Shubham Varshney , Chinmayi Ramaghatta , Prabhugouda Siriyappagouder , Andy M. Booth , Lisbet Sørensen , Pål A. Olsvik
{"title":"Multi-endpoint assessment of tunnel wash water and tyre-particle leachate in zebrafish larvae","authors":"Shubham Varshney , Chinmayi Ramaghatta , Prabhugouda Siriyappagouder , Andy M. Booth , Lisbet Sørensen , Pål A. Olsvik","doi":"10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.102096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Washing of road tunnels is essential for removing accumulated pollutants such as tyre wear particles, brake dust, exhaust residues, and road debris to ensure visibility and safe driving. Tunnel washing generates large volumes of contaminated runoff known as untreated tunnel wash runoff (UTWR). Some countries filter UTWR through a sedimentation process before release to reduce contamination, generating what is known as treated tunnel wash runoff (TWR). This study investigates the potential environmental impact of diluted UTWR (25 %) and TWR (50 %) by evaluating their toxicity in fish and comparing the effect to tyre-particle leachate (TPL, 2 g/L). UTWR was collected during tunnel cleaning, and TWR was collected after 14 days of filtration through sand sediments, from the Bodø tunnel in Norway. Zebrafish larvae, used as a fish model, exposed to contaminated runoff exhibited increased mortality, impaired growth, developmental anomalies, altered swimming behaviour, and changes in gene expression. Both UTWR and TWR exposure induced significant toxicity in zebrafish larvae, though the toxicity caused by TWR was notably lower than that of UTWR. This study shows that current filtration methods of tunnel wash water reduce the levels of most pollutants, however, more research is needed on how tunnel wash-water runoff affect aquatic ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23129,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Reports","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 102096"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214750025002148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Washing of road tunnels is essential for removing accumulated pollutants such as tyre wear particles, brake dust, exhaust residues, and road debris to ensure visibility and safe driving. Tunnel washing generates large volumes of contaminated runoff known as untreated tunnel wash runoff (UTWR). Some countries filter UTWR through a sedimentation process before release to reduce contamination, generating what is known as treated tunnel wash runoff (TWR). This study investigates the potential environmental impact of diluted UTWR (25 %) and TWR (50 %) by evaluating their toxicity in fish and comparing the effect to tyre-particle leachate (TPL, 2 g/L). UTWR was collected during tunnel cleaning, and TWR was collected after 14 days of filtration through sand sediments, from the Bodø tunnel in Norway. Zebrafish larvae, used as a fish model, exposed to contaminated runoff exhibited increased mortality, impaired growth, developmental anomalies, altered swimming behaviour, and changes in gene expression. Both UTWR and TWR exposure induced significant toxicity in zebrafish larvae, though the toxicity caused by TWR was notably lower than that of UTWR. This study shows that current filtration methods of tunnel wash water reduce the levels of most pollutants, however, more research is needed on how tunnel wash-water runoff affect aquatic ecosystems.