{"title":"Normative Values and Factors Affecting the Pediatric Functional Reach Test in Japanese Children Aged 3-6 Years: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Junichi Inatomi, Ieyasu Watanabe, Yuki Ikemoto, Hideaki Takebayashi","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2025.2535344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to establish normative values for the Functional Reach Test (FRT) in Japanese children aged 3-6 years and examines age-related differences in FRT scores. Additionally, we evaluated the relationship between FRT scores and several factors and a predictive equation was developed to improve the clinical application of FRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 163 developing Japanese children. Participants completed two trials, with the average serving as the FRT score. Normative values were established for each age group. One-way analysis of variance and multiple regression analysis were used to assess age-related differences and factors influencing FRT performance, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FRT values significantly increased with age: 9.4 cm (3 years), 10.8 cm (4 years), 11.3 cm (5 years), and 15.7 cm (6 years). Six-year-olds exhibited significantly higher scores than all younger age groups (<i>p</i> < .001). Multiple regression analysis identified age and height as significant predictors, and a predictive equation incorporating these variables was developed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides normative FRT data for Japanese children aged 3-6 years, emphasizing the role of age and height. The predictive equation enhances the clinical application of FRT as a balance screening tool for children.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2535344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to establish normative values for the Functional Reach Test (FRT) in Japanese children aged 3-6 years and examines age-related differences in FRT scores. Additionally, we evaluated the relationship between FRT scores and several factors and a predictive equation was developed to improve the clinical application of FRT.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 163 developing Japanese children. Participants completed two trials, with the average serving as the FRT score. Normative values were established for each age group. One-way analysis of variance and multiple regression analysis were used to assess age-related differences and factors influencing FRT performance, respectively.
Results: FRT values significantly increased with age: 9.4 cm (3 years), 10.8 cm (4 years), 11.3 cm (5 years), and 15.7 cm (6 years). Six-year-olds exhibited significantly higher scores than all younger age groups (p < .001). Multiple regression analysis identified age and height as significant predictors, and a predictive equation incorporating these variables was developed.
Conclusion: This study provides normative FRT data for Japanese children aged 3-6 years, emphasizing the role of age and height. The predictive equation enhances the clinical application of FRT as a balance screening tool for children.
期刊介绍:
5 issues per year
Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine