Chemical Passivation of Titanium and Ti-6Al-4V Alloy and Impact on Biocompatibility: A Comprehensive 50-Year Review and Best Practice Guidelines

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Gopinath Mani, Andreas Ornberg, Robert Shulfer, Marika Kamberi
{"title":"Chemical Passivation of Titanium and Ti-6Al-4V Alloy and Impact on Biocompatibility: A Comprehensive 50-Year Review and Best Practice Guidelines","authors":"Gopinath Mani,&nbsp;Andreas Ornberg,&nbsp;Robert Shulfer,&nbsp;Marika Kamberi","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Chemical passivation is a standard surface finishing treatment applied to commercially pure Titanium (cp-Ti) and Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) when preparing them for use in medical devices. Although this treatment has been widely used for over 50 years, there remains a lack of consensus regarding its precise impact on surface characteristics and subsequent biocompatibility. This article comprehensively reviews the literature on this topic and sheds light on the reasons behind the conflicting research findings even after decades of practice. First, the nitric acid-based passivation protocol, originally developed for stainless steel, is often directly applied to cp-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V without specific optimization studies. Second, the pre-treatment processes, pre-cleaning procedures, and passivation protocols are significantly varied among the studies in the literature to provide vastly different outcomes regarding surface properties and subsequent material performance. Third, the ASTM F86 standard, commonly used in many studies, has several limitations. It provides open-ended recommendations for certain parameters (such as acid treatment time) without specifying maximum limits, lacks clearly defined validation processes, and relies on inadequate inspection methods (like visual examination). These limitations result in significant variations in outcomes and incomplete characterizations. Fourth, the surface characteristics subjected to chemical passivation differ due to the diverse manufacturing processes used in the studies. This results in varying outcomes, even when the same passivation protocol is employed. Considering the various shortcomings in the literature, a set of best practice recommendations is provided to enhance the reliability and consistency of research outcomes in the chemical passivation of cp-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"113 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35626","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemical passivation is a standard surface finishing treatment applied to commercially pure Titanium (cp-Ti) and Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) when preparing them for use in medical devices. Although this treatment has been widely used for over 50 years, there remains a lack of consensus regarding its precise impact on surface characteristics and subsequent biocompatibility. This article comprehensively reviews the literature on this topic and sheds light on the reasons behind the conflicting research findings even after decades of practice. First, the nitric acid-based passivation protocol, originally developed for stainless steel, is often directly applied to cp-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V without specific optimization studies. Second, the pre-treatment processes, pre-cleaning procedures, and passivation protocols are significantly varied among the studies in the literature to provide vastly different outcomes regarding surface properties and subsequent material performance. Third, the ASTM F86 standard, commonly used in many studies, has several limitations. It provides open-ended recommendations for certain parameters (such as acid treatment time) without specifying maximum limits, lacks clearly defined validation processes, and relies on inadequate inspection methods (like visual examination). These limitations result in significant variations in outcomes and incomplete characterizations. Fourth, the surface characteristics subjected to chemical passivation differ due to the diverse manufacturing processes used in the studies. This results in varying outcomes, even when the same passivation protocol is employed. Considering the various shortcomings in the literature, a set of best practice recommendations is provided to enhance the reliability and consistency of research outcomes in the chemical passivation of cp-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V.

钛和Ti-6Al-4V合金的化学钝化及其对生物相容性的影响:一个全面的50年回顾和最佳实践指南
化学钝化是在制备用于医疗设备的商用纯钛(cp-Ti)和钛- 6铝- 4钒(Ti-6Al-4V)时应用的标准表面处理。尽管这种治疗方法已经被广泛使用了50多年,但对于其对表面特性和随后的生物相容性的确切影响仍然缺乏共识。本文全面回顾了关于这一主题的文献,并在几十年的实践中阐明了研究结果相互矛盾的原因。首先,最初为不锈钢开发的硝酸基钝化方案经常直接应用于cp-Ti和Ti-6Al-4V,而没有具体的优化研究。其次,在文献中的研究中,预处理过程、预清洗程序和钝化方案存在显著差异,从而在表面特性和随后的材料性能方面提供了截然不同的结果。第三,在许多研究中常用的ASTM F86标准有几个局限性。它对某些参数(如酸处理时间)提供了开放式建议,但没有规定最大限度,缺乏明确定义的验证过程,并且依赖于不充分的检查方法(如目视检查)。这些限制导致结果的显著差异和特征的不完整。第四,由于研究中使用的不同制造工艺,化学钝化的表面特性不同。即使采用相同的钝化协议,也会导致不同的结果。考虑到文献中的各种不足,本文提出了一套最佳实践建议,以提高cp-Ti和Ti-6Al-4V化学钝化研究成果的可靠性和一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
199
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats: • original research reports • short research and development reports • scientific reviews • current concepts articles • special reports • editorials Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信