The contribution of surgical data science to identifying intraoperative human errors and adverse events in elective liver surgery: A preliminary study.

IF 1.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Nesrine Mekhenane, Clement Cormi, Arnaud Allemang-Trivalle, Belkacem Acidi, Daniel Cherqui, Eric Vibert, Marc-Antoine Allard
{"title":"The contribution of surgical data science to identifying intraoperative human errors and adverse events in elective liver surgery: A preliminary study.","authors":"Nesrine Mekhenane, Clement Cormi, Arnaud Allemang-Trivalle, Belkacem Acidi, Daniel Cherqui, Eric Vibert, Marc-Antoine Allard","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.25-089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Surgical data science (SDS) is an emerging discipline that aims to enhance the quality of interventional healthcare by capturing and analyzing intraoperative data. Our study focused on identifying human errors (HEs) and adverse events (AEs) during elective liver surgery using an SDS-based approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intraoperative data from 15 patients undergoing elective open liver resection were collected using an operating room data system (audio, room, and operative field videos) over a 6-month period in a tertiary hepatobiliary surgical center. Two independent researchers analyzed the data to identify HEs and AEs according to two distinct classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 154 HEs (median number per intervention: 7) and 42 AEs (33 minor, 9 major) were identified. All except one major AE were associated with HEs, while 15 minor AEs had no identifiable underlying HEs. The type of HEs significantly varied depending on the presence or absence of AEs. The majority of HEs (n = 128, 83.1%), which did not result in any AEs, primarily involved lapses in attention, whereas approximately half of the AEs were linked to failures in recognition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This preliminary study indicates that failures in recognition were frequently associated with major AEs during elective liver resection, as per the SDS approach. Larger multicenter studies are necessary to confirm these findings and develop preventive strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.25-089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: Surgical data science (SDS) is an emerging discipline that aims to enhance the quality of interventional healthcare by capturing and analyzing intraoperative data. Our study focused on identifying human errors (HEs) and adverse events (AEs) during elective liver surgery using an SDS-based approach.

Methods: Intraoperative data from 15 patients undergoing elective open liver resection were collected using an operating room data system (audio, room, and operative field videos) over a 6-month period in a tertiary hepatobiliary surgical center. Two independent researchers analyzed the data to identify HEs and AEs according to two distinct classifications.

Results: A total of 154 HEs (median number per intervention: 7) and 42 AEs (33 minor, 9 major) were identified. All except one major AE were associated with HEs, while 15 minor AEs had no identifiable underlying HEs. The type of HEs significantly varied depending on the presence or absence of AEs. The majority of HEs (n = 128, 83.1%), which did not result in any AEs, primarily involved lapses in attention, whereas approximately half of the AEs were linked to failures in recognition.

Conclusions: This preliminary study indicates that failures in recognition were frequently associated with major AEs during elective liver resection, as per the SDS approach. Larger multicenter studies are necessary to confirm these findings and develop preventive strategies.

外科数据科学对选择性肝脏手术中识别术中人为错误和不良事件的贡献:初步研究。
背景/目的:外科数据科学(SDS)是一门新兴学科,旨在通过捕获和分析术中数据来提高介入医疗的质量。我们的研究重点是使用基于sds的方法识别选择性肝脏手术中的人为错误(HEs)和不良事件(ae)。方法:对某三级肝胆外科中心15例择期开放性肝切除术患者的术中资料进行收集,收集时间为6个月,使用手术室数据系统(音频、房间和手术现场视频)。两名独立的研究人员分析了数据,根据两种不同的分类来识别he和ae。结果:共鉴定出154例he(每次干预中位数:7)和42例ae(轻度33例,重度9例)。除1例严重AE外,其余AE均与he相关,15例轻微AE无可识别的潜在he。he的类型根据ae的存在与否而显著变化。大多数he (n = 128, 83.1%)没有导致任何ae,主要涉及注意力缺失,而大约一半的ae与识别失败有关。结论:这项初步研究表明,在选择性肝切除术中,识别失败经常与主要ae相关,根据SDS方法。需要更大规模的多中心研究来证实这些发现并制定预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信