Fang Liu , Rong Huang , Qin Wang , Ruitao Wang , Jia Lu , Yanying Zhang , Xuejiao Ma , Xiaoyu Liu , Xudong Kong , Pengmei Li , Liqun Jia , Yanni Lou
{"title":"Leveraging readily available clinical data with machine learning to predict first-line immunotherapy outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer","authors":"Fang Liu , Rong Huang , Qin Wang , Ruitao Wang , Jia Lu , Yanying Zhang , Xuejiao Ma , Xiaoyu Liu , Xudong Kong , Pengmei Li , Liqun Jia , Yanni Lou","doi":"10.1016/j.intimp.2025.115259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are essential first-line treatments for recurrent or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, predicting their effectiveness and the occurrence of immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAEs) remains challenging.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study involved NSCLC patients who received first-line ICI therapy at China-Japan Friendship Hospital in Beijing, China, between October 29, 2018, and July 10, 2024. We employed five machine learning models to predict treatment responses to ICIs and the occurrence of irAEs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 397 NSCLC patients who received first-line ICIs were included in the analysis, with 277 patients in the train-validation cohort and 120 in the test cohort. The neural network and gradient boosting models were the most effective for predicting treatment responses, achieving AUC values of 0.87 and 0.84, respectively. For predicting irAEs, random forest and gradient boosting emerged as the top performers, with AUC values of 0.84 and 0.80. Feature importance analysis identified key predictors such as red blood cell (RBC) counts and metastatic sites for treatment response, while metastatic sites and sex were significant for irAE prediction. In the validation cohort, the neural network demonstrated strong performance in predicting treatment response (AUC of 0.84, recall of 0.8406, and F1 score of 0.8007), while the random forest model excelled in predicting irAEs (AUC of 0.82, accuracy of 0.7417, precision of 0.7500, recall of 0.8261, and F1 score of 0.7862).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings highlight the potential for enhancing personalized treatment strategies for NSCLC patients undergoing first-line ICI therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13859,"journal":{"name":"International immunopharmacology","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 115259"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International immunopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567576925012494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are essential first-line treatments for recurrent or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, predicting their effectiveness and the occurrence of immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAEs) remains challenging.
Methods
This retrospective study involved NSCLC patients who received first-line ICI therapy at China-Japan Friendship Hospital in Beijing, China, between October 29, 2018, and July 10, 2024. We employed five machine learning models to predict treatment responses to ICIs and the occurrence of irAEs.
Results
A total of 397 NSCLC patients who received first-line ICIs were included in the analysis, with 277 patients in the train-validation cohort and 120 in the test cohort. The neural network and gradient boosting models were the most effective for predicting treatment responses, achieving AUC values of 0.87 and 0.84, respectively. For predicting irAEs, random forest and gradient boosting emerged as the top performers, with AUC values of 0.84 and 0.80. Feature importance analysis identified key predictors such as red blood cell (RBC) counts and metastatic sites for treatment response, while metastatic sites and sex were significant for irAE prediction. In the validation cohort, the neural network demonstrated strong performance in predicting treatment response (AUC of 0.84, recall of 0.8406, and F1 score of 0.8007), while the random forest model excelled in predicting irAEs (AUC of 0.82, accuracy of 0.7417, precision of 0.7500, recall of 0.8261, and F1 score of 0.7862).
Conclusion
These findings highlight the potential for enhancing personalized treatment strategies for NSCLC patients undergoing first-line ICI therapy.
期刊介绍:
International Immunopharmacology is the primary vehicle for the publication of original research papers pertinent to the overlapping areas of immunology, pharmacology, cytokine biology, immunotherapy, immunopathology and immunotoxicology. Review articles that encompass these subjects are also welcome.
The subject material appropriate for submission includes:
• Clinical studies employing immunotherapy of any type including the use of: bacterial and chemical agents; thymic hormones, interferon, lymphokines, etc., in transplantation and diseases such as cancer, immunodeficiency, chronic infection and allergic, inflammatory or autoimmune disorders.
• Studies on the mechanisms of action of these agents for specific parameters of immune competence as well as the overall clinical state.
• Pre-clinical animal studies and in vitro studies on mechanisms of action with immunopotentiators, immunomodulators, immunoadjuvants and other pharmacological agents active on cells participating in immune or allergic responses.
• Pharmacological compounds, microbial products and toxicological agents that affect the lymphoid system, and their mechanisms of action.
• Agents that activate genes or modify transcription and translation within the immune response.
• Substances activated, generated, or released through immunologic or related pathways that are pharmacologically active.
• Production, function and regulation of cytokines and their receptors.
• Classical pharmacological studies on the effects of chemokines and bioactive factors released during immunological reactions.