Barriers to access diabetic retinopathy treatment in Sri Lanka: A qualitative study

D. M. Mangala Dharmapriya Bandara Dhanapala , Mapa Prabath Piyasena , M. G. L. Mahesh Premarathna , P. F. Supun Chameera Fonseka , Sairuban K , Niruththan K , Jagjit Gilhotra , Robert Casson , Upul Senarath
{"title":"Barriers to access diabetic retinopathy treatment in Sri Lanka: A qualitative study","authors":"D. M. Mangala Dharmapriya Bandara Dhanapala ,&nbsp;Mapa Prabath Piyasena ,&nbsp;M. G. L. Mahesh Premarathna ,&nbsp;P. F. Supun Chameera Fonseka ,&nbsp;Sairuban K ,&nbsp;Niruththan K ,&nbsp;Jagjit Gilhotra ,&nbsp;Robert Casson ,&nbsp;Upul Senarath","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To explore patient and service provider perceptions on diabetic retinopathy (DR), its treatment and barriers faced by patients when accessing care, in order to develop strategies to improve uptake and outcomes of DR treatment care pathway.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>A qualitative study based on 12 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 8 semi-structured interviews (SSIs) was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients were selected from three treatment care pathways: intra-vitreal injections, laser photocoagulation and vitrectomy in a tertiary care public eye hospital. Separate FGDs were conducted for males and females, as well as Sinhalese and Tamil patients, within each treatment method to examine how gender and ethnicity influenced treatment experiences and health seeking behavior. FGDs were conducted in the two main native languages separately by two experienced sociologists. The SSIs were conducted with doctors and nurses in a language preferred by each healthcare worker. A pre-defined topic guide was used in the conduction of FGDs and SSIs. The recordings of these FGDs and SSIs were transcribed and subsequently used to conduct a thematic analysis using the Socio-Ecological Model and the health systems approach as a guide. Recurring concepts were identified by review of the transcripts which informed the development of a thematic code book.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 73 patients participated in the FGDs with a majority being male (54.7 %, <em>n</em> = 40) while Sinhala was the language spoken by most (60.2 %, <em>n</em> = 44). A total of four doctors and four nurses were interviewed in the SSIs. The lack of knowledge on diabetes, DR and DR treatment modalities was identified as a key barrier to seeking early care and a significant contributor to patient dissatisfaction. In addition, inadequacy of infrastructure, lack of wayfinding signage systems in the hospital, behavior of healthcare assistants, discrimination, long waiting times, postponement of surgeries and inadequacy of information given by doctors were among many other sub-themes that were identified as barriers. Interviews with healthcare workers revealed lack of public awareness, overcrowding, lack of proper referral systems and inadequacy of opportunities for continuous professional development as major barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Multi-dimensional factors at all levels of the Socio-Ecological Model were found to act as barriers to patient care, principal among which was the lack of knowledge among patients on the impact of diabetes on the eye. Tailormade strategies to address these barriers should be implemented in order to improve quality of care. Patient education, staff training and infrastructure development should be the cornerstones among such measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253525000607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To explore patient and service provider perceptions on diabetic retinopathy (DR), its treatment and barriers faced by patients when accessing care, in order to develop strategies to improve uptake and outcomes of DR treatment care pathway.

Study Design

A qualitative study based on 12 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 8 semi-structured interviews (SSIs) was conducted.

Methods

Patients were selected from three treatment care pathways: intra-vitreal injections, laser photocoagulation and vitrectomy in a tertiary care public eye hospital. Separate FGDs were conducted for males and females, as well as Sinhalese and Tamil patients, within each treatment method to examine how gender and ethnicity influenced treatment experiences and health seeking behavior. FGDs were conducted in the two main native languages separately by two experienced sociologists. The SSIs were conducted with doctors and nurses in a language preferred by each healthcare worker. A pre-defined topic guide was used in the conduction of FGDs and SSIs. The recordings of these FGDs and SSIs were transcribed and subsequently used to conduct a thematic analysis using the Socio-Ecological Model and the health systems approach as a guide. Recurring concepts were identified by review of the transcripts which informed the development of a thematic code book.

Results

A total of 73 patients participated in the FGDs with a majority being male (54.7 %, n = 40) while Sinhala was the language spoken by most (60.2 %, n = 44). A total of four doctors and four nurses were interviewed in the SSIs. The lack of knowledge on diabetes, DR and DR treatment modalities was identified as a key barrier to seeking early care and a significant contributor to patient dissatisfaction. In addition, inadequacy of infrastructure, lack of wayfinding signage systems in the hospital, behavior of healthcare assistants, discrimination, long waiting times, postponement of surgeries and inadequacy of information given by doctors were among many other sub-themes that were identified as barriers. Interviews with healthcare workers revealed lack of public awareness, overcrowding, lack of proper referral systems and inadequacy of opportunities for continuous professional development as major barriers.

Conclusion

Multi-dimensional factors at all levels of the Socio-Ecological Model were found to act as barriers to patient care, principal among which was the lack of knowledge among patients on the impact of diabetes on the eye. Tailormade strategies to address these barriers should be implemented in order to improve quality of care. Patient education, staff training and infrastructure development should be the cornerstones among such measures.
斯里兰卡糖尿病视网膜病变治疗的障碍:一项定性研究
目的探讨患者和服务提供者对糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的认知、治疗方法以及患者在获得护理时面临的障碍,以制定策略来提高DR治疗护理途径的接受度和效果。研究设计进行了一项基于12个焦点小组讨论(fgd)和8个半结构化访谈(ssi)的定性研究。方法选择某三级公立眼科医院玻璃体内注射、激光光凝和玻璃体切除术三种治疗护理途径的患者。在每种治疗方法中,分别对男性和女性以及僧伽罗人和泰米尔人患者进行了fgd,以检查性别和种族如何影响治疗经历和寻求健康的行为。FGDs由两位经验丰富的社会学家分别以两种主要的母语进行。ssi由医生和护士以每个卫生保健工作者喜欢的语言进行。预先定义的主题指南用于FGDs和ssi的传导。对这些fgd和ssi的记录进行转录,随后以社会生态模型和卫生系统方法为指导,用于进行专题分析。通过审查抄本确定了重复出现的概念,这些抄本为编写专题代码书提供了资料。结果共有73例患者参加了FGDs,其中男性居多(54.7%,n = 40),僧伽罗语居多(60.2%,n = 44)。在ssi共采访了4名医生和4名护士。缺乏关于糖尿病、DR和DR治疗方式的知识被认为是寻求早期治疗的主要障碍,也是患者不满意的一个重要因素。此外,基础设施不足、医院缺乏路标系统、医疗助理的行为、歧视、等待时间过长、手术推迟以及医生提供的信息不足等问题也被确定为障碍。对卫生保健工作者的采访显示,缺乏公众意识、过度拥挤、缺乏适当的转诊系统和持续专业发展机会不足是主要障碍。结论社会生态模型各层次的多维因素对患者护理存在障碍,其中最主要的是患者对糖尿病对眼睛的影响缺乏认识。应实施针对这些障碍的量身定制战略,以提高护理质量。患者教育、工作人员培训和基础设施发展应成为这些措施的基石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信