Association of social vulnerability with access to treatment in ovarian cancer patients

IF 1.3 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nikita Bastin , Marc Robinson , Amir Javid , Lauren S. Prescott , Alaina J. Brown
{"title":"Association of social vulnerability with access to treatment in ovarian cancer patients","authors":"Nikita Bastin ,&nbsp;Marc Robinson ,&nbsp;Amir Javid ,&nbsp;Lauren S. Prescott ,&nbsp;Alaina J. Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2025.101808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To understand disparities in access to treatment for ovarian cancer patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of patients who had surgery for ovarian cancer at a comprehensive cancer center from 2018 to 2024 was completed. Social Vulnerability index quartiles generated by patients’ zip codes were used as measures of social vulnerability. Social vulnerability encompasses four themes, including socioeconomic status, household characteristics, racial/ethnic minority status, and housing type and transportation. The primary outcome was time to treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes included time to chemotherapy, time to surgery, time to palliative care treatment, and progression-free survival. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between social vulnerability and treatment access.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 166 ovarian cancer patients, there was a trend towards increased time from diagnosis to treatment amongst patients with the highest social vulnerability (median 40 days) when compared to those with lower social vulnerability (median 22 – 27 days). When examining specific treatments received, patients with lower social vulnerability were more likely to experience shorter times to chemotherapy (median 29.5–32 days) when compared to patients with higher social vulnerability (median 41 – 45 days). Patients with the highest social vulnerability experienced the longest time to surgery (median 128 days) amongst all quartiles. There was a trend towards shorter times from diagnosis to palliative care consultation for patients of higher social vulnerability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Higher social vulnerability was associated with longer times to curative treatment and shorter times to palliative care consultation among ovarian cancer patients. Further study in more diverse patient populations is necessary to ensure the equitable delivery of care in ovarian cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 101808"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235257892500133X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To understand disparities in access to treatment for ovarian cancer patients.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who had surgery for ovarian cancer at a comprehensive cancer center from 2018 to 2024 was completed. Social Vulnerability index quartiles generated by patients’ zip codes were used as measures of social vulnerability. Social vulnerability encompasses four themes, including socioeconomic status, household characteristics, racial/ethnic minority status, and housing type and transportation. The primary outcome was time to treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes included time to chemotherapy, time to surgery, time to palliative care treatment, and progression-free survival. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between social vulnerability and treatment access.

Results

Among 166 ovarian cancer patients, there was a trend towards increased time from diagnosis to treatment amongst patients with the highest social vulnerability (median 40 days) when compared to those with lower social vulnerability (median 22 – 27 days). When examining specific treatments received, patients with lower social vulnerability were more likely to experience shorter times to chemotherapy (median 29.5–32 days) when compared to patients with higher social vulnerability (median 41 – 45 days). Patients with the highest social vulnerability experienced the longest time to surgery (median 128 days) amongst all quartiles. There was a trend towards shorter times from diagnosis to palliative care consultation for patients of higher social vulnerability.

Conclusions

Higher social vulnerability was associated with longer times to curative treatment and shorter times to palliative care consultation among ovarian cancer patients. Further study in more diverse patient populations is necessary to ensure the equitable delivery of care in ovarian cancer.
社会脆弱性与卵巢癌患者获得治疗的关系
目的了解卵巢癌患者治疗可及性的差异。方法回顾性分析2018 - 2024年在某综合癌症中心接受手术治疗的卵巢癌患者。社会脆弱性指数四分位数由患者的邮政编码产生作为社会脆弱性的措施。社会脆弱性包括四个主题,包括社会经济地位、家庭特征、种族/少数民族地位、住房类型和交通。主要终点是开始治疗的时间。次要结局包括化疗时间、手术时间、姑息治疗时间和无进展生存期。采用Logistic回归评估社会脆弱性与治疗可及性之间的关系。结果166例卵巢癌患者中,社会脆弱性最高的患者(中位40天)比社会脆弱性较低的患者(中位22 ~ 27天)从诊断到治疗的时间有增加的趋势。当检查所接受的特定治疗时,与社会脆弱性较高的患者(中位41 - 45天)相比,社会脆弱性较低的患者更有可能经历更短的化疗时间(中位29.5-32天)。在所有四分位数中,社会脆弱性最高的患者经历了最长的手术时间(中位数128天)。对于社会脆弱性较高的患者,从诊断到姑息治疗咨询的时间有缩短的趋势。结论社会脆弱性越高,卵巢癌患者接受治愈治疗的时间越长,接受姑息治疗的时间越短。有必要在更多样化的患者群体中进行进一步研究,以确保公平地提供卵巢癌护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信