Radiographers’ knowledge and attitudes toward people who are gender and sexually diverse (GSD)

IF 2.8 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
J. Ta , S. Jia , B. Seyer , J. McInerney
{"title":"Radiographers’ knowledge and attitudes toward people who are gender and sexually diverse (GSD)","authors":"J. Ta ,&nbsp;S. Jia ,&nbsp;B. Seyer ,&nbsp;J. McInerney","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Gender and sexually diverse (GSD) people, including those identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual (LGBTQIA+), face significant barriers to accessing safe and equitable healthcare. While some studies on GSD patients in medical imaging exist, few focus on the perspectives of Australian radiographers. Within medical imaging, GSD patients report negative experiences due to social stigma, healthcare providers’ lack of awareness, and environmental factors. This study aimed to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of Australian radiographers toward providing safe, high-quality care for people who are GSD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An anonymous online survey, combining quantitative data from multiple-choice Likert-scale questions with qualitative data from open-ended questions was distributed to Australian radiographers via Australia Society for Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>122 radiographers responded and qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. Five themes were identified via thematic analysis and supported by analysing Likert-scale responses: education and training, communication, psychosocial safety, conflation of sex assigned at birth and gender identity, and perceptions of equal treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings indicate that while many radiographers understand the importance of GSD-inclusive care, there is lack of confidence in appropriate communication with GSD patients. Respondents expressed a desire for further education and clear departmental protocols to improve care for GSD patients. However, several radiographers believe GSD-inclusive care has limited relevance to radiography and saw it as an overcomplication of the role of the radiographer.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>The results highlight the need for further education and systemic changes in radiographic practice. This research reveals current gaps in knowledge and practice, emphasising the importance of fostering a more inclusive, supportive healthcare environment for GSD patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 5","pages":"Article 103096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425002408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Gender and sexually diverse (GSD) people, including those identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual (LGBTQIA+), face significant barriers to accessing safe and equitable healthcare. While some studies on GSD patients in medical imaging exist, few focus on the perspectives of Australian radiographers. Within medical imaging, GSD patients report negative experiences due to social stigma, healthcare providers’ lack of awareness, and environmental factors. This study aimed to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of Australian radiographers toward providing safe, high-quality care for people who are GSD.

Methods

An anonymous online survey, combining quantitative data from multiple-choice Likert-scale questions with qualitative data from open-ended questions was distributed to Australian radiographers via Australia Society for Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT).

Results

122 radiographers responded and qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. Five themes were identified via thematic analysis and supported by analysing Likert-scale responses: education and training, communication, psychosocial safety, conflation of sex assigned at birth and gender identity, and perceptions of equal treatment.

Conclusion

Findings indicate that while many radiographers understand the importance of GSD-inclusive care, there is lack of confidence in appropriate communication with GSD patients. Respondents expressed a desire for further education and clear departmental protocols to improve care for GSD patients. However, several radiographers believe GSD-inclusive care has limited relevance to radiography and saw it as an overcomplication of the role of the radiographer.

Implications for practice

The results highlight the need for further education and systemic changes in radiographic practice. This research reveals current gaps in knowledge and practice, emphasising the importance of fostering a more inclusive, supportive healthcare environment for GSD patients.
放射技师对性别及性差异人士的知识及态度(GSD)
性别和性多样性(GSD)人群,包括那些认定为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿、双性人和无性恋者(LGBTQIA+)的人,在获得安全和公平的医疗保健方面面临重大障碍。虽然有一些关于GSD患者在医学成像方面的研究,但很少关注澳大利亚放射技师的观点。在医学成像中,由于社会耻辱、医疗保健提供者缺乏意识和环境因素,GSD患者报告了负面经历。本研究旨在调查澳大利亚放射技师在为GSD患者提供安全、高质量护理方面的知识和态度。方法通过澳大利亚医学成像和放射治疗学会(ASMIRT)向澳大利亚放射技师进行匿名在线调查,将李克特多选题的定量数据与开放式问题的定性数据相结合。结果对122名放射技师进行了问卷调查,并对定性调查结果进行了专题分析。通过专题分析确定了五个主题,并通过分析李克特量表的反应得到支持:教育和培训、沟通、社会心理安全、出生性别和性别认同的合并,以及对平等待遇的看法。结论研究结果表明,尽管许多放射技师理解GSD包容性护理的重要性,但缺乏与GSD患者进行适当沟通的信心。受访者表示希望进一步的教育和明确的部门协议,以改善对GSD患者的护理。然而,一些放射技师认为,包括gsd在内的护理与放射摄影的相关性有限,并将其视为放射技师角色的过度复杂化。研究结果强调了放射学实践中进一步教育和系统变革的必要性。这项研究揭示了目前在知识和实践方面的差距,强调了为GSD患者培养更具包容性、支持性的医疗环境的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信