The inclusion of a Holter Reading software in the clinical practice of cardiology shows a multi-level high positive impact in healthcare: a real-world implementation study in three Spanish hospitals.

IF 4.4 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2025-05-24 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf058
Juan Antonio Álvaro de la Parra, Francisco de Asis Diaz-Cortegana, David Gonzalez-Casal, Petra Sanz-Mayordomo, Jose-Angel Cabrera, Jose Manuel Rubio Campal, Bernadette Pfang, Ion Cristóbal, Cristina Caramés, María Elvira Barrios Garrido-Lestache
{"title":"The inclusion of a Holter Reading software in the clinical practice of cardiology shows a multi-level high positive impact in healthcare: a real-world implementation study in three Spanish hospitals.","authors":"Juan Antonio Álvaro de la Parra, Francisco de Asis Diaz-Cortegana, David Gonzalez-Casal, Petra Sanz-Mayordomo, Jose-Angel Cabrera, Jose Manuel Rubio Campal, Bernadette Pfang, Ion Cristóbal, Cristina Caramés, María Elvira Barrios Garrido-Lestache","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Holter monitoring is a high prevalent technique to detect various heart pathologies. Its use has progressively increased over time with the consequent expenditure of time to interpret its results. We aim to evaluate the validity of the Cardiologs software as well as the clinical utility and potential benefits derived from the inclusion of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software in the clinical routine of the cardiology service.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Concordance analyses were performed to determine the degree of correlation between the results reported by the Cardiologs software and cardiologists regarding a list of variables for 498 Holter records included in the study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative prediction values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and odds ratio were calculated. The preliminary analysis reported good correlation between the reported observations by the cardiologists involved in this study (Kappa = 0.67; <i>P</i> < 0001). Furthermore, an excellent concordance was found between software and cardiologists in the detection of atrial fibrillation, ventricular extrasystoles and sinus pauses of >3 s, moderate for supraventricular extrasystoles (Kappa > 0.80 in all cases), but weak or poor correlations in the rest of the variables studied. The global correlation was moderate (Kappa = 0.43; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Notably, the software showed sensitivity of 99.4%, negative predictive value of 99.5%, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.010, highlighting its clinical usefulness in correctly identify normal tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The inclusion of an AI-based software for reading Holter tests may have great impact in distinguishing normal Holter tests, leading to time savings and improved clinical efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 4","pages":"742-748"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12282345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Holter monitoring is a high prevalent technique to detect various heart pathologies. Its use has progressively increased over time with the consequent expenditure of time to interpret its results. We aim to evaluate the validity of the Cardiologs software as well as the clinical utility and potential benefits derived from the inclusion of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software in the clinical routine of the cardiology service.

Methods and results: Concordance analyses were performed to determine the degree of correlation between the results reported by the Cardiologs software and cardiologists regarding a list of variables for 498 Holter records included in the study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative prediction values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and odds ratio were calculated. The preliminary analysis reported good correlation between the reported observations by the cardiologists involved in this study (Kappa = 0.67; P < 0001). Furthermore, an excellent concordance was found between software and cardiologists in the detection of atrial fibrillation, ventricular extrasystoles and sinus pauses of >3 s, moderate for supraventricular extrasystoles (Kappa > 0.80 in all cases), but weak or poor correlations in the rest of the variables studied. The global correlation was moderate (Kappa = 0.43; P < 0.001). Notably, the software showed sensitivity of 99.4%, negative predictive value of 99.5%, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.010, highlighting its clinical usefulness in correctly identify normal tests.

Conclusion: The inclusion of an AI-based software for reading Holter tests may have great impact in distinguishing normal Holter tests, leading to time savings and improved clinical efficiency.

Abstract Image

在心脏病学的临床实践中纳入霍尔特阅读软件显示了对医疗保健的多层次高积极影响:在三家西班牙医院的现实世界实施研究。
目的:动态心电图监测是一种非常普遍的检测各种心脏疾病的技术。随着时间的推移,它的使用逐渐增加,随之而来的是解释其结果的时间。我们的目标是评估心脏病学软件的有效性,以及在心脏病学服务的临床常规中包含基于人工智能(AI)的软件所带来的临床效用和潜在益处。方法和结果:进行一致性分析,以确定Cardiologs软件和心脏病专家报告的结果与研究中498份霍尔特记录的变量列表之间的相关性程度。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值、阳性似然比和阴性似然比、优势比。初步分析报告了参与这项研究的心脏病专家报告的观察结果之间的良好相关性(Kappa = 0.67;P < 0001)。此外,软件和心脏病专家在房颤、室性心动过速和窦性停搏的检测上有很好的一致性,在室上性心动过速中有中度一致性(Kappa > 0.80),但在研究的其他变量中相关性较弱或较差。整体相关性为中等(Kappa = 0.43;P < 0.001)。值得注意的是,该软件的灵敏度为99.4%,阴性预测值为99.5%,阴性似然比为0.010,突出了其在正确识别正常检查方面的临床应用价值。结论:纳入基于人工智能的霍尔特测试读数软件,对区分正常霍尔特测试有很大的影响,节省了时间,提高了临床效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信