Biomechanics of interfaces for cemented joint replacements: A systematic review

Ajay Kumar
{"title":"Biomechanics of interfaces for cemented joint replacements: A systematic review","authors":"Ajay Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The fixation of cemented implants in joint replacement procedures involves two critical interfaces: the bone-cement interface and the cement-implant interface. Although cemented implants—such as those used in hip, shoulder, elbow, vertebrae, knee, and ankle arthroplasty—are often preferred over uncemented ones in specific patient populations, failure can still occur due to suboptimal interfacial conditions. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the interfacial factors influencing mechanical integrity and long-term implant performance is essential for orthopaedic surgeons, clinicians, and biomedical researchers. This review focuses on evaluating the role of key factors in relation to interfacial failure mechanisms, debonding strength, fracture behaviour, implant stability, and revision rates of cemented implants. Key interfacial characteristics, including interfacial friction, surface coatings, surface roughness, groove geometry, porosity, cement spacers, implant design, cement viscosity, mantle thickness, and penetration depth, have been identified as major contributors to the interfacial mechanical integrity of cemented implants. Emphasizing the mechanical behaviour and structural integrity of the bone-cement and cement-implant interfaces, this study presents a biomechanical perspective to enhance the understanding of orthopaedic applications. The review incorporates findings from experimental, computational, and clinical follow-up studies, highlighting the role of PMMA bone cement in improving interfacial biomechanics. Moreover, it identifies critical research gaps and methodological limitations within existing literature. Addressing these gaps through future investigations will contribute to optimizing the fixation, stability, and long-term performance of cemented implants in clinical settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100958,"journal":{"name":"Next Materials","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100943"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949822825004617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fixation of cemented implants in joint replacement procedures involves two critical interfaces: the bone-cement interface and the cement-implant interface. Although cemented implants—such as those used in hip, shoulder, elbow, vertebrae, knee, and ankle arthroplasty—are often preferred over uncemented ones in specific patient populations, failure can still occur due to suboptimal interfacial conditions. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the interfacial factors influencing mechanical integrity and long-term implant performance is essential for orthopaedic surgeons, clinicians, and biomedical researchers. This review focuses on evaluating the role of key factors in relation to interfacial failure mechanisms, debonding strength, fracture behaviour, implant stability, and revision rates of cemented implants. Key interfacial characteristics, including interfacial friction, surface coatings, surface roughness, groove geometry, porosity, cement spacers, implant design, cement viscosity, mantle thickness, and penetration depth, have been identified as major contributors to the interfacial mechanical integrity of cemented implants. Emphasizing the mechanical behaviour and structural integrity of the bone-cement and cement-implant interfaces, this study presents a biomechanical perspective to enhance the understanding of orthopaedic applications. The review incorporates findings from experimental, computational, and clinical follow-up studies, highlighting the role of PMMA bone cement in improving interfacial biomechanics. Moreover, it identifies critical research gaps and methodological limitations within existing literature. Addressing these gaps through future investigations will contribute to optimizing the fixation, stability, and long-term performance of cemented implants in clinical settings.
骨水泥关节置换术界面生物力学研究综述
关节置换术中骨水泥植入物的固定涉及两个关键界面:骨-水泥界面和水泥-种植体界面。尽管在特定患者群体中,骨水泥植入物(如用于髋关节、肩部、肘部、椎骨、膝关节和踝关节置换术的植入物)通常比未骨水泥植入物更受欢迎,但由于界面条件不理想,仍然可能发生失败。因此,全面了解影响机械完整性和长期植入物性能的界面因素对骨科医生、临床医生和生物医学研究人员至关重要。这篇综述的重点是评估与界面破坏机制、脱粘强度、断裂行为、种植体稳定性和骨水泥种植体修复率相关的关键因素的作用。关键的界面特征,包括界面摩擦、表面涂层、表面粗糙度、沟槽几何形状、孔隙度、水泥间隔物、植入物设计、水泥粘度、地幔厚度和渗透深度,已被确定为影响骨水泥植入物界面机械完整性的主要因素。强调骨水泥和骨水泥-种植体界面的力学行为和结构完整性,本研究提出了生物力学的观点,以加强对骨科应用的理解。这篇综述结合了实验、计算和临床随访研究的结果,强调了PMMA骨水泥在改善界面生物力学方面的作用。此外,它还指出了现有文献中关键的研究差距和方法局限性。通过未来的研究解决这些空白将有助于优化临床环境中骨水泥种植体的固定、稳定性和长期性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信