifically adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, with corresponding biosimilar medicines, based on an exploratory analysis of clinical data obtained in patients treated with these medicines in five hospitals in the region of Catalonia, Spain.

Methods: There is a consultation of the database of the Registry of Patients and Treatments of the Catalan Health Service: extraction of data from adult patients diagnosed with moderate and severe active RA and with active prescription of at least one biological drug (reference or biosimilar) or JAK inhibitor. To compare the effectiveness of each reference biologic with its biosimilar, differences in mean DAS28-ESR values before and after treatment were assessed for adalimumab and its biosimilar, etanercept and its biosimilar, and infliximab and its biosimilar.

Results: The study consisted of 643 patients. The most dispensed medicines were anti-TNFs, with 303 patients on treatment. Thirty-six percent of all patients were using biosimilars. No statistically significant differences were observed in any of the three comparisons between the reference biologic medicine and its biosimilar. These findings suggest that biosimilars have comparable effectiveness to reference biologics in reducing DAS28-ESR; in addition, they can provide substantial savings to public health systems.

Conclusions: A significant number of patients diagnosed with moderate to severe active RA were treated with biological medicines and receiving the available biosimilar treatments. Future research should be conducted to confirm comparable effectiveness found to their reference biologic medicines in this exploratory analysis. Key Points • Biosimilar use: 36% of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Catalonia are treated with biosimilars, exceeding the 12% recommendation. This reflects growing acceptance of these alternatives. • Comparative effectiveness: Biosimilars of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab showed comparable therapeutic benefit to their reference biologics in reducing disease activity in active rheumatoid arthritis. • Real-world data: The study provides real-world data from five hospitals, making biosimilar medicines a viable choice for rheumatologists in routine rheumatoid arthritis management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

类风湿性关节炎的生物仿制药和参考生物药物治疗:西班牙加泰罗尼亚的一项多中心横断面研究。
目的:本研究的目的是比较用于治疗类风湿性关节炎(RA)的参考生物药物,特别是阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗与相应的生物仿制药的有效性,基于对西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区五家医院接受这些药物治疗的患者的临床数据进行探索性分析。方法:查阅加泰罗尼亚卫生服务患者和治疗登记数据库:从诊断为中度和重度活动性RA的成年患者中提取数据,这些患者至少有一种生物药物(参比药或生物类似药)或JAK抑制剂的有效处方。为了比较每种参考生物制剂与其生物仿制药的有效性,我们评估了阿达木单抗及其生物仿制药、依那西普及其生物仿制药、英夫利昔单抗及其生物仿制药治疗前后平均DAS28-ESR值的差异。结果:共纳入643例患者。发放最多的药物是抗肿瘤生长因子,有303名患者接受治疗。36%的患者使用生物仿制药。在参比生物药及其生物仿制药的三种比较中,均未观察到统计学上的显著差异。这些发现表明,生物仿制药在降低DAS28-ESR方面与参比生物药具有相当的有效性;此外,它们可以为公共卫生系统节省大量资金。结论:大量诊断为中重度活动性RA的患者接受了生物药物治疗,并接受了现有的生物类似药治疗。未来的研究应进行,以确认可比的有效性,发现他们的参考生物药物在这一探索性分析。•生物类似药的使用:加泰罗尼亚36%的类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者使用生物类似药治疗,超过了12%的推荐值。这反映出人们越来越接受这些替代方案。•比较有效性:阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗的生物仿制药在减少活动性类风湿关节炎的疾病活动性方面显示出与其参考生物制剂相当的治疗益处。•真实数据:该研究提供了来自五家医院的真实数据,使生物仿制药成为风湿病学家常规类风湿性关节炎治疗的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rheumatology
Clinical Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
441
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Rheumatology is an international English-language journal devoted to publishing original clinical investigation and research in the general field of rheumatology with accent on clinical aspects at postgraduate level. The journal succeeds Acta Rheumatologica Belgica, originally founded in 1945 as the official journal of the Belgian Rheumatology Society. Clinical Rheumatology aims to cover all modern trends in clinical and experimental research as well as the management and evaluation of diagnostic and treatment procedures connected with the inflammatory, immunologic, metabolic, genetic and degenerative soft and hard connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信