Risk of serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease or bronchiectasis: A comparative cohort study.

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Qianru Zhang,Ying Qi,Xiaosong Wang,Gregory C McDermott,Sung Hae Chang,Mark Chaballa,Vadim Khaychuk,Misti L Paudel,Jeffrey A Sparks
{"title":"Risk of serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease or bronchiectasis: A comparative cohort study.","authors":"Qianru Zhang,Ying Qi,Xiaosong Wang,Gregory C McDermott,Sung Hae Chang,Mark Chaballa,Vadim Khaychuk,Misti L Paudel,Jeffrey A Sparks","doi":"10.1002/art.43338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo investigate the association between rheumatoid arthritis-associated lung disease (RA-LD) and serious infection risk.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the MGB Biobank (Boston, Massachusetts), comparing RA-LD to RA patients without lung disease (RA-no LD), matched by age, sex, and RA duration. RA-LD cases were verified by medical record review and chest imaging for clinically apparent RA-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) and/or RA-associated bronchiectasis (RA-BR). The primary outcome was serious infection. Incidence rates and propensity score-adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (sdHR) were calculated using Fine and Gray models to account for competing risk of death.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong 221 RA-LD cases (151 RA-ILD and 70 RA-BR) and 980 RA-no LD comparators, RA-LD had a significantly higher serious infection risk compared to RA-no LD comparators (55.8 vs. 25.8 per 1,000 person-years, sdHR 1.60, 95%CI 1.20-2.12). The increased risk remained significant for RA-ILD cases (sdHR 1.79, 95%CI 1.33-2.41), but not for RA-BR (sdHR 1.19, 95%CI 0.72-1.97). Anatomic sites of infection that were more common in RA-LD included pulmonary, skin and soft tissue, and ear, nose and throat; RA-LD was associated with various pathogen types: virus, bacteria, fungus, and mycobacteria. Specific pathogens with higher frequency in RA-LD cases, particularly among RA-BR, included influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and nontuberculous mycobacteria.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nRA-LD, particularly RA-ILD, is associated with a significant increased risk of serious infection across anatomic sites and diverse pathogen types. RA-BR is associated with increased pulmonary infections. Prospective studies and trials are needed to clarify optimal approaches to treat patients with RA-LD and reduce infection risk.","PeriodicalId":129,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.43338","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between rheumatoid arthritis-associated lung disease (RA-LD) and serious infection risk. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the MGB Biobank (Boston, Massachusetts), comparing RA-LD to RA patients without lung disease (RA-no LD), matched by age, sex, and RA duration. RA-LD cases were verified by medical record review and chest imaging for clinically apparent RA-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) and/or RA-associated bronchiectasis (RA-BR). The primary outcome was serious infection. Incidence rates and propensity score-adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (sdHR) were calculated using Fine and Gray models to account for competing risk of death. RESULTS Among 221 RA-LD cases (151 RA-ILD and 70 RA-BR) and 980 RA-no LD comparators, RA-LD had a significantly higher serious infection risk compared to RA-no LD comparators (55.8 vs. 25.8 per 1,000 person-years, sdHR 1.60, 95%CI 1.20-2.12). The increased risk remained significant for RA-ILD cases (sdHR 1.79, 95%CI 1.33-2.41), but not for RA-BR (sdHR 1.19, 95%CI 0.72-1.97). Anatomic sites of infection that were more common in RA-LD included pulmonary, skin and soft tissue, and ear, nose and throat; RA-LD was associated with various pathogen types: virus, bacteria, fungus, and mycobacteria. Specific pathogens with higher frequency in RA-LD cases, particularly among RA-BR, included influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and nontuberculous mycobacteria. CONCLUSION RA-LD, particularly RA-ILD, is associated with a significant increased risk of serious infection across anatomic sites and diverse pathogen types. RA-BR is associated with increased pulmonary infections. Prospective studies and trials are needed to clarify optimal approaches to treat patients with RA-LD and reduce infection risk.
类风湿关节炎相关间质性肺疾病或支气管扩张患者严重感染的风险:一项比较队列研究
目的探讨类风湿关节炎相关性肺部疾病(RA-LD)与严重感染风险的关系。方法:我们使用MGB生物银行(波士顿,马萨诸塞州)进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较RA-LD和无肺部疾病(RA-no -LD)的RA患者,按年龄、性别和RA持续时间匹配。RA-LD病例通过病历回顾和临床明显ra相关性间质性肺病(RA-ILD)和/或ra相关性支气管扩张(RA-BR)的胸部影像学检查得到证实。主要结局为严重感染。使用Fine和Gray模型计算发病率和倾向评分调整后的亚分布风险比(sdHR),以解释竞争死亡风险。结果在221例RA-LD病例(151例RA-ILD和70例RA-BR)和980例RA-no -LD比较组中,RA-LD的严重感染风险明显高于RA-no -LD比较组(55.8 vs 25.8 / 1000人年,sdHR 1.60, 95%CI 1.20-2.12)。RA-ILD病例的风险增加仍然显著(sdHR 1.79, 95%CI 1.33-2.41),但RA-BR病例的风险增加不显著(sdHR 1.19, 95%CI 0.72-1.97)。RA-LD最常见的感染解剖部位包括肺部、皮肤软组织和耳鼻喉;RA-LD与多种病原体类型相关:病毒、细菌、真菌和分枝杆菌。在RA-LD病例中,特别是RA-BR病例中出现频率较高的特定病原体包括流感病毒、呼吸道合胞病毒、葡萄球菌、假单胞菌和非结核分枝杆菌。结论ra - ld,尤其是RA-ILD,与不同解剖部位和不同病原体类型的严重感染风险显著增加相关。RA-BR与肺部感染增加有关。需要前瞻性研究和试验来明确治疗RA-LD患者和降低感染风险的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Arthritis & Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: Arthritis & Rheumatology is the official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and focuses on the natural history, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of rheumatic diseases. It is a peer-reviewed publication that aims to provide the highest quality basic and clinical research in this field. The journal covers a wide range of investigative areas and also includes review articles, editorials, and educational material for researchers and clinicians. Being recognized as a leading research journal in rheumatology, Arthritis & Rheumatology serves the global community of rheumatology investigators and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信