Navigating the Uncertainties of Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: A Comprehensive Review.

Eirini Beneki, Kyriakos Dimitriadis, Nikolaos Pyrpyris, Georgios Tzimas, Ioannis Skalidis, David Meier, Panagiotis Antiochos, Panagiotis Kostakis, Efthymia Pavlou, Francesco Perone, Georgios Tsivgoulis, Constantina Aggeli, Ole de Backer, Konstantinos Tsioufis
{"title":"Navigating the Uncertainties of Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: A Comprehensive Review.","authors":"Eirini Beneki, Kyriakos Dimitriadis, Nikolaos Pyrpyris, Georgios Tzimas, Ioannis Skalidis, David Meier, Panagiotis Antiochos, Panagiotis Kostakis, Efthymia Pavlou, Francesco Perone, Georgios Tsivgoulis, Constantina Aggeli, Ole de Backer, Konstantinos Tsioufis","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The patent foramen ovale (PFO), present in 25% of the population, can cause paradoxical embolism and stroke. Transcatheter PFO closure is the gold standard for recurrent embolism with significant inter-atrial shunting, with recent trials confirming its superiority in reducing ischemic stroke recurrence over medical therapy. However, device-related thrombosis remains a concern, posing risks of systemic embolism and neurological events. Optimal post-closure antithrombotic management, including the choice and duration of therapy, remains unclear. Recommendations suggest transient dual antiplatelet therapy followed by long-term single therapy, but robust evidence is lacking, especially regarding device neo-endothelization timelines. Current studies often lack long-term follow-up, leaving gaps in understanding the incidence and prevention of thrombosis. Future research is crucial to provide evidence-based guidance and refine personalized treatment strategies for better outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The patent foramen ovale (PFO), present in 25% of the population, can cause paradoxical embolism and stroke. Transcatheter PFO closure is the gold standard for recurrent embolism with significant inter-atrial shunting, with recent trials confirming its superiority in reducing ischemic stroke recurrence over medical therapy. However, device-related thrombosis remains a concern, posing risks of systemic embolism and neurological events. Optimal post-closure antithrombotic management, including the choice and duration of therapy, remains unclear. Recommendations suggest transient dual antiplatelet therapy followed by long-term single therapy, but robust evidence is lacking, especially regarding device neo-endothelization timelines. Current studies often lack long-term follow-up, leaving gaps in understanding the incidence and prevention of thrombosis. Future research is crucial to provide evidence-based guidance and refine personalized treatment strategies for better outcomes.

经导管卵圆孔未闭后抗血栓治疗的不确定性:全面回顾。
卵圆孔未闭(PFO)存在于25%的人群中,可引起矛盾栓塞和中风。经导管PFO关闭术是治疗复发性栓塞伴房间分流的金标准,最近的试验证实其在减少缺血性卒中复发方面优于药物治疗。然而,与器械相关的血栓形成仍然是一个问题,它带来了全身性栓塞和神经事件的风险。最佳的关闭后抗血栓管理,包括治疗的选择和持续时间,仍然不清楚。建议短暂的双重抗血小板治疗,然后是长期的单一治疗,但缺乏强有力的证据,特别是关于设备新内皮化的时间表。目前的研究往往缺乏长期随访,在了解血栓形成的发生率和预防方面存在空白。未来的研究对于提供基于证据的指导和完善个性化治疗策略以获得更好的结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信