A generative model of personality disorder as a relational disorder.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Orestis Zavlis,Michael Moutoussis,Peter Fonagy,Giles Story
{"title":"A generative model of personality disorder as a relational disorder.","authors":"Orestis Zavlis,Michael Moutoussis,Peter Fonagy,Giles Story","doi":"10.1037/abn0001010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing models of personality disorder are statistical models: dispersion patterns of personality facets. Although useful in describing personality differences, such models fall short in terms of explaining those differences. Generative models can address these explanatory gaps by explicating the mechanisms that generate descriptive pathologies. In this article, we aim to move beyond the former descriptive models and toward the latter explanatory ones. To do so, we formalize personality pathology using a generative model with four key properties. First, it is probabilistic: it outlines how humans leverage uncertainty to make sense of their own and others' ways of being. Second, it is relational: it posits that personality pathology is about poor ways of experiencing and relating to the self and others. Third, it is hierarchical: it accounts for the multiplicity of self- and other-states (in the here-and-now) and traits (in the long run). Finally, it is dynamic: it outlines how these properties evolve over time, accounting for the development of personality. By simulating data from this model, we demonstrate how it can account for the generation, maintenance, and treatment of various personality problems (from borderline instability to narcissistic grandiosity) by formalizing them as relational problems: problems with navigating relationships. We thus discuss how our model could be used to address recent debates on what is central to personality pathology by clarifying the distinction between description (what personality \"is\") and explanation (what personality \"does\"). We conclude the article with a tutorial on our model and suggestions for future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing models of personality disorder are statistical models: dispersion patterns of personality facets. Although useful in describing personality differences, such models fall short in terms of explaining those differences. Generative models can address these explanatory gaps by explicating the mechanisms that generate descriptive pathologies. In this article, we aim to move beyond the former descriptive models and toward the latter explanatory ones. To do so, we formalize personality pathology using a generative model with four key properties. First, it is probabilistic: it outlines how humans leverage uncertainty to make sense of their own and others' ways of being. Second, it is relational: it posits that personality pathology is about poor ways of experiencing and relating to the self and others. Third, it is hierarchical: it accounts for the multiplicity of self- and other-states (in the here-and-now) and traits (in the long run). Finally, it is dynamic: it outlines how these properties evolve over time, accounting for the development of personality. By simulating data from this model, we demonstrate how it can account for the generation, maintenance, and treatment of various personality problems (from borderline instability to narcissistic grandiosity) by formalizing them as relational problems: problems with navigating relationships. We thus discuss how our model could be used to address recent debates on what is central to personality pathology by clarifying the distinction between description (what personality "is") and explanation (what personality "does"). We conclude the article with a tutorial on our model and suggestions for future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
人格障碍作为一种关系障碍的生成模型。
现有的人格障碍模型是统计模型:人格方面的分散模式。尽管这些模型在描述性格差异方面很有用,但在解释这些差异方面却存在不足。生成模型可以通过解释产生描述性病理的机制来解决这些解释差距。在本文中,我们的目标是超越前一种描述性模型,转向后一种解释性模型。为此,我们使用具有四个关键属性的生成模型形式化人格病理学。首先,它是概率性的:它概述了人类如何利用不确定性来理解自己和他人的存在方式。其次,它是关系的:它假设人格病理学是关于体验自我和与他人联系的糟糕方式。第三,它是分层的:它解释了自我和他者状态(此时此地)和特征(长期而言)的多样性。最后,它是动态的:它概述了这些属性如何随着时间的推移而演变,说明了个性的发展。通过模拟该模型中的数据,我们展示了它如何通过将各种人格问题形式化为关系问题(导航关系的问题)来解释各种人格问题(从边缘不稳定到自恋自大)的产生、维护和治疗。因此,我们将讨论如何通过澄清描述(人格“是什么”)和解释(人格“做什么”)之间的区别,利用我们的模型来解决最近关于什么是人格病理学核心的争论。最后,我们对我们的模型进行了指导,并对未来的研究提出了建议。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信