{"title":"Analysis of autonomous vehicle buyer’s decisions: Balancing ethics with Innovation in the trolley dilemma","authors":"Youngjae Yoo , Hun Kim , Jiseob Park","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores complex decision-making processes in autonomous driving, focusing on the ethical challenges presented by the trolley dilemma and the regulatory focus theory. When faced with significant choices in autonomous driving scenarios, such as the trolley dilemma, passengers prefer to make their own decisions rather than rely on a system’s automated choices. This preference of having a choice significantly increases their trust in the technology and their willingness to purchase autonomous vehicles. No notable difference was found in the moral judgment between decisions made by participants and those made by the autonomous system. Moreover, this research highlights the influence of the regulatory focus theory, demonstrating that participants placed greater trust in the system and made safer decisions when presented with prevention-focused messages, emphasizing avoiding adverse outcomes rather than promotion-focused messages highlighting positive outcomes and aspirations. The findings suggest that the presentation of the information and decisions by autonomous vehicles can profoundly influence passengers’ ethical choices, affecting their trust in and acceptance of autonomous technology. This study contributes to the understanding of consumer behavior and ethical decision-making in the rapidly advancing domain of autonomous vehicle technology, offering valuable insight into policy-making and the future design of these systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 108175"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525002611","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores complex decision-making processes in autonomous driving, focusing on the ethical challenges presented by the trolley dilemma and the regulatory focus theory. When faced with significant choices in autonomous driving scenarios, such as the trolley dilemma, passengers prefer to make their own decisions rather than rely on a system’s automated choices. This preference of having a choice significantly increases their trust in the technology and their willingness to purchase autonomous vehicles. No notable difference was found in the moral judgment between decisions made by participants and those made by the autonomous system. Moreover, this research highlights the influence of the regulatory focus theory, demonstrating that participants placed greater trust in the system and made safer decisions when presented with prevention-focused messages, emphasizing avoiding adverse outcomes rather than promotion-focused messages highlighting positive outcomes and aspirations. The findings suggest that the presentation of the information and decisions by autonomous vehicles can profoundly influence passengers’ ethical choices, affecting their trust in and acceptance of autonomous technology. This study contributes to the understanding of consumer behavior and ethical decision-making in the rapidly advancing domain of autonomous vehicle technology, offering valuable insight into policy-making and the future design of these systems.
期刊介绍:
Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.