Disrupted selves in transition: How women navigate fertility treatments in the context of work.

IF 9.4 1区 心理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Nada Basir,Jamie J Ladge,Serena Sohrab
{"title":"Disrupted selves in transition: How women navigate fertility treatments in the context of work.","authors":"Nada Basir,Jamie J Ladge,Serena Sohrab","doi":"10.1037/apl0001310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The challenges of managing the transition to motherhood for working women have been well documented. However, less is known about women whose transition to motherhood is disrupted, stalled, or never realized through complex fertility journeys. This qualitative study explores how 41 working women undergoing fertility treatments experience cross-domain identity challenges that threaten both their desired maternal and professional identities. Through disruptions to initiated identity transitions, participants face three types of cross-domain interferences-embodied, emotional, and cognitive-that create ongoing threats to their desired selves. Unlike typical liminal periods that facilitate identity exploration, we find that repeated fertility treatment disruptions actually erode women's ability to engage in identity play and envision possible selves. This leads to perpetual liminality, where women must make identity trade-offs as their maternal aspirations become increasingly difficult to achieve. Whether fertility treatments succeed or fail, the experience creates a \"lingering self\" that permanently shapes both personal and professional identities. Our findings extend research on liminality by revealing how extended liminal states can constrain rather than enhance identity exploration, challenging assumptions about the exploratory potential of transitional periods. We also contribute to work-life literature by illuminating how stalled personal identity transitions create unique cross-domain interferences distinct from traditional work-family conflict. These insights suggest organizations need more comprehensive support systems that address the complex, extended nature of fertility journeys while recognizing their lasting impact on employees' sense of self. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Psychology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001310","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The challenges of managing the transition to motherhood for working women have been well documented. However, less is known about women whose transition to motherhood is disrupted, stalled, or never realized through complex fertility journeys. This qualitative study explores how 41 working women undergoing fertility treatments experience cross-domain identity challenges that threaten both their desired maternal and professional identities. Through disruptions to initiated identity transitions, participants face three types of cross-domain interferences-embodied, emotional, and cognitive-that create ongoing threats to their desired selves. Unlike typical liminal periods that facilitate identity exploration, we find that repeated fertility treatment disruptions actually erode women's ability to engage in identity play and envision possible selves. This leads to perpetual liminality, where women must make identity trade-offs as their maternal aspirations become increasingly difficult to achieve. Whether fertility treatments succeed or fail, the experience creates a "lingering self" that permanently shapes both personal and professional identities. Our findings extend research on liminality by revealing how extended liminal states can constrain rather than enhance identity exploration, challenging assumptions about the exploratory potential of transitional periods. We also contribute to work-life literature by illuminating how stalled personal identity transitions create unique cross-domain interferences distinct from traditional work-family conflict. These insights suggest organizations need more comprehensive support systems that address the complex, extended nature of fertility journeys while recognizing their lasting impact on employees' sense of self. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
转型中被打乱的自我:女性如何在工作背景下进行生育治疗。
对职业妇女来说,管理过渡到母亲的挑战已经有了充分的记录。然而,对于那些在复杂的生育过程中被中断、停滞或从未实现向母亲过渡的妇女,人们所知甚少。本定性研究探讨了41名接受生育治疗的职业女性如何经历跨领域身份挑战,这些挑战威胁到她们所期望的母亲身份和职业身份。通过对初始身份转换的破坏,参与者面临三种类型的跨领域干扰——具体化的、情感的和认知的——这些干扰会对他们期望的自我产生持续的威胁。与促进身份探索的典型阈限期不同,我们发现反复的生育治疗中断实际上削弱了女性参与身份游戏和设想可能自我的能力。这导致了永久的限制,当女性的母性愿望越来越难以实现时,她们必须在身份上做出权衡。无论生育治疗成功还是失败,这种经历都创造了一个“挥之不去的自我”,永久地塑造了个人和职业身份。我们的发现通过揭示扩展的阈限状态如何限制而不是增强身份探索,从而扩展了对阈限的研究,挑战了关于过渡时期探索潜力的假设。我们还通过阐释停滞不前的个人身份转换如何产生独特的跨领域干扰,从而为工作与生活的文献做出贡献,这种干扰与传统的工作与家庭冲突截然不同。这些见解表明,组织需要更全面的支持系统,以解决生育旅程的复杂性和延展性,同时认识到它们对员工自我意识的持久影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Psychology® focuses on publishing original investigations that contribute new knowledge and understanding to fields of applied psychology (excluding clinical and applied experimental or human factors, which are better suited for other APA journals). The journal primarily considers empirical and theoretical investigations that enhance understanding of cognitive, motivational, affective, and behavioral psychological phenomena in work and organizational settings. These phenomena can occur at individual, group, organizational, or cultural levels, and in various work settings such as business, education, training, health, service, government, or military institutions. The journal welcomes submissions from both public and private sector organizations, for-profit or nonprofit. It publishes several types of articles, including: 1.Rigorously conducted empirical investigations that expand conceptual understanding (original investigations or meta-analyses). 2.Theory development articles and integrative conceptual reviews that synthesize literature and generate new theories on psychological phenomena to stimulate novel research. 3.Rigorously conducted qualitative research on phenomena that are challenging to capture with quantitative methods or require inductive theory building.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信