Continuous Glucose Monitors Have Acceptable Accuracy but High Discordance at High and Low Glucose Concentrations in Pediatric Hospitalized Patients.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Isaiah K Mensah,Vahid Azimi,Christopher W Farnsworth
{"title":"Continuous Glucose Monitors Have Acceptable Accuracy but High Discordance at High and Low Glucose Concentrations in Pediatric Hospitalized Patients.","authors":"Isaiah K Mensah,Vahid Azimi,Christopher W Farnsworth","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nContinuous glucose monitors (CGMs) assess interstitial glucose concentrations and improve diabetes management in outpatient settings. However, limited studies have assessed CGM performance in hospitalized pediatric patients, especially at high and low glucose thresholds near clinical decision limits.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis retrospective study included 72 hospitalized pediatric patients with dysglycemia who used CGMs during hospitalization. Paired CGM results within 10 min of laboratory (Lab) and point-of-care (POC) glucose results were retrieved. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) and percentage of glucose values in acceptable Parkes error zones were assessed. Concordance of CGM and POC results and the frequency that CGM results <70 mg/dL and >180 mg/dL were confirmed (-15 min to +30 min) using POC was assessed.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThere were 2228 paired CGM and Lab or POC glucose results with a MARD of 14.8%, and 99.2% of results were in Parkes zones A and B. The MARD was 20.2% and 13.6% in the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges. The MARD for POC glucose meters was 15.6% and 8.2% for the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges. The Cohen kappa between CGM and POC was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.63-0.69). CGM results in the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges were repeated 80.2% and 16.5% of the time, respectively, with POC methods.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe MARD of CGM in hospitalized pediatric patients is clinically acceptable but there is high discordance between CGM and POC. This implies a clinical need to confirm high and low glucose concentrations with Lab or POC methods but confirmatory testing is commonly not performed.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) assess interstitial glucose concentrations and improve diabetes management in outpatient settings. However, limited studies have assessed CGM performance in hospitalized pediatric patients, especially at high and low glucose thresholds near clinical decision limits. METHODS This retrospective study included 72 hospitalized pediatric patients with dysglycemia who used CGMs during hospitalization. Paired CGM results within 10 min of laboratory (Lab) and point-of-care (POC) glucose results were retrieved. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) and percentage of glucose values in acceptable Parkes error zones were assessed. Concordance of CGM and POC results and the frequency that CGM results <70 mg/dL and >180 mg/dL were confirmed (-15 min to +30 min) using POC was assessed. RESULTS There were 2228 paired CGM and Lab or POC glucose results with a MARD of 14.8%, and 99.2% of results were in Parkes zones A and B. The MARD was 20.2% and 13.6% in the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges. The MARD for POC glucose meters was 15.6% and 8.2% for the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges. The Cohen kappa between CGM and POC was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.63-0.69). CGM results in the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges were repeated 80.2% and 16.5% of the time, respectively, with POC methods. CONCLUSION The MARD of CGM in hospitalized pediatric patients is clinically acceptable but there is high discordance between CGM and POC. This implies a clinical need to confirm high and low glucose concentrations with Lab or POC methods but confirmatory testing is commonly not performed.
在儿科住院患者中,连续血糖监测仪具有可接受的准确性,但在高血糖和低血糖浓度时存在高不一致性。
背景:连续血糖监测仪(cgm)评估间质葡萄糖浓度,改善门诊糖尿病管理。然而,有限的研究评估了住院儿科患者的CGM性能,特别是在接近临床决策限制的高血糖和低血糖阈值时。方法回顾性研究72例住院期间使用cgm的儿科血糖异常患者。检索实验室(Lab)和护理点(POC)血糖结果后10分钟内的配对CGM结果。平均绝对相对差(MARD)和葡萄糖值在可接受的帕克斯误差区百分比进行评估。评估了CGM和POC结果的一致性,以及POC确认CGM结果为180 mg/dL (-15 min至+30 min)的频率。结果共2228例CGM、Lab或POC血糖结果,MARD为14.8%,其中99.2%出现在Parkes区a区和b区,其中低血糖区和高血糖区MARD分别为20.2%和13.6%。POC血糖仪在低血糖和高血糖范围的MARD分别为15.6%和8.2%。CGM和POC之间的Cohen kappa为0.66 (95% CI, 0.63-0.69)。用POC方法测得低血糖和高血糖的CGM结果分别重复80.2%和16.5%。结论儿科住院患者CGM的MARD临床可接受,但CGM与POC存在较高的不一致性。这意味着临床需要用实验室或POC方法确认血糖浓度高低,但通常不进行确证性测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信