{"title":"Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Cancer Care Evaluation Scale","authors":"Sevgi Doğan, Yasemin Erden, Gülçin Avşar","doi":"10.1155/ecc/9996675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Purpose:</b> The aim of the study is to adapt the “Cancer Care Evaluation Scale” to Turkish and to test its validity and reliability.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> The research was conducted methodologically. The data of the study were obtained from patients in a university hospital in eastern Türkiye between January and April 2023. The research was carried out with 350 people who met the inclusion criteria. The data were collected by the researchers using the “Patient Information Form” and the “Cancer Care Evaluation Scale.” Content validity index (CVI), Bartlett’s test of sphericity, Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) index, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to find out the content and construct validity. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, split-half reliability analysis, and correlation analysis were used to test reliability.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> As a result of the evaluations and analyses, the CVI of the scale was found to be as 0.94. The Cronbach’s alpha value of the subdimensions of the scale ranged from 0.843 to 0.975 and the total Cronbach’s alpha value was found to be 0.948. In the split-half reliability analysis, Spearman–Brown’s coefficient was found to be 0.989. The fit index values were found to be as follows: <i>X</i><sup>2</sup>/SD = 2.57, RMSEA = 0.067, GFI = 0.83, CFI = 0.955, and SRMR = 0.062. CFA results showed good fit index values.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> As a result of the research, the factor structure of 35 items and 12 subdimensional scales was confirmed by CFA. It was determined that the Turkish version of the Cancer Care Evaluation Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool to evaluate the care of cancer patients. The scale allows the care offered to cancer patients to be evaluated from the patient’s perspective. For this reason, it is thought that the scale will contribute to the identification of deficiencies in care and the improvement of the quality of care.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/9996675","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/9996675","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study is to adapt the “Cancer Care Evaluation Scale” to Turkish and to test its validity and reliability.
Methods: The research was conducted methodologically. The data of the study were obtained from patients in a university hospital in eastern Türkiye between January and April 2023. The research was carried out with 350 people who met the inclusion criteria. The data were collected by the researchers using the “Patient Information Form” and the “Cancer Care Evaluation Scale.” Content validity index (CVI), Bartlett’s test of sphericity, Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) index, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to find out the content and construct validity. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, split-half reliability analysis, and correlation analysis were used to test reliability.
Results: As a result of the evaluations and analyses, the CVI of the scale was found to be as 0.94. The Cronbach’s alpha value of the subdimensions of the scale ranged from 0.843 to 0.975 and the total Cronbach’s alpha value was found to be 0.948. In the split-half reliability analysis, Spearman–Brown’s coefficient was found to be 0.989. The fit index values were found to be as follows: X2/SD = 2.57, RMSEA = 0.067, GFI = 0.83, CFI = 0.955, and SRMR = 0.062. CFA results showed good fit index values.
Conclusion: As a result of the research, the factor structure of 35 items and 12 subdimensional scales was confirmed by CFA. It was determined that the Turkish version of the Cancer Care Evaluation Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool to evaluate the care of cancer patients. The scale allows the care offered to cancer patients to be evaluated from the patient’s perspective. For this reason, it is thought that the scale will contribute to the identification of deficiencies in care and the improvement of the quality of care.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of:
- Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients
- Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care
- Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients
- Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care
- Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members
- International perspectives on cancer care