Jose Antonio Abarca, Cristina González-Fernández, Camilo Estevan Peralta, Axel Arruti, Esther Santos, Guillermo Díaz-Sainz, Angel Irabien
{"title":"Prototype Validation of a Large-Scale CO<sub>2</sub>-to-Formate Zero-Gap Electrolyzer.","authors":"Jose Antonio Abarca, Cristina González-Fernández, Camilo Estevan Peralta, Axel Arruti, Esther Santos, Guillermo Díaz-Sainz, Angel Irabien","doi":"10.1002/cssc.202501116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The scale-up of gas-phase CO<sub>2</sub> electroreduction to formate is crucial for its industrial application but remains largely unexplored. This work presents the design and validation of a 100 cm<sup>2</sup> electrolyzer prototype featuring a zero-gap configuration and a serpentine flow field to ensure uniform CO<sub>2</sub> distribution. Scaling up a CO<sub>2</sub> electrolyzer requires optimized flow field design, in this case, a serpentine geometry enhances CO<sub>2</sub> transport and minimizes mass transfer limitations, thereby improving overall performance. Experimental prototype testing is conducted to evaluate the effects of current density and water content in the CO<sub>2</sub> feed. Optimal performance is achieved at 200 mA cm<sup>-</sup> <sup>2</sup> and a water content of 15 g h<sup>-</sup> <sup>1</sup>, yielding a formate concentration of 760 g L<sup>-</sup> <sup>1</sup>, a Faradaic efficiency of 67%, a production rate of 7 mmol m<sup>-</sup> <sup>2</sup> s<sup>-</sup> <sup>1</sup>, and an energy consumption of 507 kWh kmol<sup>-</sup> <sup>1</sup>. Comparisons with a 10 cm<sup>2</sup> lab-scale reactor reveal improved CO<sub>2</sub> conversion and production rate, validating the benefits of optimized flow field design and scale-up approach. While energy efficiency is somewhat reduced to increased Ohmic losses, the overall results support the technical feasibility of scaling gas-phase CO<sub>2</sub>-to-formate electrolysis. Further improvements in design and energy management are still needed to advance toward industrial implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":149,"journal":{"name":"ChemSusChem","volume":" ","pages":"e2501116"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemSusChem","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202501116","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The scale-up of gas-phase CO2 electroreduction to formate is crucial for its industrial application but remains largely unexplored. This work presents the design and validation of a 100 cm2 electrolyzer prototype featuring a zero-gap configuration and a serpentine flow field to ensure uniform CO2 distribution. Scaling up a CO2 electrolyzer requires optimized flow field design, in this case, a serpentine geometry enhances CO2 transport and minimizes mass transfer limitations, thereby improving overall performance. Experimental prototype testing is conducted to evaluate the effects of current density and water content in the CO2 feed. Optimal performance is achieved at 200 mA cm-2 and a water content of 15 g h-1, yielding a formate concentration of 760 g L-1, a Faradaic efficiency of 67%, a production rate of 7 mmol m-2 s-1, and an energy consumption of 507 kWh kmol-1. Comparisons with a 10 cm2 lab-scale reactor reveal improved CO2 conversion and production rate, validating the benefits of optimized flow field design and scale-up approach. While energy efficiency is somewhat reduced to increased Ohmic losses, the overall results support the technical feasibility of scaling gas-phase CO2-to-formate electrolysis. Further improvements in design and energy management are still needed to advance toward industrial implementation.
期刊介绍:
ChemSusChem
Impact Factor (2016): 7.226
Scope:
Interdisciplinary journal
Focuses on research at the interface of chemistry and sustainability
Features the best research on sustainability and energy
Areas Covered:
Chemistry
Materials Science
Chemical Engineering
Biotechnology