{"title":"Start early and pack light: Collaborative adventures in theory and experiment","authors":"Erin L. Barnhart , Elena F. Koslover","doi":"10.1016/j.semcdb.2025.103624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Collaboration between experimental and theoretical work is crucial to unraveling the complexity of living systems. To be productive, such collaborations require some often-scarce resources: most importantly, the time, manpower, and perseverance to iterate through multiple model formulations and experimental measurements. We argue that much can be learned from models which are highly simplified and initially ‘wrong’ or inconsistent with observations, and that the goal of theory in biology should not be primarily to provide a fit to existent experimental data. Instead, theoretical models should shed light on the key features of the system, providing insight on the missing pieces in our conceptual pictures and suggesting new measurements which can help fill in the gaps. Here, we describe a case-study from our own collaborative experience, focused on understanding the distribution of mitochondria in dendritic arbors. This story proceeded in an iterative manner from initial observations of dendritic structure and mitochondrial dynamics, to the construction of simple models, and back to original measurements and model refinement. Along the way, we came to appreciate some general principles for productive theory — experiment collaboration, which we proceed to highlight here.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21735,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in cell & developmental biology","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103624"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in cell & developmental biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084952125000345","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Collaboration between experimental and theoretical work is crucial to unraveling the complexity of living systems. To be productive, such collaborations require some often-scarce resources: most importantly, the time, manpower, and perseverance to iterate through multiple model formulations and experimental measurements. We argue that much can be learned from models which are highly simplified and initially ‘wrong’ or inconsistent with observations, and that the goal of theory in biology should not be primarily to provide a fit to existent experimental data. Instead, theoretical models should shed light on the key features of the system, providing insight on the missing pieces in our conceptual pictures and suggesting new measurements which can help fill in the gaps. Here, we describe a case-study from our own collaborative experience, focused on understanding the distribution of mitochondria in dendritic arbors. This story proceeded in an iterative manner from initial observations of dendritic structure and mitochondrial dynamics, to the construction of simple models, and back to original measurements and model refinement. Along the way, we came to appreciate some general principles for productive theory — experiment collaboration, which we proceed to highlight here.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology is a review journal dedicated to keeping scientists informed of developments in the field of molecular cell and developmental biology, on a topic by topic basis. Each issue is thematic in approach, devoted to an important topic of interest to cell and developmental biologists, focusing on the latest advances and their specific implications.
The aim of each issue is to provide a coordinated, readable, and lively review of a selected area, published rapidly to ensure currency.