Risk propagation analysis of domino effect in chemical accident: An integrated approach with data mining and Bayesian networks

IF 4.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Xunqing Wang , Xiaofang Xue , William Yeoh , Xiaoyu Sun , Hu Qin
{"title":"Risk propagation analysis of domino effect in chemical accident: An integrated approach with data mining and Bayesian networks","authors":"Xunqing Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaofang Xue ,&nbsp;William Yeoh ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Sun ,&nbsp;Hu Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Domino effects in chemical process industries can lead to catastrophic consequences due to their complex, multi-stage escalation mechanisms. Existing approaches to domino accident analysis often lack integration between qualitative causal insights and quantitative modeling of risk propagation. To address this gap, this study proposes an integrated methodology that combines the grounded theory, association rule mining, and Bayesian network modeling to systematically identify and evaluate risk pathways in hazardous chemical accidents. The grounded theory analysis of historical accident reports led to the identification of five core dimensions: accident type, human error, material properties, environmental conditions, and systemic management deficiencies. Using the Apriori algorithm, 418 high-confidence association rules were extracted from leakage- and explosion-initiated disaster chains, with the sequence ‘equipment defect → leakage → explosion’ occurring in 78 % of cases. A dual-layer Bayesian network model comprising 106 nodes was constructed to quantify the interactions among causative factors. Sensitivity analysis using the expectation–maximization algorithm revealed that shockwaves (sensitivity = 0.275) and debris dispersion (0.258) are dominant contributors to secondary escalation. This study proposes an integrated approach combining data mining and Bayesian networks for analyzing risk propagation patterns of the domino effect in hazardous chemical incidents, providing insights to enhance safety resilience in high-risk chemical industries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 105745"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423025002037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Domino effects in chemical process industries can lead to catastrophic consequences due to their complex, multi-stage escalation mechanisms. Existing approaches to domino accident analysis often lack integration between qualitative causal insights and quantitative modeling of risk propagation. To address this gap, this study proposes an integrated methodology that combines the grounded theory, association rule mining, and Bayesian network modeling to systematically identify and evaluate risk pathways in hazardous chemical accidents. The grounded theory analysis of historical accident reports led to the identification of five core dimensions: accident type, human error, material properties, environmental conditions, and systemic management deficiencies. Using the Apriori algorithm, 418 high-confidence association rules were extracted from leakage- and explosion-initiated disaster chains, with the sequence ‘equipment defect → leakage → explosion’ occurring in 78 % of cases. A dual-layer Bayesian network model comprising 106 nodes was constructed to quantify the interactions among causative factors. Sensitivity analysis using the expectation–maximization algorithm revealed that shockwaves (sensitivity = 0.275) and debris dispersion (0.258) are dominant contributors to secondary escalation. This study proposes an integrated approach combining data mining and Bayesian networks for analyzing risk propagation patterns of the domino effect in hazardous chemical incidents, providing insights to enhance safety resilience in high-risk chemical industries.
化工事故多米诺效应的风险传播分析:基于数据挖掘和贝叶斯网络的综合方法
化学过程工业中的多米诺效应由于其复杂的、多阶段的升级机制,可能导致灾难性的后果。现有的多米诺骨牌事故分析方法往往缺乏定性因果洞察和风险传播定量建模之间的整合。为了解决这一差距,本研究提出了一种综合方法,将扎根理论、关联规则挖掘和贝叶斯网络建模相结合,系统地识别和评估危险化学品事故的风险路径。对历史事故报告的扎根理论分析导致五个核心维度的识别:事故类型,人为错误,材料属性,环境条件和系统管理缺陷。利用Apriori算法,从泄漏和爆炸引发的灾难链中提取了418条高置信度关联规则,其中“设备缺陷→泄漏→爆炸”的发生率为78%。构建了106个节点的双层贝叶斯网络模型,量化了致病因素之间的相互作用。利用期望最大化算法的敏感性分析表明,冲击波(敏感性= 0.275)和碎片分散(0.258)是二次升级的主要因素。本研究提出了一种结合数据挖掘和贝叶斯网络的综合方法来分析危险化学品事故中多米诺骨牌效应的风险传播模式,为提高高风险化学品行业的安全弹性提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信