A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of the Phonetic and Phonological Development of Children with Cochlear Implants and Its Relationship with Early Literacy.

IF 1.8 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Marinella Majorano, Michela Santangelo, Irene Redondi, Chiara Barachetti, Letizia Guerzoni, Domenico Cuda
{"title":"A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of the Phonetic and Phonological Development of Children with Cochlear Implants and Its Relationship with Early Literacy.","authors":"Marinella Majorano, Michela Santangelo, Irene Redondi, Chiara Barachetti, Letizia Guerzoni, Domenico Cuda","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: During the transition to primary school, children with cochlear implants (CIs) may show language and early literacy fragilities. This study has three aims. First, it compares the phonetic and phonological skills of preschoolers with CIs and those with normal hearing (NH); second, it investigates the correlation between phonetic/phonological and emergent literacy skills in the two groups; third, it explores the relationship between phonetic/phonological skills and age at implantation in preschoolers with CIs. <b>Methods</b>: Sixteen children with CIs (<i>M</i>age = 61 months; <i>SD</i> = 6.50) and twenty children with NH (<i>M</i>age = 64 months; <i>SD</i> = 4.30) participated in the study. Phonetic and phonological skills (phonetic inventories and phonological processes) and early literacy skills (phonological awareness and print knowledge) were assessed. Group differences and relationships between the variables of interest were considered in the two groups. <b>Results</b>: A qualitative analysis of phonetic and phonological development showed differences between the two groups. There were also significant differences in early literacy skills (e.g., in syllable segmentation). Significant correlations emerged in both groups between phonetic/phonological skills and early literacy, although in different variables. Significant correlations were also found between age at implantation and the phonetic inventory in children with CIs. <b>Conclusions</b>: Preschoolers with CIs display more delays in the phonetic and phonological production skills and more emergent literacy fragilities than NH peers. However, print knowledge did not differ significantly between the groups. Early implantation supports the phonetic skills associated with subsequent literacy learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15040081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: During the transition to primary school, children with cochlear implants (CIs) may show language and early literacy fragilities. This study has three aims. First, it compares the phonetic and phonological skills of preschoolers with CIs and those with normal hearing (NH); second, it investigates the correlation between phonetic/phonological and emergent literacy skills in the two groups; third, it explores the relationship between phonetic/phonological skills and age at implantation in preschoolers with CIs. Methods: Sixteen children with CIs (Mage = 61 months; SD = 6.50) and twenty children with NH (Mage = 64 months; SD = 4.30) participated in the study. Phonetic and phonological skills (phonetic inventories and phonological processes) and early literacy skills (phonological awareness and print knowledge) were assessed. Group differences and relationships between the variables of interest were considered in the two groups. Results: A qualitative analysis of phonetic and phonological development showed differences between the two groups. There were also significant differences in early literacy skills (e.g., in syllable segmentation). Significant correlations emerged in both groups between phonetic/phonological skills and early literacy, although in different variables. Significant correlations were also found between age at implantation and the phonetic inventory in children with CIs. Conclusions: Preschoolers with CIs display more delays in the phonetic and phonological production skills and more emergent literacy fragilities than NH peers. However, print knowledge did not differ significantly between the groups. Early implantation supports the phonetic skills associated with subsequent literacy learning.

植入人工耳蜗儿童语音和语音发展的定量和定性分析及其与早期读写能力的关系。
背景/目的:在向小学过渡期间,植入人工耳蜗的儿童可能表现出语言和早期读写能力的脆弱性。这项研究有三个目的。首先,比较了CIs学龄前儿童与正常听力儿童的语音和语音技能;其次,研究了两组儿童的语音/语音技能与新兴读写技能之间的相关性;第三,探讨了学龄前CIs儿童语音/语音技能与植入年龄的关系。方法:16例CIs患儿(年龄61个月;SD = 6.50)和20例NH患儿(年龄= 64个月;SD = 4.30)参加了研究。语音和语音技能(语音清单和语音过程)和早期识字技能(语音意识和印刷知识)被评估。在两组中考虑了组间差异和感兴趣变量之间的关系。结果:语音和语音发展的定性分析显示了两组之间的差异。在早期读写技能(例如,音节分割)方面也存在显著差异。在两组中,语音/语音技能和早期读写能力之间出现了显著的相关性,尽管变量不同。CIs患儿的着床年龄与语音量表之间也存在显著相关。结论:独联体儿童在语音和语音生成技能方面比非独联体儿童表现出更大的延迟和更大的突发性读写脆弱性。然而,两组之间的印刷知识没有显著差异。早期植入支持与随后的识字学习相关的语音技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信