Macrovascular Hemodynamics and Peripheral Perfusion in Cardiogenic Shock

Leah B. Kosyakovsky MD, MSc , William B. Earle MD , Colter Wichern MD , Carla Boyle BS , Conrad Macon MD , Rebecca Mathew MD , Benjamin Hibbert MD, PhD , Joaquin E. Cigarroa MD , Jeffrey A. Marbach MBBS, MS
{"title":"Macrovascular Hemodynamics and Peripheral Perfusion in Cardiogenic Shock","authors":"Leah B. Kosyakovsky MD, MSc ,&nbsp;William B. Earle MD ,&nbsp;Colter Wichern MD ,&nbsp;Carla Boyle BS ,&nbsp;Conrad Macon MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca Mathew MD ,&nbsp;Benjamin Hibbert MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Joaquin E. Cigarroa MD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Marbach MBBS, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite significant advances in care over the past few decades, mortality among patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains up to 50%. Given the persistently high mortality, there is an urgent need for both better prognostic tools and treatment strategies. The pathophysiology of CS has major contributions from both macrovascular and microvascular dysfunction, but therapies are titrated toward the more readily measurable metrics (ie, mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, etc) under the assumption that both macrovascular and microvascular dynamics will respond to intervention in tandem. However, emerging evidence suggests that macrovascular and microvascular circulatory functions are not always aligned, particularly in those with critical illness. This review summarizes the significance of different macrovascular and microvascular metrics in CS, drawing from a robust field of evidence to demonstrate the promising role that microvascular tissue perfusion markers play in management of patients with CS and summarize the current understanding of this burgeoning field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73527,"journal":{"name":"JACC advances","volume":"4 10","pages":"Article 101964"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25003862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite significant advances in care over the past few decades, mortality among patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains up to 50%. Given the persistently high mortality, there is an urgent need for both better prognostic tools and treatment strategies. The pathophysiology of CS has major contributions from both macrovascular and microvascular dysfunction, but therapies are titrated toward the more readily measurable metrics (ie, mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, etc) under the assumption that both macrovascular and microvascular dynamics will respond to intervention in tandem. However, emerging evidence suggests that macrovascular and microvascular circulatory functions are not always aligned, particularly in those with critical illness. This review summarizes the significance of different macrovascular and microvascular metrics in CS, drawing from a robust field of evidence to demonstrate the promising role that microvascular tissue perfusion markers play in management of patients with CS and summarize the current understanding of this burgeoning field.
心源性休克的大血管血流动力学和外周灌注:探索当前目标和未来方向。
尽管在过去的几十年里,护理取得了重大进展,但心源性休克(CS)患者的死亡率仍然高达50%。鉴于持续的高死亡率,迫切需要更好的预后工具和治疗策略。CS的病理生理学主要来自大血管和微血管功能障碍,但在假设大血管和微血管动力学都会对干预产生反应的情况下,治疗方法倾向于更容易测量的指标(即平均动脉压、心脏指数等)。然而,新出现的证据表明,大血管和微血管循环功能并不总是一致的,特别是在那些危重疾病患者中。本文总结了不同的大血管和微血管指标在CS中的意义,从大量的证据中展示了微血管组织灌注标志物在CS患者管理中的重要作用,并总结了目前对这一新兴领域的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC advances
JACC advances Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信