Audiovisual Perception of Sentence Stress in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

IF 1.8 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Hartmut Meister, Moritz Wächtler, Pascale Sandmann, Ruth Lang-Roth, Khaled H A Abdel-Latif
{"title":"Audiovisual Perception of Sentence Stress in Cochlear Implant Recipients.","authors":"Hartmut Meister, Moritz Wächtler, Pascale Sandmann, Ruth Lang-Roth, Khaled H A Abdel-Latif","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Sentence stress as part of linguistic prosody plays an important role for verbal communication. It emphasizes particularly important words in a phrase and is reflected by acoustic cues such as the voice fundamental frequency. However, visual cues, especially facial movements, are also important for sentence stress perception. Since cochlear implant (CI) recipients are limited in their use of acoustic prosody cues, the question arises as to what extent they are able to exploit visual features. <b>Methods:</b> Virtual characters were used to provide highly realistic but controllable stimuli for investigating sentence stress in groups of experienced CI recipients and typical-hearing (TH) peers. In addition to the proportion of correctly identified stressed words, task load was assessed via reaction times (RTs) and task-evoked pupil dilation (TEPD), and visual attention was estimated via eye tracking. Experiment 1 considered congruent combinations of auditory and visual cues, while Experiment 2 presented incongruent stimuli. <b>Results:</b> In Experiment 1, CI users and TH participants performed similarly in the congruent audiovisual condition, while the former were better at using visual cues. RTs were generally faster in the AV condition, whereas TEPD revealed a more detailed picture, with TH subjects showing greater pupil dilation in the visual condition. The incongruent stimuli in Experiment 2 showed that modality use varied individually among CI recipients, while TH participants relied primarily on auditory cues. <b>Conclusions:</b> Visual cues are generally useful for perceiving sentence stress. As a group, CI users are better at using facial cues than their TH peers. However, CI users show individual differences in the reliability of the various cues.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12285941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15040077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Sentence stress as part of linguistic prosody plays an important role for verbal communication. It emphasizes particularly important words in a phrase and is reflected by acoustic cues such as the voice fundamental frequency. However, visual cues, especially facial movements, are also important for sentence stress perception. Since cochlear implant (CI) recipients are limited in their use of acoustic prosody cues, the question arises as to what extent they are able to exploit visual features. Methods: Virtual characters were used to provide highly realistic but controllable stimuli for investigating sentence stress in groups of experienced CI recipients and typical-hearing (TH) peers. In addition to the proportion of correctly identified stressed words, task load was assessed via reaction times (RTs) and task-evoked pupil dilation (TEPD), and visual attention was estimated via eye tracking. Experiment 1 considered congruent combinations of auditory and visual cues, while Experiment 2 presented incongruent stimuli. Results: In Experiment 1, CI users and TH participants performed similarly in the congruent audiovisual condition, while the former were better at using visual cues. RTs were generally faster in the AV condition, whereas TEPD revealed a more detailed picture, with TH subjects showing greater pupil dilation in the visual condition. The incongruent stimuli in Experiment 2 showed that modality use varied individually among CI recipients, while TH participants relied primarily on auditory cues. Conclusions: Visual cues are generally useful for perceiving sentence stress. As a group, CI users are better at using facial cues than their TH peers. However, CI users show individual differences in the reliability of the various cues.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人工耳蜗受者对句子重音的视听感知。
背景/目的:句子重音作为语言韵律的一部分,在言语交际中起着重要的作用。它强调短语中特别重要的单词,并通过声音线索(如声音基频)反映出来。然而,视觉线索,尤其是面部动作,对句子压力感知也很重要。由于人工耳蜗(CI)受者在使用声学韵律线索方面受到限制,问题是他们在多大程度上能够利用视觉特征。方法:使用虚拟人物提供高度逼真但可控的刺激,对有经验的CI接受者和正常听力(TH)同伴进行句子压力调查。除了正确识别重音单词的比例外,任务负荷通过反应时间(RTs)和任务诱发瞳孔扩张(TEPD)来评估,视觉注意力通过眼动追踪来评估。实验1考虑听觉和视觉线索的一致组合,而实验2考虑不一致刺激。结果:在实验1中,CI使用者和TH参与者在一致视听条件下的表现相似,而前者更擅长使用视觉线索。在AV条件下,RTs通常更快,而TEPD显示了更详细的图像,TH受试者在视觉条件下表现出更大的瞳孔扩张。实验2的不一致刺激表明,CI接受者的情态使用存在个体差异,而TH参与者主要依赖听觉线索。结论:视觉线索对句子重音的感知普遍有效。作为一个群体,CI用户比TH用户更善于使用面部线索。然而,CI使用者在各种线索的可靠性上表现出个体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信