Psychometric Properties of the European Evaluation of Vertigo Scale (EEV) for a Spanish-Speaking Population: A Validation Study.

IF 1.8 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
María Alharilla Montilla-Ibáñez, Rafael Lomas-Vega, María Del Carmen López-Ruiz, Ángeles Díaz-Fernández, Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-Vera, Ana Belén Peinado-Rubia, Esteban Obrero-Gaitán, Ana Sedeño-Vidal
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the European Evaluation of Vertigo Scale (EEV) for a Spanish-Speaking Population: A Validation Study.","authors":"María Alharilla Montilla-Ibáñez, Rafael Lomas-Vega, María Del Carmen López-Ruiz, Ángeles Díaz-Fernández, Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-Vera, Ana Belén Peinado-Rubia, Esteban Obrero-Gaitán, Ana Sedeño-Vidal","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The objective of this study was to validate the Spanish version of the European Evaluation of Vertigo (EEV) and analyse its test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC), concurrent validity, and discriminant validity. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional validation study was designed. Subjects were recruited from the Otolaryngology Service of the University Hospital of Jaen. Psychometric properties of the EEV were analysed, including the concurrent validity, the SEM, and the MDC. Discriminant validity was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. <b>Results</b>: The EEV test-retest reliability was nearly perfect (Kappa index = 0.97). The SEM and the MDC were set at 0.56 and 1.10, respectively. Regarding the discriminant validity, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.831 (95% CI; 0.743-0.899) for the BPPV prediction, the AUC = 0.731 (95% CI; 0.633-0.815) for the disability prediction from the ABC-16 score, and the AUC = 0.846 (95% CI; 0.760-0.911) for the disability prediction from the ABC-6 score. Furthermore, a cut-off point greater than 12 was a good predictor of disability and the fall risk measured with the ABC scale, whereas a value of 11 points was a good predictor for discriminating BPPV patients. <b>Conclusions</b>: The Spanish version of the EEV is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating the clinical symptoms of vestibular syndrome. This instrument demonstrated a nearly perfect test-retest reliability, a low measurement error, and good accuracy in discriminating between patients with vestibular disorders and those with BPPV.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15040084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The objective of this study was to validate the Spanish version of the European Evaluation of Vertigo (EEV) and analyse its test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC), concurrent validity, and discriminant validity. Methods: A cross-sectional validation study was designed. Subjects were recruited from the Otolaryngology Service of the University Hospital of Jaen. Psychometric properties of the EEV were analysed, including the concurrent validity, the SEM, and the MDC. Discriminant validity was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The EEV test-retest reliability was nearly perfect (Kappa index = 0.97). The SEM and the MDC were set at 0.56 and 1.10, respectively. Regarding the discriminant validity, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.831 (95% CI; 0.743-0.899) for the BPPV prediction, the AUC = 0.731 (95% CI; 0.633-0.815) for the disability prediction from the ABC-16 score, and the AUC = 0.846 (95% CI; 0.760-0.911) for the disability prediction from the ABC-6 score. Furthermore, a cut-off point greater than 12 was a good predictor of disability and the fall risk measured with the ABC scale, whereas a value of 11 points was a good predictor for discriminating BPPV patients. Conclusions: The Spanish version of the EEV is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating the clinical symptoms of vestibular syndrome. This instrument demonstrated a nearly perfect test-retest reliability, a low measurement error, and good accuracy in discriminating between patients with vestibular disorders and those with BPPV.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

西班牙语人群眩晕量表(EEV)欧洲评估的心理测量特性:一项验证研究。
背景/目的:本研究的目的是验证西班牙版欧洲眩晕量表(EEV),并分析其重测信度、测量标准误差(SEM)、最小可检测变化(MDC)、并发效度和判别效度。方法:设计横断面验证研究。研究对象从哈恩大学医院耳鼻喉科招募。分析了EEV的心理测量特性,包括并发效度、扫描电镜(SEM)和MDC。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线计算判别效度。结果:EEV重测信度接近完美(Kappa指数= 0.97)。SEM和MDC分别设置为0.56和1.10。判别效度方面,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.831 (95% CI;0.743-0.899), AUC = 0.731 (95% CI;(0.633-0.815), AUC = 0.846 (95% CI;0.760-0.911)为ABC-6评分残障预测值。此外,ABC量表测量的分界点大于12分是残疾和跌倒风险的良好预测指标,而分界点大于11分是区分BPPV患者的良好预测指标。结论:西班牙语版EEV是评估前庭综合征临床症状的有效、可靠的工具。该仪器在鉴别前庭功能障碍患者和BPPV患者方面具有近乎完美的重测信度、较低的测量误差和良好的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信