Bridging the knowledge gap: a feminist lens on the post-birth control syndrome and media narratives.

IF 2.4 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2025-07-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2025.1556810
Jana Niemann, Amand Führer
{"title":"Bridging the knowledge gap: a feminist lens on the post-birth control syndrome and media narratives.","authors":"Jana Niemann, Amand Führer","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2025.1556810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research regarding the period after the discontinuation of oral contraceptives remains largely confined to the return of fertility and menstruation, reflecting a narrow and medicalizing approach to sexual and reproductive health. Still, beyond this biomedical discourse, there is a growing debate concerning the experiences of those who discontinue oral contraception. This debate gravitates around the term \"post-birth control syndrome\" and mostly takes place in various online communities.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>In this perspective, we aim to explore this discourse on German and English language (social) media and highlight how the absence of reliable studies creates a void that is actively filled by commercial agendas, unchecked online information, and personal accounts.</p><p><strong>Argument: </strong>Instead of merely turning to the internet because of insufficient research, it is the commercial exploitation of this gap that intensifies certain narratives, risking spreading misinformation and disempowering former pill users by depriving them of scientific perspectives on their health. We emphasize the necessity of addressing this gap through feminist research that prioritizes biopsychosocial well-being, including its structural dimensions, rather than focusing solely on reproductive outcomes. Bridging this knowledge gap requires classical clinical and socioepidemiological research into post-pill physiological mechanisms and contexts, complemented by qualitative studies capturing user experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By shifting contraceptive health research towards comprehensive, user-centered perspectives, feminist science can empower individuals to make informed decisions and promote contraceptive autonomy within medical and public health frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1556810"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1556810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research regarding the period after the discontinuation of oral contraceptives remains largely confined to the return of fertility and menstruation, reflecting a narrow and medicalizing approach to sexual and reproductive health. Still, beyond this biomedical discourse, there is a growing debate concerning the experiences of those who discontinue oral contraception. This debate gravitates around the term "post-birth control syndrome" and mostly takes place in various online communities.

Aim: In this perspective, we aim to explore this discourse on German and English language (social) media and highlight how the absence of reliable studies creates a void that is actively filled by commercial agendas, unchecked online information, and personal accounts.

Argument: Instead of merely turning to the internet because of insufficient research, it is the commercial exploitation of this gap that intensifies certain narratives, risking spreading misinformation and disempowering former pill users by depriving them of scientific perspectives on their health. We emphasize the necessity of addressing this gap through feminist research that prioritizes biopsychosocial well-being, including its structural dimensions, rather than focusing solely on reproductive outcomes. Bridging this knowledge gap requires classical clinical and socioepidemiological research into post-pill physiological mechanisms and contexts, complemented by qualitative studies capturing user experiences.

Conclusion: By shifting contraceptive health research towards comprehensive, user-centered perspectives, feminist science can empower individuals to make informed decisions and promote contraceptive autonomy within medical and public health frameworks.

弥合知识鸿沟:从女性主义视角看节育后综合症和媒体叙事。
背景:关于停止口服避孕药后时期的研究仍然主要局限于生育能力和月经的恢复,反映了对性健康和生殖健康的狭隘和医疗化的做法。尽管如此,在这种生物医学的论述之外,关于那些停止口服避孕药的人的经历也有越来越多的争论。这场争论主要围绕着“节育后综合症”这一术语展开,主要发生在各种网络社区。目的:从这个角度来看,我们的目标是探索德语和英语(社交)媒体上的这种话语,并强调缺乏可靠的研究是如何创造一个由商业议程、未经检查的在线信息和个人账户积极填补的空白的。论点:不是仅仅因为研究不足而求助于互联网,而是对这一差距的商业利用加剧了某些叙述,有可能传播错误信息,剥夺前避孕药使用者对自己健康的科学观点,从而削弱他们的能力。我们强调有必要通过女权主义研究解决这一差距,优先考虑生物心理社会福祉,包括其结构维度,而不是仅仅关注生殖结果。弥合这一知识差距需要对服药后的生理机制和背景进行经典的临床和社会流行病学研究,并辅以捕捉用户体验的定性研究。结论:通过将避孕健康研究转向全面的、以用户为中心的观点,女权主义科学可以赋予个人权力,使其能够做出明智的决定,并在医疗和公共卫生框架内促进避孕自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信