Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Relapses Show Diverse Genomic Profiles but Convergence in Bacteremia-Associated Genes.

Brooke M Talbot,Natasia F Jacko,Katrina S Hofstetter,Tara Alahakoon,Kevin Bouiller,Timothy D Read,Michael Z David
{"title":"Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Relapses Show Diverse Genomic Profiles but Convergence in Bacteremia-Associated Genes.","authors":"Brooke M Talbot,Natasia F Jacko,Katrina S Hofstetter,Tara Alahakoon,Kevin Bouiller,Timothy D Read,Michael Z David","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiaf352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nRecurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is a high risk complication for patients. Distinguishing persistent lineages from new infections is not standardized across clinical studies.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe investigated factors contributing to recurrence of MRSA bacteremia among subjects in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Subject demographics and clinical history were collected and paired with whole-genome sequences of infection isolates. Recurrent bacteremia episodes were recorded and defined as relapse infections (same lineage) or new infections by genomic criteria, where a relapse contained isolates ≤ 25 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) different, and by clinical criteria. All isolates were assessed for pairwise SNP distances, common mutations, and signatures of within-host adaptation using the McDonald-Kreitman test. Clusters of transmission between relapse-associated isolates and other subject lineages were identified.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong 411 sequential subjects with MRSA bacteremia, 32 experienced recurrent bacteremia episodes, with 24 subjects having exclusively relapse infections, 6 with infections exclusively from a new strain, and 2 patients with both relapse and new infections. No concordance between a genomic and a clinical definition of relapse was evident (Cohen κ = 0.18; confidence interval, -0.41). Recurrence-associated lineages exhibited signatures of positive selection (G test, < 0.01). Genes with SNPs occurring in multiple relapse lineages have roles in antibiotic resistance and virulence, including 5 lineages with mutations in mprF and 3 lineages with mutations in rpoB, which corresponded with evolved phenotypic changes in daptomycin and rifampin resistance.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nRecurrent infections have a diverse strain background. Relapses can be readily distinguished from newly acquired infections using genomic sequencing but not clinical criteria.","PeriodicalId":501010,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Recurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is a high risk complication for patients. Distinguishing persistent lineages from new infections is not standardized across clinical studies. METHODS We investigated factors contributing to recurrence of MRSA bacteremia among subjects in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Subject demographics and clinical history were collected and paired with whole-genome sequences of infection isolates. Recurrent bacteremia episodes were recorded and defined as relapse infections (same lineage) or new infections by genomic criteria, where a relapse contained isolates ≤ 25 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) different, and by clinical criteria. All isolates were assessed for pairwise SNP distances, common mutations, and signatures of within-host adaptation using the McDonald-Kreitman test. Clusters of transmission between relapse-associated isolates and other subject lineages were identified. RESULTS Among 411 sequential subjects with MRSA bacteremia, 32 experienced recurrent bacteremia episodes, with 24 subjects having exclusively relapse infections, 6 with infections exclusively from a new strain, and 2 patients with both relapse and new infections. No concordance between a genomic and a clinical definition of relapse was evident (Cohen κ = 0.18; confidence interval, -0.41). Recurrence-associated lineages exhibited signatures of positive selection (G test, < 0.01). Genes with SNPs occurring in multiple relapse lineages have roles in antibiotic resistance and virulence, including 5 lineages with mutations in mprF and 3 lineages with mutations in rpoB, which corresponded with evolved phenotypic changes in daptomycin and rifampin resistance. CONCLUSIONS Recurrent infections have a diverse strain background. Relapses can be readily distinguished from newly acquired infections using genomic sequencing but not clinical criteria.
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症复发表现出不同的基因组谱,但菌血症相关基因趋同。
背景:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌血症复发是患者的高风险并发症。在临床研究中,区分持续性谱系和新发感染并没有标准化。方法我们在宾夕法尼亚州费城调查导致MRSA菌血症复发的因素。收集受试者人口统计资料和临床病史,并与感染分离株的全基因组序列配对。记录复发性菌血症发作,并根据基因组标准将其定义为复发感染(同一谱系)或新感染,其中复发包含≤25个不同的单核苷酸多态性(SNP),并根据临床标准。使用McDonald-Kreitman测试评估所有分离株的成对SNP距离、共同突变和宿主内适应特征。在复发相关的分离株和其他主体谱系之间发现了传播集群。结果411例MRSA菌血症患者中,32例复发菌血症发作,24例单纯复发感染,6例单纯新菌株感染,2例既有复发又有新感染。复发的基因组和临床定义之间没有明显的一致性(Cohen κ = 0.18;置信区间为-0.41)。复发相关谱系表现出阳性选择特征(G检验,< 0.01)。在多个复发谱系中出现的snp基因在抗生素耐药和毒力中起作用,包括5个mprF突变谱系和3个rpoB突变谱系,这与进化的达托霉素和利福平耐药表型变化相对应。结论复发性感染具有多种菌株背景。复发可以很容易地与新获得性感染区分使用基因组测序,但不是临床标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信