Pedagogical approaches to promote self-regulation in musical instrument learning: A PRISMA scoping review

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 0 MUSIC
Dora Utermohl de Queiroz, Clarissa Foletto, Guadalupe López-Íñiguez
{"title":"Pedagogical approaches to promote self-regulation in musical instrument learning: A PRISMA scoping review","authors":"Dora Utermohl de Queiroz, Clarissa Foletto, Guadalupe López-Íñiguez","doi":"10.1177/03057356251348414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This scoping review addresses empirical work on pedagogical approaches to promoting self-regulated learning (SRL) in musical instrument learning. This work sought to investigate (1) the types of approaches that were considered by studies to be SRL promoters, (2) how they were applied, and (3) the effects of each type of approach on student learning and performance. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we searched four databases and 30 specialised journals. This process returned 934 records. After analysing these records, we selected 17 studies that met our inclusion criteria. The results show a variety of pedagogical approaches to developing SRL skills. Teaching practices ranged from self-regulation instructions to tools such as practice journals and digital tools (e.g., electronic portfolios, software applications). Most of the selected studies demonstrated the beneficial effect of SRL teaching approaches on students’ outcomes. Thus, the findings suggest that both pedagogical approaches (self-regulation instruction and tools) can foster SRL. Furthermore, the findings indicate a gap in research on self-regulation pedagogical approaches in different contexts beyond face-to-face teaching, including online and hybrid environments. In addition, the effects of long-term interventions utilising these approaches on students’ learning remain underexplored.","PeriodicalId":47977,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Music","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Music","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356251348414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This scoping review addresses empirical work on pedagogical approaches to promoting self-regulated learning (SRL) in musical instrument learning. This work sought to investigate (1) the types of approaches that were considered by studies to be SRL promoters, (2) how they were applied, and (3) the effects of each type of approach on student learning and performance. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we searched four databases and 30 specialised journals. This process returned 934 records. After analysing these records, we selected 17 studies that met our inclusion criteria. The results show a variety of pedagogical approaches to developing SRL skills. Teaching practices ranged from self-regulation instructions to tools such as practice journals and digital tools (e.g., electronic portfolios, software applications). Most of the selected studies demonstrated the beneficial effect of SRL teaching approaches on students’ outcomes. Thus, the findings suggest that both pedagogical approaches (self-regulation instruction and tools) can foster SRL. Furthermore, the findings indicate a gap in research on self-regulation pedagogical approaches in different contexts beyond face-to-face teaching, including online and hybrid environments. In addition, the effects of long-term interventions utilising these approaches on students’ learning remain underexplored.
促进乐器学习自我调节的教学方法:PRISMA范围审查
这一范围审查解决了在乐器学习中促进自我调节学习(SRL)的教学方法的实证工作。这项工作旨在调查(1)被研究认为是SRL促进因素的方法类型,(2)它们是如何应用的,以及(3)每种方法对学生学习和表现的影响。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR),我们检索了4个数据库和30种专业期刊。这个进程返回934条记录。在分析这些记录后,我们选择了17项符合我们纳入标准的研究。结果显示了发展SRL技能的各种教学方法。教学实践的范围从自我规范指导到实践日志和数字工具(例如,电子作品集、软件应用程序)等工具。所选的大多数研究都证明了SRL教学方法对学生成绩的有益影响。因此,研究结果表明,两种教学方法(自我调节教学和工具)都可以促进自主学习。此外,研究结果表明,在面对面教学之外的不同背景下(包括在线和混合环境),自我调节教学方法的研究存在差距。此外,利用这些方法的长期干预对学生学习的影响仍未得到充分探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
17.60%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Psychology of Music and SEMPRE provide an international forum for researchers working in the fields of psychology of music and music education, to encourage the exchange of ideas and to disseminate research findings. Psychology of Music publishes peer-reviewed papers directed at increasing the scientific understanding of any psychological aspect of music. These include studies on listening, performing, creating, memorising, analysing, describing, learning, and teaching, as well as applied social, developmental, attitudinal and therapeutic studies. Special emphasis is placed on studies carried out in naturalistic settings, especially those which address the interface between music psychology and music education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信