Prospective comparison of static versus dynamic images in abdominal ultrasound education - a randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Johannes Matthias Weimer, Michael Eigenseher, Simon Alexander Stiehl, Dieter Nürnberg, Michael Ludwig, Marie Stäuber, Andreas Weimer, Roman Kloeckner, Klaus Dirks, Liv Lorenz, Holger Buggenhangen, Julia-Weinmann-Menke, Daniel Merkel
{"title":"Prospective comparison of static versus dynamic images in abdominal ultrasound education - a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Johannes Matthias Weimer, Michael Eigenseher, Simon Alexander Stiehl, Dieter Nürnberg, Michael Ludwig, Marie Stäuber, Andreas Weimer, Roman Kloeckner, Klaus Dirks, Liv Lorenz, Holger Buggenhangen, Julia-Weinmann-Menke, Daniel Merkel","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07711-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In medical ultrasound education, static and dynamic images help learners to understand sonoanatomical and sonopathological findings. However, there is currently no clear evidence or recommendations from professional associations regarding which presentation format is more effective for developing ultrasound competencies. This prospective, randomised, controlled study aimed to investigate the impact of static versus dynamic ultrasound images on learners' acquisition of theoretical competencies in abdominal sonography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in certified ultrasound courses were randomised into two groups following an introductory session on ultrasound basics. Separately, both groups completed training covering normal findings and pathologies of the gallbladder, the liver and the pancreas. The study group underwent a digital training session (18 min total) for each of the three topics using dynamic images (video clips) while the control group received the same training session using static images. After the training, participants of both groups completed an online multiple-choice theory test, consisting of 54 questions with 4 answer options per question.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 145 datasets (69 control group, 76 study group) were included in the analysis. The study group achieved significantly higher overall theory test scores (p = 0.001) and performed significantly better in the total score of pathology findings (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the total score of normal findings (p = 0.08). Multivariate regression analysis identified \"group allocation dynamic,\" \"experience with > 30 ultrasound examinations,\" and \"employment in internal medicine\" as significant positive predictors (p < 0.01) of theory test performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dynamic images in ultrasound education improve comprehension of pathological findings over static images. These insights should inform the development and adaptation of future training programs and educational materials to enhance the quality of ultrasound education and diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"1102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07711-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In medical ultrasound education, static and dynamic images help learners to understand sonoanatomical and sonopathological findings. However, there is currently no clear evidence or recommendations from professional associations regarding which presentation format is more effective for developing ultrasound competencies. This prospective, randomised, controlled study aimed to investigate the impact of static versus dynamic ultrasound images on learners' acquisition of theoretical competencies in abdominal sonography.

Methods: Participants in certified ultrasound courses were randomised into two groups following an introductory session on ultrasound basics. Separately, both groups completed training covering normal findings and pathologies of the gallbladder, the liver and the pancreas. The study group underwent a digital training session (18 min total) for each of the three topics using dynamic images (video clips) while the control group received the same training session using static images. After the training, participants of both groups completed an online multiple-choice theory test, consisting of 54 questions with 4 answer options per question.

Results: A total of 145 datasets (69 control group, 76 study group) were included in the analysis. The study group achieved significantly higher overall theory test scores (p = 0.001) and performed significantly better in the total score of pathology findings (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the total score of normal findings (p = 0.08). Multivariate regression analysis identified "group allocation dynamic," "experience with > 30 ultrasound examinations," and "employment in internal medicine" as significant positive predictors (p < 0.01) of theory test performance.

Conclusion: Dynamic images in ultrasound education improve comprehension of pathological findings over static images. These insights should inform the development and adaptation of future training programs and educational materials to enhance the quality of ultrasound education and diagnostic accuracy.

腹部超声教育中静态与动态图像的前瞻性比较——一项随机对照试验。
简介:在医学超声教育中,静态和动态图像帮助学习者理解超声解剖和超声病理结果。然而,目前还没有明确的证据或来自专业协会的建议,关于哪种演示形式对培养超声能力更有效。这项前瞻性、随机、对照研究旨在探讨静态和动态超声图像对学习者腹部超声理论能力习得的影响。方法:经过认证的超声课程的参与者在超声基础介绍课程后随机分为两组。另外,两组都完成了包括胆囊、肝脏和胰腺的正常发现和病理的训练。研究组使用动态图像(视频剪辑)对三个主题进行了一次数字训练(总共18分钟),而对照组使用静态图像接受了相同的训练。培训结束后,两组参与者都完成了一项在线选择理论测试,包括54个问题,每个问题有4个答案选项。结果:共纳入145个数据集,其中对照组69个,研究组76个。研究组的理论测试总分显著高于对照组(p = 0.001),病理检查总分(p = 30)和内科就业成绩(p = 30)显著高于对照组(p = 0.001)。结论:超声教育中的动态图像比静态图像更能提高对病理发现的理解。这些见解应该为未来培训计划和教育材料的发展和适应提供信息,以提高超声教育的质量和诊断的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信