gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 mutations in specific different domains affect ovarian cancer prognosis: A multicenter retrospective study.

IF 7.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yingying Zhu, Yingying Wang, Zhen Shen, Lina Shen, Hanyuan Liu, Libing Xiang, Xinya Huang, Wei Gou, Mengyun Wang, Rongyu Zang, Ying Zhou, Tingyan Shi
{"title":"gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 mutations in specific different domains affect ovarian cancer prognosis: A multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"Yingying Zhu, Yingying Wang, Zhen Shen, Lina Shen, Hanyuan Liu, Libing Xiang, Xinya Huang, Wei Gou, Mengyun Wang, Rongyu Zang, Ying Zhou, Tingyan Shi","doi":"10.1097/CM9.0000000000003652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognostic value of germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCA1/2m) in ovarian cancer is controversial, and the clinical implications of specific mutation domains within BRCA1/2 remain underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the impact of distinct gBRCA1/2m domains on survival outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study, conducted between 2010 and 2022 at three major academic centers in China, analyzed 313 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer with pathogenic gBRCA1/2m. We evaluated associations between gBRCA1/2m domains and clinical outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS) and platinum-free interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy without maintenance therapy with BRCA1 C-terminal domain 1 (BRCT1) mutations showed significantly prolonged PFS (37.8 vs. 22.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.99; P = 0.042), whereas those with Really Interesting New Gene (RING) mutations had shorter PFS (13.1 vs. 23.2 months; HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.89-3.72; P = 0.097). In the subgroup of gross residual disease, RING mutations were significantly associated with reduced PFS (12.9 vs. 21.8 months; HR, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.29-8.18; P = 0.008). A higher likelihood of primary platinum-refractory disease (odds ratio, 7.78; 95% CI, 1.25-48.31; P = 0.028) was observed. Across all mutation locations, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance therapy demonstrated benefits, notably for patients with BRCA1 RING mutations (HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.84; P = 0.010) and BRCA2 RAD51-binding domain (RAD51-BD) mutations (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.79; P = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BRCA1 BRCT1 mutations are associated with improved prognosis following platinum-based chemotherapy, whereas BRCA1 RING domain mutations are linked to a heightened risk of primary platinum-refractory disease. Our findings underscore the need for complete resection with no gross residual disease in patients harboring RING mutations. Furthermore, PARPi maintenance therapy exhibits variable efficacy based on mutation location, with BRCA1 RING and BRCA2 RAD51-BD mutations conferring significant benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":10183,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000003652","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prognostic value of germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCA1/2m) in ovarian cancer is controversial, and the clinical implications of specific mutation domains within BRCA1/2 remain underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the impact of distinct gBRCA1/2m domains on survival outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study, conducted between 2010 and 2022 at three major academic centers in China, analyzed 313 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer with pathogenic gBRCA1/2m. We evaluated associations between gBRCA1/2m domains and clinical outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS) and platinum-free interval.

Results: Patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy without maintenance therapy with BRCA1 C-terminal domain 1 (BRCT1) mutations showed significantly prolonged PFS (37.8 vs. 22.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.99; P = 0.042), whereas those with Really Interesting New Gene (RING) mutations had shorter PFS (13.1 vs. 23.2 months; HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.89-3.72; P = 0.097). In the subgroup of gross residual disease, RING mutations were significantly associated with reduced PFS (12.9 vs. 21.8 months; HR, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.29-8.18; P = 0.008). A higher likelihood of primary platinum-refractory disease (odds ratio, 7.78; 95% CI, 1.25-48.31; P = 0.028) was observed. Across all mutation locations, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance therapy demonstrated benefits, notably for patients with BRCA1 RING mutations (HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.84; P = 0.010) and BRCA2 RAD51-binding domain (RAD51-BD) mutations (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.79; P = 0.010).

Conclusions: BRCA1 BRCT1 mutations are associated with improved prognosis following platinum-based chemotherapy, whereas BRCA1 RING domain mutations are linked to a heightened risk of primary platinum-refractory disease. Our findings underscore the need for complete resection with no gross residual disease in patients harboring RING mutations. Furthermore, PARPi maintenance therapy exhibits variable efficacy based on mutation location, with BRCA1 RING and BRCA2 RAD51-BD mutations conferring significant benefits.

gBRCA1和gBRCA2特定不同结构域的突变影响卵巢癌预后:一项多中心回顾性研究
背景:种系BRCA1/2突变(gBRCA1/2m)在卵巢癌中的预后价值存在争议,BRCA1/2内特定突变域的临床意义仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在探讨不同的gBRCA1/2m结构域对卵巢癌患者生存结局的影响。方法:这项多中心回顾性研究于2010年至2022年在中国三个主要学术中心进行,分析了313例致病性gBRCA1/2m的上皮性卵巢癌患者。我们评估了gBRCA1/2m结构域与临床结果(包括无进展生存期(PFS)和无铂期)之间的关系。结果:BRCA1 c -末端结构域1 (BRCT1)突变的患者接受以铂为基础的化疗而不进行维持治疗,PFS明显延长(37.8个月vs. 22.6个月;风险比[HR], 0.43;95%置信区间[CI], 0.19-0.99;P = 0.042),而具有真正有趣的新基因(RING)突变的患者PFS较短(13.1个月vs. 23.2个月;人力资源,1.82;95% ci, 0.89-3.72;P = 0.097)。在总体残留疾病亚组中,RING突变与PFS降低显著相关(12.9 vs 21.8个月;人力资源,3.25;95% ci, 1.29-8.18;P = 0.008)。原发性铂难治性疾病的可能性更高(优势比,7.78;95% ci, 1.25-48.31;P = 0.028)。在所有突变位点,聚(adp -核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)维持治疗显示出益处,特别是对于BRCA1 RING突变患者(HR, 0.10;95% ci, 0.01-0.84;P = 0.010)和BRCA2 rad51结合域(RAD51-BD)突变(HR, 0.29;95% ci, 0.11-0.79;P = 0.010)。结论:BRCA1 BRCT1突变与铂基化疗后预后改善相关,而BRCA1 RING结构域突变与原发性铂难治性疾病的高风险相关。我们的研究结果强调了对携带RING突变的患者进行完全切除且无明显残留疾病的必要性。此外,PARPi维持治疗根据突变位置表现出不同的疗效,BRCA1 RING和BRCA2 RAD51-BD突变赋予显著的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese Medical Journal
Chinese Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
19245
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Chinese Medical Journal (CMJ) is published semimonthly in English by the Chinese Medical Association, and is a peer reviewed general medical journal for all doctors, researchers, and health workers regardless of their medical specialty or type of employment. Established in 1887, it is the oldest medical periodical in China and is distributed worldwide. The journal functions as a window into China’s medical sciences and reflects the advances and progress in China’s medical sciences and technology. It serves the objective of international academic exchange. The journal includes Original Articles, Editorial, Review Articles, Medical Progress, Brief Reports, Case Reports, Viewpoint, Clinical Exchange, Letter,and News,etc. CMJ is abstracted or indexed in many databases including Biological Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, Index Medicus/Medline, Science Citation Index (SCI), Current Contents, Cancerlit, Health Plan & Administration, Embase, Social Scisearch, Aidsline, Toxline, Biocommercial Abstracts, Arts and Humanities Search, Nuclear Science Abstracts, Water Resources Abstracts, Cab Abstracts, Occupation Safety & Health, etc. In 2007, the impact factor of the journal by SCI is 0.636, and the total citation is 2315.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信