Facilitators and challenges of co-creating digital public health interventions: A Health CASCADE multi-case exploratory study

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Vinayak Anand-Kumar , Margrit Schreier , Nehal Bakshi , Katrina Messiha , Giuliana Raffaella Longworth , Qingfan An , Danielle Marie Angello , Sebastien Chastin , Sonia Lippke
{"title":"Facilitators and challenges of co-creating digital public health interventions: A Health CASCADE multi-case exploratory study","authors":"Vinayak Anand-Kumar ,&nbsp;Margrit Schreier ,&nbsp;Nehal Bakshi ,&nbsp;Katrina Messiha ,&nbsp;Giuliana Raffaella Longworth ,&nbsp;Qingfan An ,&nbsp;Danielle Marie Angello ,&nbsp;Sebastien Chastin ,&nbsp;Sonia Lippke","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study identifies facilitators and challenges in the co-creation of digital health interventions for public health.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>An exploratory multiple case study design was used to analyse three co-created digital health interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were collected for three digital health interventions via expert interviews (<em>n</em> = 11), open-ended survey responses (<em>n</em> = 10), and project descriptions. Qualitative content analysis was conducted to identify common themes across cases.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Key facilitators included leveraging co-creator expertise, maintaining regular co-creator exchanges, ensuring an adaptive development process, carrying out a needs analysis and adopting a feasible design. Key challenges included resource constraints, difficult co-creator relationships, poor planning of co-creation, difficulties in recruiting and acknowledging co-creators, distributing workload fairly, and unclear expectations and skills/knowledge gap amongst co-creators.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Findings suggest that while the facilitators and challenges of digital health interventions reported here reflect previous literature relating to non-digital health interventions, digital settings present unique challenges, including effective integration of co-creators across iteration cycles and enabling collaboration across a large array of disciplines. Understanding facilitators and challenges in digital health intervention co-creation may help teams plan how to effectively include all relevant co-creators in the process. Future research should further explore how co-creation impacts digital health intervention adoption, user engagement, and long-term effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 105847"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625002938","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study identifies facilitators and challenges in the co-creation of digital health interventions for public health.

Study design

An exploratory multiple case study design was used to analyse three co-created digital health interventions.

Methods

Data were collected for three digital health interventions via expert interviews (n = 11), open-ended survey responses (n = 10), and project descriptions. Qualitative content analysis was conducted to identify common themes across cases.

Results

Key facilitators included leveraging co-creator expertise, maintaining regular co-creator exchanges, ensuring an adaptive development process, carrying out a needs analysis and adopting a feasible design. Key challenges included resource constraints, difficult co-creator relationships, poor planning of co-creation, difficulties in recruiting and acknowledging co-creators, distributing workload fairly, and unclear expectations and skills/knowledge gap amongst co-creators.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that while the facilitators and challenges of digital health interventions reported here reflect previous literature relating to non-digital health interventions, digital settings present unique challenges, including effective integration of co-creators across iteration cycles and enabling collaboration across a large array of disciplines. Understanding facilitators and challenges in digital health intervention co-creation may help teams plan how to effectively include all relevant co-creators in the process. Future research should further explore how co-creation impacts digital health intervention adoption, user engagement, and long-term effectiveness.
共同创建数字公共卫生干预措施的促进因素和挑战:健康级联多案例探索性研究
本研究确定了共同创建公共卫生数字卫生干预措施的促进因素和挑战。研究设计采用探索性多案例研究设计来分析三种共同创建的数字健康干预措施。方法通过专家访谈(n = 11)、开放式调查回复(n = 10)和项目描述收集三种数字健康干预措施的数据。进行定性内容分析以确定案例之间的共同主题。关键的促进因素包括利用共同创建者的专业知识,保持定期的共同创建者交流,确保适应性开发过程,进行需求分析和采用可行的设计。主要挑战包括资源限制、合作开发者关系困难、合作开发者计划不佳、招聘和认可合作开发者困难、公平分配工作量、合作开发者之间期望不明确、技能/知识差距等。研究结果表明,虽然本文报告的数字健康干预措施的促进因素和挑战反映了先前与非数字健康干预措施相关的文献,但数字环境提出了独特的挑战,包括跨迭代周期有效整合共同创建者,并实现跨大量学科的协作。了解数字健康干预共同创造中的促进因素和挑战可以帮助团队规划如何有效地将所有相关的共同创造者纳入这一过程。未来的研究应进一步探索共同创造如何影响数字健康干预的采用、用户参与和长期有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信