Clinicopathological Determinants of Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-25 Epub Date: 2025-07-16 DOI:10.12968/hmed.2025.0175
Shanliang Shang, Jianhua Yang, Zhi Ma, Xiao Zhang
{"title":"Clinicopathological Determinants of Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Shanliang Shang, Jianhua Yang, Zhi Ma, Xiao Zhang","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2025.0175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> Accurate identification of lymph node metastasis is critical for optimising surgical strategies in early-stage cervical cancer. This study aimed to analyse multiple clinicopathological factors which are potentially associated with lymph node metastasis to guide personalised lymphadenectomy decisions. <b>Methods</b> This retrospective cohort study included 266 patients with early-stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stage IA1 to IIA2) who underwent surgical treatment at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, between 1 December 2014 and 31 December 2019. Patients were followed up every 3 months for the first 2 years, every 6 months for the next 3 years, and annually thereafter. The presence of lymph node metastasis was included as the primary outcome, while the associated factors as secondary outcomes. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify risk factors associated with lymph node metastasis. <b>Results</b> The mean age of the study participants (n = 266) was 44.26 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.19), and the median follow-up duration was 48.7 months (range 12-72 months). Lymph node metastasis was observed in 15.41% of patients. The metastatic rates increased with advancing FIGO stage: IA1 and IA2 (0%), IB1 (13.44%), IB2 (15.00%), IIA1 (23.33%), and IIA2 (66.67%). Univariate analysis identified FIGO stage (<i>p</i> < 0.001), depth of stromal invasion (<i>p</i> < 0.001), tumour size (<i>p</i> = 0.017), parametrial invasion (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (<i>p</i> < 0.001) as significantly associated risk factors for lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis identified tumour size ≥4 cm (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 3.857; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.530-9.728; <i>p</i> = 0.004), FIGO stage II (adjusted OR: 8.247; 95% CI: 3.171-21.455; <i>p</i> < 0.001), LVSI (adjusted OR: 2.974; 95% CI: 1.344-6.632; <i>p</i> = 0.008), and parametrial invasion (adjusted OR: 5.585; 95% CI: 1.900-16.415; <i>p</i> = 0.002) as independent risk factors for nodal metastasis. <b>Conclusion</b> This study identifies several key clinicopathological factors associated with lymph node metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer. These findings underscore the importance of meticulous preoperative risk assessment and offer an evidence-based foundation for tailored surgical planning to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 7","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2025.0175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/Background Accurate identification of lymph node metastasis is critical for optimising surgical strategies in early-stage cervical cancer. This study aimed to analyse multiple clinicopathological factors which are potentially associated with lymph node metastasis to guide personalised lymphadenectomy decisions. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 266 patients with early-stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stage IA1 to IIA2) who underwent surgical treatment at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, between 1 December 2014 and 31 December 2019. Patients were followed up every 3 months for the first 2 years, every 6 months for the next 3 years, and annually thereafter. The presence of lymph node metastasis was included as the primary outcome, while the associated factors as secondary outcomes. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify risk factors associated with lymph node metastasis. Results The mean age of the study participants (n = 266) was 44.26 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.19), and the median follow-up duration was 48.7 months (range 12-72 months). Lymph node metastasis was observed in 15.41% of patients. The metastatic rates increased with advancing FIGO stage: IA1 and IA2 (0%), IB1 (13.44%), IB2 (15.00%), IIA1 (23.33%), and IIA2 (66.67%). Univariate analysis identified FIGO stage (p < 0.001), depth of stromal invasion (p < 0.001), tumour size (p = 0.017), parametrial invasion (p < 0.001), and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (p < 0.001) as significantly associated risk factors for lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis identified tumour size ≥4 cm (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 3.857; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.530-9.728; p = 0.004), FIGO stage II (adjusted OR: 8.247; 95% CI: 3.171-21.455; p < 0.001), LVSI (adjusted OR: 2.974; 95% CI: 1.344-6.632; p = 0.008), and parametrial invasion (adjusted OR: 5.585; 95% CI: 1.900-16.415; p = 0.002) as independent risk factors for nodal metastasis. Conclusion This study identifies several key clinicopathological factors associated with lymph node metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer. These findings underscore the importance of meticulous preoperative risk assessment and offer an evidence-based foundation for tailored surgical planning to improve patient outcomes.

早期宫颈癌淋巴结转移的临床病理决定因素:回顾性队列研究。
目的/背景准确识别淋巴结转移对于优化早期宫颈癌的手术策略至关重要。本研究旨在分析可能与淋巴结转移相关的多种临床病理因素,以指导个体化淋巴结切除术决策。方法回顾性队列研究纳入2014年12月1日至2019年12月31日在浙江大学医学院邵逸夫爵士医院接受手术治疗的266例早期宫颈癌(国际妇产科学联合会[FIGO] IA1至IIA2期)患者。前2年每3个月随访一次,后3年每6个月随访一次,此后每年随访一次。淋巴结转移的存在作为主要结局,而相关因素作为次要结局。进行单因素和多因素logistic回归,以确定与淋巴结转移相关的危险因素。结果研究参与者(n = 266)的平均年龄为44.26岁(标准差[SD] = 10.19),中位随访时间为48.7个月(12-72个月)。15.41%的患者出现淋巴结转移。随着FIGO分期的进展,转移率增加:IA1和IA2 (0%), IB1 (13.44%), IB2 (15.00%), IIA1(23.33%)和IIA2(66.67%)。单因素分析发现FIGO分期(p < 0.001)、间质浸润深度(p < 0.001)、肿瘤大小(p = 0.017)、参数浸润(p < 0.001)和淋巴血管间隙浸润(LVSI) (p < 0.001)是淋巴结转移的显著相关危险因素。多因素分析确定肿瘤大小≥4 cm(校正优势比[OR]: 3.857;95%置信区间[CI]: 1.530-9.728;p = 0.004), FIGO II期(调整OR: 8.247;95% ci: 3.171-21.455;p < 0.001), LVSI(校正OR: 2.974;95% ci: 1.344-6.632;p = 0.008),参数入侵(校正OR: 5.585;95% ci: 1.900-16.415;P = 0.002)为淋巴结转移的独立危险因素。结论本研究确定了与早期宫颈癌淋巴结转移相关的几个关键临床病理因素。这些发现强调了细致的术前风险评估的重要性,并为量身定制的手术计划提供了循证基础,以改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信