Management and administration and non-clinical services staff experiences of co-worker unprofessional behaviour and their reported speaking-up skills: a survey across seven Australian hospitals.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ryan Daniel McMullan, Tim Badgery-Parker, Ling Li, Rachel Urwin, Johanna Westbrook
{"title":"Management and administration and non-clinical services staff experiences of co-worker unprofessional behaviour and their reported speaking-up skills: a survey across seven Australian hospitals.","authors":"Ryan Daniel McMullan, Tim Badgery-Parker, Ling Li, Rachel Urwin, Johanna Westbrook","doi":"10.1108/JHOM-04-2024-0164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Unprofessional behaviour is highly prevalent among hospital staff and negatively impacts staff wellbeing and patient care. Little is known about the experiences of non-clinical staff. We aimed to examine the types and prevalence of unprofessional behaviour experienced by management/administration staff and non-clinical services staff and their self-reported speaking-up skills.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>A survey was distributed to staff across seven hospitals. Staff were surveyed about their experiences of 21 incivility/bullying behaviours and 5 extreme unprofessional behaviours and about their speaking-up skills. Management/administration staff and non-clinical services staff responses were included in our analysis. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the associations between unprofessional behaviour, respondent characteristics and speaking-up.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The response rate for management/administration staff was 48.2% (N = 804) and 19.0% for non-clinical services staff (N = 525). Approximately 89% (N = 712; 95% CI, 86.6-90.7%) of management/administration and 80% (N = 422; 95% CI, 77.1-83.6%) of non-clinical services' respondents experienced incivility/bullying at least once in the preceding 12 months. Management/administration respondents who reported having speaking-up skills experienced frequent incivility/bullying less often (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.91). This relationship was not found for non-clinical services' respondents (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.51-1.32). There were no differences in the experience of extreme unprofessional behaviour for respondents who reported having speaking-up skills versus those that did not.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>Our results provide new evidence about the experiences of previously neglected groups of hospital staff about unprofessional behaviour, their confidence in speaking-up about it, and possible barriers and enablers for this, to inform practice.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":47447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-04-2024-0164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Unprofessional behaviour is highly prevalent among hospital staff and negatively impacts staff wellbeing and patient care. Little is known about the experiences of non-clinical staff. We aimed to examine the types and prevalence of unprofessional behaviour experienced by management/administration staff and non-clinical services staff and their self-reported speaking-up skills.

Design/methodology/approach: A survey was distributed to staff across seven hospitals. Staff were surveyed about their experiences of 21 incivility/bullying behaviours and 5 extreme unprofessional behaviours and about their speaking-up skills. Management/administration staff and non-clinical services staff responses were included in our analysis. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the associations between unprofessional behaviour, respondent characteristics and speaking-up.

Findings: The response rate for management/administration staff was 48.2% (N = 804) and 19.0% for non-clinical services staff (N = 525). Approximately 89% (N = 712; 95% CI, 86.6-90.7%) of management/administration and 80% (N = 422; 95% CI, 77.1-83.6%) of non-clinical services' respondents experienced incivility/bullying at least once in the preceding 12 months. Management/administration respondents who reported having speaking-up skills experienced frequent incivility/bullying less often (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.91). This relationship was not found for non-clinical services' respondents (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.51-1.32). There were no differences in the experience of extreme unprofessional behaviour for respondents who reported having speaking-up skills versus those that did not.

Originality/value: Our results provide new evidence about the experiences of previously neglected groups of hospital staff about unprofessional behaviour, their confidence in speaking-up about it, and possible barriers and enablers for this, to inform practice.

Highlights:

管理、行政和非临床服务人员对同事不专业行为的经历及其报告的发言技巧:对澳大利亚七家医院的调查。
目的:不专业行为在医院工作人员中非常普遍,并对工作人员的福祉和患者护理产生负面影响。人们对非临床工作人员的经历知之甚少。我们的目的是研究管理/行政人员和非临床服务人员所经历的不专业行为的类型和流行程度,以及他们自我报告的发言技巧。设计/方法/方法:向七家医院的工作人员分发了一项调查。工作人员被调查了21种不礼貌/欺凌行为和5种极端不专业行为的经历,以及他们的说话技巧。管理/行政人员和非临床服务人员的回答被纳入我们的分析。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来检验不专业行为、被调查者特征和发言之间的关系。结果:管理/行政人员的有效率为48.2% (N = 804),非临床服务人员的有效率为19.0% (N = 525)。约89% (N = 712;95% CI, 86.6-90.7%), 80% (N = 422;95% CI(77.1-83.6%)的非临床服务受访者在过去12个月内至少经历过一次不文明行为/欺凌。管理/行政人员的受访者报告说,他们有说话技巧,经历频繁的不礼貌/欺凌的频率较低(优势比[OR], 0.63;95% ci, 0.44-0.91)。非临床服务的受访者没有发现这种关系(OR, 0.82;95% ci, 0.51-1.32)。在极端不专业行为的经历上,自称拥有演讲技巧的受访者与不具备演讲技巧的受访者并无差异。原创性/价值:我们的结果为以前被忽视的医院工作人员群体关于不专业行为的经历,他们对谈论它的信心,以及可能的障碍和促成因素提供了新的证据,以告知实践。亮点:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: ■International health and international organizations ■Organisational behaviour, governance, management and leadership ■The inter-relationship of health and public sector services ■Theories and practices of management and leadership in health and related organizations ■Emotion in health care organizations ■Management education and training ■Industrial relations and human resource theory and management. As the demands on the health care industry both polarize and intensify, effective management of financial and human resources, the restructuring of organizations and the handling of market forces are increasingly important areas for the industry to address.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信