Tiffany Eatz , Chase DeLong , Ashley R. Metzler , Neil Patel , Ian A. Ramsay , Sai Sanikommu , Soumya Shrigiri , Ahmed Abdelsalam , Luis Guada , Michael A. Silva , Dileep R. Yavagal , Sebastian Koch , Robert M. Starke
{"title":"From data to impact: The societal contributions of neurological and neurosurgical national registries","authors":"Tiffany Eatz , Chase DeLong , Ashley R. Metzler , Neil Patel , Ian A. Ramsay , Sai Sanikommu , Soumya Shrigiri , Ahmed Abdelsalam , Luis Guada , Michael A. Silva , Dileep R. Yavagal , Sebastian Koch , Robert M. Starke","doi":"10.1016/j.socimp.2025.100131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The creation of the electronic medical record (EMR) was one of the greatest advancements in medical documentation. It improved the efficiency and practicality of multi-patient research, such as retrospective case series and cohort studies. While EMRs made collecting and sharing patient data feasible, the subsequent advent of patient registries provided opportunities for rapid large-scale analysis. Most recently, specialty-specific registries have enabled the biomedical workforce to focus on certain diseases, particularly neurological and neurosurgical in nature. State and nation-wide analyses of these patients have combined geographic, demographic, patient presentation, and treatment information to identify disparities in care and patient outcomes. Further optimization and expansion of discipline-specific registries can improve data collection, research, and patient care, all while facilitating national collaboration that was not previously possible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101167,"journal":{"name":"Societal Impacts","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societal Impacts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294969772500030X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The creation of the electronic medical record (EMR) was one of the greatest advancements in medical documentation. It improved the efficiency and practicality of multi-patient research, such as retrospective case series and cohort studies. While EMRs made collecting and sharing patient data feasible, the subsequent advent of patient registries provided opportunities for rapid large-scale analysis. Most recently, specialty-specific registries have enabled the biomedical workforce to focus on certain diseases, particularly neurological and neurosurgical in nature. State and nation-wide analyses of these patients have combined geographic, demographic, patient presentation, and treatment information to identify disparities in care and patient outcomes. Further optimization and expansion of discipline-specific registries can improve data collection, research, and patient care, all while facilitating national collaboration that was not previously possible.