Accidental adversaries in renewable energy projects: A system dynamics perspective on conflicts and procedural justice with local communities

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Salim A. Salon , Alexander Salom , Diego Parra
{"title":"Accidental adversaries in renewable energy projects: A system dynamics perspective on conflicts and procedural justice with local communities","authors":"Salim A. Salon ,&nbsp;Alexander Salom ,&nbsp;Diego Parra","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conflicts between renewable energy projects and local communities are increasingly common, yet existing research often fails to capture the dynamic and relational nature of these disputes. This study addresses this gap by developing and empirically validating a system dynamics model grounded in the “Accidental Adversaries” archetype to examine how procedural justice and cooperation evolve over time in renewable energy projects. Applying the model to the Windpeshi wind farm in La Guajira, Colombia (an area characterized by structural inequalities and indigenous resistance) this research reveals five key dynamics: (1) early aggressive project acceleration generates harm to community relations and undermines project success; (2) as projects progress, community acceptance becomes the critical driver of infrastructure completion; (3) demands for participation emerge proactively, even before formal engagement begins; (4) increasing the number of consultations does not guarantee higher community satisfaction, underscoring the importance of procedural quality over quantity; and (5) harm inflicted on communities by project decisions exceeds the harm communities cause to projects, revealing asymmetrical impacts. These findings challenge static models of public acceptance and offer actionable insights for policymakers and developers aiming to prevent or mitigate conflicts by prioritizing early, meaningful, and adaptive engagement practices. The study advances the field of energy justice by demonstrating that conflicts are not solely predetermined by historical inequalities but are dynamically shaped through evolving interactions between developers and communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104226"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962500307X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conflicts between renewable energy projects and local communities are increasingly common, yet existing research often fails to capture the dynamic and relational nature of these disputes. This study addresses this gap by developing and empirically validating a system dynamics model grounded in the “Accidental Adversaries” archetype to examine how procedural justice and cooperation evolve over time in renewable energy projects. Applying the model to the Windpeshi wind farm in La Guajira, Colombia (an area characterized by structural inequalities and indigenous resistance) this research reveals five key dynamics: (1) early aggressive project acceleration generates harm to community relations and undermines project success; (2) as projects progress, community acceptance becomes the critical driver of infrastructure completion; (3) demands for participation emerge proactively, even before formal engagement begins; (4) increasing the number of consultations does not guarantee higher community satisfaction, underscoring the importance of procedural quality over quantity; and (5) harm inflicted on communities by project decisions exceeds the harm communities cause to projects, revealing asymmetrical impacts. These findings challenge static models of public acceptance and offer actionable insights for policymakers and developers aiming to prevent or mitigate conflicts by prioritizing early, meaningful, and adaptive engagement practices. The study advances the field of energy justice by demonstrating that conflicts are not solely predetermined by historical inequalities but are dynamically shaped through evolving interactions between developers and communities.
可再生能源项目中的意外对手:与当地社区冲突和程序正义的系统动力学观点
可再生能源项目和当地社区之间的冲突越来越普遍,然而现有的研究往往未能捕捉到这些争端的动态和关系本质。本研究通过开发和实证验证基于“意外对手”原型的系统动力学模型来解决这一差距,以研究可再生能源项目中程序正义和合作如何随着时间的推移而演变。将该模型应用于哥伦比亚La Guajira(一个以结构性不平等和土著抵抗为特征的地区)的Windpeshi风电场,该研究揭示了五个关键动态:(1)早期激进的项目加速会损害社区关系并破坏项目的成功;(2)随着项目的推进,社区接受度成为基础设施完工的关键驱动力;(3)参与需求主动出现,甚至在正式参与开始之前就出现了;(4)增加咨询次数并不能保证更高的社区满意度,强调程序质量比数量更重要;(5)项目决策对社区造成的伤害超过社区对项目造成的伤害,呈现不对称影响。这些发现挑战了公众接受度的静态模型,并为决策者和开发者提供了可操作的见解,旨在通过优先考虑早期、有意义和适应性的参与实践来预防或减轻冲突。该研究通过证明冲突不仅仅是由历史不平等决定的,而且是通过开发商和社区之间不断发展的互动动态形成的,从而推动了能源正义领域的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信