{"title":"Accidental adversaries in renewable energy projects: A system dynamics perspective on conflicts and procedural justice with local communities","authors":"Salim A. Salon , Alexander Salom , Diego Parra","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conflicts between renewable energy projects and local communities are increasingly common, yet existing research often fails to capture the dynamic and relational nature of these disputes. This study addresses this gap by developing and empirically validating a system dynamics model grounded in the “Accidental Adversaries” archetype to examine how procedural justice and cooperation evolve over time in renewable energy projects. Applying the model to the Windpeshi wind farm in La Guajira, Colombia (an area characterized by structural inequalities and indigenous resistance) this research reveals five key dynamics: (1) early aggressive project acceleration generates harm to community relations and undermines project success; (2) as projects progress, community acceptance becomes the critical driver of infrastructure completion; (3) demands for participation emerge proactively, even before formal engagement begins; (4) increasing the number of consultations does not guarantee higher community satisfaction, underscoring the importance of procedural quality over quantity; and (5) harm inflicted on communities by project decisions exceeds the harm communities cause to projects, revealing asymmetrical impacts. These findings challenge static models of public acceptance and offer actionable insights for policymakers and developers aiming to prevent or mitigate conflicts by prioritizing early, meaningful, and adaptive engagement practices. The study advances the field of energy justice by demonstrating that conflicts are not solely predetermined by historical inequalities but are dynamically shaped through evolving interactions between developers and communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104226"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962500307X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Conflicts between renewable energy projects and local communities are increasingly common, yet existing research often fails to capture the dynamic and relational nature of these disputes. This study addresses this gap by developing and empirically validating a system dynamics model grounded in the “Accidental Adversaries” archetype to examine how procedural justice and cooperation evolve over time in renewable energy projects. Applying the model to the Windpeshi wind farm in La Guajira, Colombia (an area characterized by structural inequalities and indigenous resistance) this research reveals five key dynamics: (1) early aggressive project acceleration generates harm to community relations and undermines project success; (2) as projects progress, community acceptance becomes the critical driver of infrastructure completion; (3) demands for participation emerge proactively, even before formal engagement begins; (4) increasing the number of consultations does not guarantee higher community satisfaction, underscoring the importance of procedural quality over quantity; and (5) harm inflicted on communities by project decisions exceeds the harm communities cause to projects, revealing asymmetrical impacts. These findings challenge static models of public acceptance and offer actionable insights for policymakers and developers aiming to prevent or mitigate conflicts by prioritizing early, meaningful, and adaptive engagement practices. The study advances the field of energy justice by demonstrating that conflicts are not solely predetermined by historical inequalities but are dynamically shaped through evolving interactions between developers and communities.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.