Understanding inherent requirements in Australian medical radiation science education: A document analysis of scope, structure, and professional alignment

IF 2.8 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
J.L. Ago , A. Kilgour , C.L. Smith , N. Pollard
{"title":"Understanding inherent requirements in Australian medical radiation science education: A document analysis of scope, structure, and professional alignment","authors":"J.L. Ago ,&nbsp;A. Kilgour ,&nbsp;C.L. Smith ,&nbsp;N. Pollard","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Inherent requirements are essential characteristics that enable students to achieve required professional capabilities. This study explores the availability and structure of medical radiation science inherent requirements, and their alignment with professional standards, across Australian tertiary institutions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A document analysis design was employed to review publicly available inherent requirements from accredited undergraduate medical radiation science programs. The ‘READ’ approach was used. This involved (i) readying the inherent requirement statements, (ii) extracting data, (iii) analysing, and (iv) distilling data through content analysis. Data analysis and synthesis focused on availability, structure, and content of the inherent requirements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 11 institutions, nine had publicly available inherent requirements. The analysis revealed variability in the structure and content of the available statements. While some institutions aligned their inherent requirements with professional standards (n = 5), there were inconsistencies in the inclusion of justification statements and medical radiation science-specific exemplars. Key domains identified included communication, cognitive ability, strength and mobility, professionalism, and reflective and relational skills. In contrast, sustainable performance and legal compliance were less frequently addressed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the importance of clear communication around inherent requirements and the provision of reasonable adjustments to support students. Consistency and clarity in inherent requirements are essential for ensuring that students can make informed decisions about their suitability for the medical radiation science profession. Aligning inherent requirements with required capability standards is crucial for maintaining authenticity of academic requirements and ensuring that graduates are fit to practise.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>In developing medical radiation science inherent requirements, educators should include justification statements and exemplars, clearly communicate the scope of reasonable adjustments that can be made and align inherent requirements with professional capability standards. Future research should explore students' and educators' perspectives on the implementation, enforcement of inherent requirements, and their practical role in supporting students’ coping and resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 5","pages":"Article 103098"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425002421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Inherent requirements are essential characteristics that enable students to achieve required professional capabilities. This study explores the availability and structure of medical radiation science inherent requirements, and their alignment with professional standards, across Australian tertiary institutions.

Methods

A document analysis design was employed to review publicly available inherent requirements from accredited undergraduate medical radiation science programs. The ‘READ’ approach was used. This involved (i) readying the inherent requirement statements, (ii) extracting data, (iii) analysing, and (iv) distilling data through content analysis. Data analysis and synthesis focused on availability, structure, and content of the inherent requirements.

Results

Out of 11 institutions, nine had publicly available inherent requirements. The analysis revealed variability in the structure and content of the available statements. While some institutions aligned their inherent requirements with professional standards (n = 5), there were inconsistencies in the inclusion of justification statements and medical radiation science-specific exemplars. Key domains identified included communication, cognitive ability, strength and mobility, professionalism, and reflective and relational skills. In contrast, sustainable performance and legal compliance were less frequently addressed.

Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of clear communication around inherent requirements and the provision of reasonable adjustments to support students. Consistency and clarity in inherent requirements are essential for ensuring that students can make informed decisions about their suitability for the medical radiation science profession. Aligning inherent requirements with required capability standards is crucial for maintaining authenticity of academic requirements and ensuring that graduates are fit to practise.

Implications for practice

In developing medical radiation science inherent requirements, educators should include justification statements and exemplars, clearly communicate the scope of reasonable adjustments that can be made and align inherent requirements with professional capability standards. Future research should explore students' and educators' perspectives on the implementation, enforcement of inherent requirements, and their practical role in supporting students’ coping and resilience.
了解澳大利亚医学放射学教育的内在要求:范围、结构和专业定位的文件分析
内在要求是使学生获得所需专业能力的基本特征。本研究探讨了医学辐射科学内在要求的可用性和结构,以及它们与澳大利亚高等教育机构的专业标准的一致性。方法采用文献分析设计,对经认可的医学放射学本科专业公开提供的内在要求进行评价。使用了“READ”方法。这涉及(i)准备内在需求陈述,(ii)提取数据,(iii)分析,以及(iv)通过内容分析提取数据。数据分析和综合关注于内在需求的可用性、结构和内容。结果11所院校中,有9所院校具有可公开获取的内在要求。分析揭示了现有报表在结构和内容上的可变性。虽然一些机构将其固有要求与专业标准相一致(n = 5),但在列入理由陈述和医疗辐射科学具体范例方面存在不一致之处。确定的关键领域包括沟通、认知能力、力量和流动性、专业精神、反思和关系技能。相比之下,可持续绩效和守法问题较少得到讨论。结论本研究强调了围绕内在需求进行清晰沟通以及提供合理调整以支持学生的重要性。内在要求的一致性和明确性对于确保学生能够就其是否适合医学放射科学专业作出知情决定至关重要。将内在需求与所需的能力标准保持一致对于保持学术需求的真实性和确保毕业生适合实践是至关重要的。在制定医疗辐射科学的内在要求时,教育工作者应包括理由陈述和范例,清楚地传达可进行合理调整的范围,并使内在要求与专业能力标准保持一致。未来的研究应探索学生和教育工作者对内在要求的实施和强制执行的观点,以及它们在支持学生应对和弹性方面的实际作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信