Dismantling colonial legacies: Decolonising research and teaching at the Health in Humanitarian Crises Centre, London school of hygiene and tropical medicine.

IF 2.5
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-07-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004833
Sali Hafez, Amber Clarke, Katharina Richter, Michelle Lokot, Althea-Maria Rivas, Neha S Singh
{"title":"Dismantling colonial legacies: Decolonising research and teaching at the Health in Humanitarian Crises Centre, London school of hygiene and tropical medicine.","authors":"Sali Hafez, Amber Clarke, Katharina Richter, Michelle Lokot, Althea-Maria Rivas, Neha S Singh","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite a burgeoning discourse within the humanitarian health community regarding decolonisation, there remains lack of practical guidance for researchers seeking to decolonise their work. We conducted a qualitative study which aimed to explore the perceptions of research and teaching staff at the Health in Humanitarian Crisis Centre (HHCC) and their external partners -including humanitarian health researchers, practitioners, and donors- regarding how to decolonise research, teaching and partnerships at a leading global health Higher Education institution in the UK. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews and 3 focus group discussions with HHCC members and external partners, including donors, academic institutions in conflict-affected and humanitarian settings, and practitioners from local and international humanitarian organisations. The first theme explored the concept of decolonisation itself, examining the disparate definitions and understandings held by HHCC members and partners, along with examining the institutional appetite and the role of leadership in driving decolonisation efforts. The second theme focused on sectoral and structural barriers to decolonising HHCC's work, including the dominance of Western-defined knowledge models, inequitable funding policies and practices, and epistemic injustice. Finally, the third theme explored HHCC's experiences in decolonising teaching and curriculum. The study identifies good practices within the HHCC community including knowledge co-production, equitable authorship arrangements, co-dissemination of findings, assigning co-principal investigators from conflict-affected countries, and centring and building on the experiences of researchers with relevant lived experience. However, these individual efforts contrast with a lack of appetite at the institutional level to address the underlying structural barriers. Our study provides the foundations for humanitarian health researchers and educators based in the Global North to begin to practically decolonise their work in the sphere of global/humanitarian health.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 7","pages":"e0004833"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite a burgeoning discourse within the humanitarian health community regarding decolonisation, there remains lack of practical guidance for researchers seeking to decolonise their work. We conducted a qualitative study which aimed to explore the perceptions of research and teaching staff at the Health in Humanitarian Crisis Centre (HHCC) and their external partners -including humanitarian health researchers, practitioners, and donors- regarding how to decolonise research, teaching and partnerships at a leading global health Higher Education institution in the UK. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews and 3 focus group discussions with HHCC members and external partners, including donors, academic institutions in conflict-affected and humanitarian settings, and practitioners from local and international humanitarian organisations. The first theme explored the concept of decolonisation itself, examining the disparate definitions and understandings held by HHCC members and partners, along with examining the institutional appetite and the role of leadership in driving decolonisation efforts. The second theme focused on sectoral and structural barriers to decolonising HHCC's work, including the dominance of Western-defined knowledge models, inequitable funding policies and practices, and epistemic injustice. Finally, the third theme explored HHCC's experiences in decolonising teaching and curriculum. The study identifies good practices within the HHCC community including knowledge co-production, equitable authorship arrangements, co-dissemination of findings, assigning co-principal investigators from conflict-affected countries, and centring and building on the experiences of researchers with relevant lived experience. However, these individual efforts contrast with a lack of appetite at the institutional level to address the underlying structural barriers. Our study provides the foundations for humanitarian health researchers and educators based in the Global North to begin to practically decolonise their work in the sphere of global/humanitarian health.

拆除殖民遗产:伦敦卫生和热带医学学院人道主义危机卫生中心非殖民化研究和教学。
尽管在人道主义卫生界关于非殖民化的讨论迅速发展,但对于寻求使其工作非殖民化的研究人员来说,仍然缺乏实际指导。我们进行了一项定性研究,旨在探讨人道主义危机健康中心(HHCC)及其外部合作伙伴(包括人道主义健康研究人员、从业者和捐助者)的研究和教学人员对如何在英国领先的全球健康高等教育机构进行非殖民化研究、教学和伙伴关系的看法。我们与HHCC成员和外部合作伙伴进行了20次半结构化访谈和3次焦点小组讨论,包括捐助者、受冲突影响的学术机构和人道主义机构,以及本地和国际人道主义组织的从业人员。第一个主题探讨了非殖民化本身的概念,审查了HHCC成员和合作伙伴所持有的不同定义和理解,以及审查了机构意愿和领导在推动非殖民化努力中的作用。第二个主题侧重于HHCC非殖民化工作的部门和结构性障碍,包括西方定义的知识模型的主导地位,不公平的资助政策和实践,以及认识上的不公正。最后,第三个主题探讨了HHCC在非殖民化教学和课程方面的经验。该研究确定了HHCC社区内的良好做法,包括知识合作生产、公平的作者安排、共同传播研究结果、指派来自受冲突影响国家的共同主要研究者,以及集中和利用具有相关生活经验的研究人员的经验。然而,这些个人努力与体制一级缺乏解决潜在结构性障碍的意愿形成对比。我们的研究为全球北方的人道主义卫生研究人员和教育工作者开始在全球/人道主义卫生领域实际开展非殖民化工作提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信