Does carbon emission trading policy improve agricultural energy transition? Evidence from China

IF 8.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jing Rong , Quan Guo , Shikun Chen , Jinghui Hao
{"title":"Does carbon emission trading policy improve agricultural energy transition? Evidence from China","authors":"Jing Rong ,&nbsp;Quan Guo ,&nbsp;Shikun Chen ,&nbsp;Jinghui Hao","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2025.07.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The carbon emission trading (CET) policy is crucial for China to meet its goals of reaching ‘carbon peak’ and achieving ‘carbon neutrality’. However, as a market-driven environmental regulation, it remains uncertain whether the CET policy could improve the structural transition of agricultural energy consumption (AET) and what its impact mechanisms might be. This study employs provincial panel data from China between 2005 and 2022, utilizing a difference-in-differences (DID) model to explore the effect of the CET policy on AET. The CET policy has been found to significantly improve AET, based on placebo tests and robustness checks. However, the policy effects vary with regional location, the extent of labor mobility, and temporal dynamics. There are significantly positive impacts in the eastern and western regions as well as areas in China with high labor mobility. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that the CET policy’s effect on AET exhibits a time-lag, with the impact on AET progressively increasing each year after the policy takes effect. The results of the mechanism analysis indicate that agricultural green technology innovation (AGTI) could positively contribute to the CET policy’s promotion of the AET. However, we are unable to verify the influence of digital economy (DE) in this process. This study offers both theoretical over CET policy on AET, and helps identify the causal relationship between the CET policy and AET and offer insights for public policy development to support further advancements in carbon emission policy implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"87 ","pages":"Pages 1670-1689"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625003066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The carbon emission trading (CET) policy is crucial for China to meet its goals of reaching ‘carbon peak’ and achieving ‘carbon neutrality’. However, as a market-driven environmental regulation, it remains uncertain whether the CET policy could improve the structural transition of agricultural energy consumption (AET) and what its impact mechanisms might be. This study employs provincial panel data from China between 2005 and 2022, utilizing a difference-in-differences (DID) model to explore the effect of the CET policy on AET. The CET policy has been found to significantly improve AET, based on placebo tests and robustness checks. However, the policy effects vary with regional location, the extent of labor mobility, and temporal dynamics. There are significantly positive impacts in the eastern and western regions as well as areas in China with high labor mobility. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that the CET policy’s effect on AET exhibits a time-lag, with the impact on AET progressively increasing each year after the policy takes effect. The results of the mechanism analysis indicate that agricultural green technology innovation (AGTI) could positively contribute to the CET policy’s promotion of the AET. However, we are unable to verify the influence of digital economy (DE) in this process. This study offers both theoretical over CET policy on AET, and helps identify the causal relationship between the CET policy and AET and offer insights for public policy development to support further advancements in carbon emission policy implementation.
碳排放权交易政策促进农业能源转型吗?来自中国的证据
碳排放交易(CET)政策对中国实现“碳峰值”和“碳中和”目标至关重要。然而,作为一项市场驱动的环境规制,能源政策能否促进农业能源消费结构转型,其影响机制如何,仍是一个不确定的问题。本研究采用中国2005年至2022年的省级面板数据,利用差异中的差异(DID)模型探讨CET政策对AET的影响。基于安慰剂测试和稳健性检查,CET政策已被发现显著改善AET。然而,政策效果因地区位置、劳动力流动程度和时间动态而异。在东部和西部地区以及中国劳动力流动性高的地区都有显著的正向影响。此外,我们的分析表明,CET政策对AET的影响表现出时滞,政策生效后对AET的影响逐年递增。机制分析结果表明,农业绿色技术创新对科技创新的促进具有正向作用。然而,我们无法验证数字经济(DE)在这一过程中的影响。本研究不仅为CET政策对碳排放的影响提供了理论依据,而且有助于确定CET政策与碳排放之间的因果关系,并为公共政策制定提供见解,以支持进一步推进碳排放政策的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信