Analyzing travel behavior differences across population groups: An explainable machine learning approach with big mobility data

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yingrui Zhao, Kathleen Stewart
{"title":"Analyzing travel behavior differences across population groups: An explainable machine learning approach with big mobility data","authors":"Yingrui Zhao,&nbsp;Kathleen Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding differences in travel behavior across population groups is fundamental for fostering more comprehensive transportation systems. Big mobile device location data offers new opportunities for larger-scale finer-grained spatial analyses of human mobility. In this study, we analyzed over 3 million vehicle trips in Maryland over a two-month period in 2018 to explore travel behavior differences across income and racial groups. We employed Random Forest models combined with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to interpret how trip distribution, distance, and duration varied with demographic, socioeconomic, and built-environment features. The findings revealed important socio-spatial differences in travel behavior. Racial differences in mobility were associated with population density and indicated the presence of possible mobility segregation. Specifically, trips related to home tracts that were majority Hispanic and Black were concentrated in higher-density urban areas, while trips related to home tracts that were majority White were more dispersed across the state. Trip distance and duration models showed higher variation across income, age, and racial groups. Tracts with lower median incomes and a higher percentage of older age groups were associated with shorter trips, and tracts with a higher percentage of White population were associated with longer trip distances, particularly in rural census tracts. Additional county-level analysis showed that tracts with a higher percentage of Black population in counties with higher socio-economic status were also associated with longer travel distances. These findings demonstrate the potential of mobile device location data to identify travel behavior differences and reveal important mobility patterns, including mobility segregation, which can help guide local transportation planners in developing transportation systems that improve or expand the activity spaces of different population groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 104368"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325002595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding differences in travel behavior across population groups is fundamental for fostering more comprehensive transportation systems. Big mobile device location data offers new opportunities for larger-scale finer-grained spatial analyses of human mobility. In this study, we analyzed over 3 million vehicle trips in Maryland over a two-month period in 2018 to explore travel behavior differences across income and racial groups. We employed Random Forest models combined with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to interpret how trip distribution, distance, and duration varied with demographic, socioeconomic, and built-environment features. The findings revealed important socio-spatial differences in travel behavior. Racial differences in mobility were associated with population density and indicated the presence of possible mobility segregation. Specifically, trips related to home tracts that were majority Hispanic and Black were concentrated in higher-density urban areas, while trips related to home tracts that were majority White were more dispersed across the state. Trip distance and duration models showed higher variation across income, age, and racial groups. Tracts with lower median incomes and a higher percentage of older age groups were associated with shorter trips, and tracts with a higher percentage of White population were associated with longer trip distances, particularly in rural census tracts. Additional county-level analysis showed that tracts with a higher percentage of Black population in counties with higher socio-economic status were also associated with longer travel distances. These findings demonstrate the potential of mobile device location data to identify travel behavior differences and reveal important mobility patterns, including mobility segregation, which can help guide local transportation planners in developing transportation systems that improve or expand the activity spaces of different population groups.
分析不同人群的旅行行为差异:基于大移动数据的可解释机器学习方法
了解不同人群出行行为的差异是建立更全面的交通系统的基础。大型移动设备位置数据为更大规模、更细粒度的人类移动空间分析提供了新的机会。在这项研究中,我们分析了2018年两个月内马里兰州300多万次汽车旅行,以探索不同收入和种族群体的旅行行为差异。我们采用随机森林模型结合SHapley加性解释(SHAP)来解释旅行分布、距离和持续时间如何随人口、社会经济和建筑环境特征而变化。研究结果揭示了旅行行为中重要的社会空间差异。流动性的种族差异与人口密度有关,表明可能存在流动性隔离。具体来说,与西班牙裔和黑人居多的家庭相关的旅行集中在人口密度较高的城市地区,而与白人居多的家庭相关的旅行则分散在全州各地。旅行距离和持续时间模型显示,不同收入、年龄和种族群体的差异较大。收入中位数较低和老年群体比例较高的地区与短途旅行有关,白人人口比例较高的地区与较长的旅行距离有关,特别是在农村人口普查区。进一步的县级分析表明,在社会经济地位较高的县,黑人人口比例较高的地区也与较长的旅行距离有关。这些发现证明了移动设备位置数据在识别出行行为差异和揭示重要的出行模式(包括出行隔离)方面的潜力,这可以帮助指导当地交通规划者开发交通系统,改善或扩大不同人群的活动空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信