Counterfactual communication not achieved yet – A Comment on Salih et al. (2022)

IF 6.6 1区物理与天体物理 Q1 PHYSICS, APPLIED

npj Quantum Information Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1038/s41534-025-00975-5

Sandu Popescu

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this comment I argue that there are two major issues with the protocol presented in “The laws of physics do not prohibit counterfactual communication”, Hatim Salih, Will McCutcheon, Jonte R. Hance and John Rarity, npj Quantum Information (2022) 8:60. One is an erroneous interpretation of the role of clicks in detector D₀ and the second is the way in which post-selection is used. I argue that these invalidate the claims of that paper.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

反事实沟通尚未实现——对Salih等人的评论（2022）

在这篇评论中，我认为在“物理定律不禁止反事实通信”中提出的协议有两个主要问题，Hatim Salih, Will McCutcheon, Jonte R. Hance和John rare， npj Quantum Information(2022) 8:60。一个是对点击在检测器D0中的作用的错误解释，第二个是使用后选择的方式。我认为这些使那篇论文的主张无效。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

npj Quantum Information Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

13.70

自引率

3.90%

发文量

130

审稿时长

29 weeks

期刊介绍： The scope of npj Quantum Information spans across all relevant disciplines, fields, approaches and levels and so considers outstanding work ranging from fundamental research to applications and technologies.