Negligible clinical impact of subsequent non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolation during MDR/RR-TB treatment: a 9-year retrospective cohort study from Wenzhou, China.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Qingyong Zheng, Quelu Chen, Wenzhen Zhou, Ouyang Huang, Guiqing He
{"title":"Negligible clinical impact of subsequent non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolation during MDR/RR-TB treatment: a 9-year retrospective cohort study from Wenzhou, China.","authors":"Qingyong Zheng, Quelu Chen, Wenzhen Zhou, Ouyang Huang, Guiqing He","doi":"10.1186/s12879-025-11336-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The frequency of clinical isolation of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in patients with multidrug-resistant or rifampin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) is increasing, but its relevance remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the frequency of NTM isolation and its clinical relevance in respiratory specimens from MDR/RR-TB patients in Wenzhou, China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of MDR/RR-TB patients with NTM isolated from 2014 to 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. To establish the clinical relevance, the diagnostic criteria for nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) published by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2014 and 2022, a total of 922 patients were enrolled, among whom 45 (4.9%) cases yielded NTM isolates, resulting in the isolation of 68 distinct NTM strains. The most prevalent NTM species was M. abscessus, accounting for 36.8% (25/68) of the isolates, followed by M. intracellulare at 22.1% (15/68) and M. avium at 8.8% (6/68). Notably, only five cases (0.54%) met the microbiologic criteria specified in the ATS/IDSA guidelines. Four of these cases received no specific NTM treatment and achieved a favorable prognosis with anti-TB therapy. Remarkably, a single case out of 922 (0.11%) was identified as having concomitant MDR/RR-TB and NTM-PD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical relevance of respiratory NTM isolates in patients with MDR/RR-TB is generally low, with the overwhelming majority of these NTM isolates being either colonizers or contaminants. Consequently, in most cases, those with concomitant NTM isolates do not require specific therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"942"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11336-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The frequency of clinical isolation of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in patients with multidrug-resistant or rifampin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) is increasing, but its relevance remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the frequency of NTM isolation and its clinical relevance in respiratory specimens from MDR/RR-TB patients in Wenzhou, China.

Methods: Medical records of MDR/RR-TB patients with NTM isolated from 2014 to 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. To establish the clinical relevance, the diagnostic criteria for nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) published by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) were applied.

Results: Between 2014 and 2022, a total of 922 patients were enrolled, among whom 45 (4.9%) cases yielded NTM isolates, resulting in the isolation of 68 distinct NTM strains. The most prevalent NTM species was M. abscessus, accounting for 36.8% (25/68) of the isolates, followed by M. intracellulare at 22.1% (15/68) and M. avium at 8.8% (6/68). Notably, only five cases (0.54%) met the microbiologic criteria specified in the ATS/IDSA guidelines. Four of these cases received no specific NTM treatment and achieved a favorable prognosis with anti-TB therapy. Remarkably, a single case out of 922 (0.11%) was identified as having concomitant MDR/RR-TB and NTM-PD.

Conclusions: The clinical relevance of respiratory NTM isolates in patients with MDR/RR-TB is generally low, with the overwhelming majority of these NTM isolates being either colonizers or contaminants. Consequently, in most cases, those with concomitant NTM isolates do not require specific therapy.

在MDR/RR-TB治疗期间,随后的非结核分枝杆菌分离的临床影响可以忽略不计:来自中国温州的9年回顾性队列研究
背景:临床在耐多药或利福平耐药结核病(MDR/RR-TB)患者中分离非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)的频率正在增加,但其相关性尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估中国温州地区MDR/RR-TB患者呼吸道标本中NTM分离频率及其临床相关性。方法:回顾性分析2014 ~ 2022年MDR/RR-TB分离NTM患者的医疗记录。采用美国胸科学会(ATS)和美国传染病学会(IDSA)公布的非结核性分枝杆菌肺病(NTM-PD)诊断标准,建立临床相关性。结果:2014 - 2022年共纳入922例患者,其中45例(4.9%)分离出NTM菌株,分离出68株不同的NTM菌株。以脓肿支原体最多,占36.8%(25/68),其次是胞内支原体(22.1%)和鸟支原体(8.8%)。值得注意的是,只有5例(0.54%)符合ATS/IDSA指南中规定的微生物学标准。其中4例未接受特异性NTM治疗,并通过抗结核治疗获得良好预后。值得注意的是,922例中有1例(0.11%)被确定为合并MDR/RR-TB和NTM-PD。结论:呼吸道NTM分离株在MDR/RR-TB患者中的临床相关性通常较低,绝大多数NTM分离株要么是定植菌,要么是污染物。因此,在大多数情况下,伴有NTM分离株的患者不需要特异性治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信