[Pharmaceutical interventions in the new medicine service].

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Farmaceuticos Comunitarios Pub Date : 2025-05-19 eCollection Date: 2025-07-15 DOI:10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2025).20
N Amador-Fernández, E L Graham, ShI Benrimoj, E Pérez-Hoyos, V J Baixauli, V Colomer-Molina, O García-Agudo, V García-Cárdenas, M A Gastelurrutia, J Giner-Martínez, R Palomo-Llinares, R Sánchez-Tormo, F Martínez-Martínez
{"title":"[Pharmaceutical interventions in the new medicine service].","authors":"N Amador-Fernández, E L Graham, ShI Benrimoj, E Pérez-Hoyos, V J Baixauli, V Colomer-Molina, O García-Agudo, V García-Cárdenas, M A Gastelurrutia, J Giner-Martínez, R Palomo-Llinares, R Sánchez-Tormo, F Martínez-Martínez","doi":"10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2025).20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community pharmacy has been promoted internationally for the management of minor ailments with positive results for patients and health care systems. This study evaluates the clinical impact and implementation of a minor ailment service in community pharmacies' daily practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pragmatic study with a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design was conducted throughout Spain between 2020-2023. Patients who visited community pharmacies to consult or request a medicine for a minor ailment were included. The intervention consisted of a protocol for the minor ailment service and specific protocols for each ailment agreed with general medical practitioners through the SEFAC eXPERT® IT platform and after community pharmacists' training. Patients were followed up 10 days after the consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 430 pharmacies registered 20,987 consultations. 85.2% (n=17,885) were consultations about minor ailments and 14.8% (n=3,102) were requests for specific medications. Minor ailments related to pain (18.7%, n=3,935) were the most frequently consulted. Pharmacists recommended pharmacological treatment to 81.3% (n=17,063) patients and referred 8.0% (n=1,682) patients to a general medical practitioner. 72.4% (n=15,192) of patients responded to follow-up with a symptom resolution of 9.0/10.0, a change in quality of life of +9.0 (0-100 scale) and a satisfaction with the service of 9.6/10.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SIF proved to be both operational and effective, yielding beneficial health outcomes. Its implementation enabled the evaluation of a substantial number of consultations and highlighted the need to encourage the routine documentation of services in community pharmacy practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":40648,"journal":{"name":"Farmaceuticos Comunitarios","volume":"17 3","pages":"17-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12282471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmaceuticos Comunitarios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2025).20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community pharmacy has been promoted internationally for the management of minor ailments with positive results for patients and health care systems. This study evaluates the clinical impact and implementation of a minor ailment service in community pharmacies' daily practice.

Methods: A pragmatic study with a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design was conducted throughout Spain between 2020-2023. Patients who visited community pharmacies to consult or request a medicine for a minor ailment were included. The intervention consisted of a protocol for the minor ailment service and specific protocols for each ailment agreed with general medical practitioners through the SEFAC eXPERT® IT platform and after community pharmacists' training. Patients were followed up 10 days after the consultation.

Results: A total of 430 pharmacies registered 20,987 consultations. 85.2% (n=17,885) were consultations about minor ailments and 14.8% (n=3,102) were requests for specific medications. Minor ailments related to pain (18.7%, n=3,935) were the most frequently consulted. Pharmacists recommended pharmacological treatment to 81.3% (n=17,063) patients and referred 8.0% (n=1,682) patients to a general medical practitioner. 72.4% (n=15,192) of patients responded to follow-up with a symptom resolution of 9.0/10.0, a change in quality of life of +9.0 (0-100 scale) and a satisfaction with the service of 9.6/10.

Conclusions: SIF proved to be both operational and effective, yielding beneficial health outcomes. Its implementation enabled the evaluation of a substantial number of consultations and highlighted the need to encourage the routine documentation of services in community pharmacy practice.

[新药服务中的药物干预]。
背景:社区药房在国际上被推广用于小病的管理,对患者和卫生保健系统都有积极的影响。本研究评估了小病服务在社区药房日常实践中的临床影响和实施情况。方法:在2020-2023年期间,在西班牙进行了一项具有混合有效性-实施设计的语用研究。其中包括到社区药房咨询或要求治疗小病的患者。干预措施包括针对小病服务的协议和针对每种疾病的具体协议,这些协议通过SEFAC eXPERT®IT平台和经过社区药剂师培训后得到全科医生的同意。患者于会诊后10天随访。结果:共有430家药店登记咨询20,987人次。85.2% (n=17,885)为小病问诊,14.8% (n=3,102)为特殊药物问诊。与疼痛相关的小病(18.7%,n= 3935)是最常被咨询的。药剂师向81.3% (n= 17063)患者推荐药物治疗,8.0% (n= 1682)患者转介给全科医生。72.4% (n=15,192)的患者对随访有反应,症状缓解为9.0/10.0,生活质量变化为+9.0(0-100分制),服务满意度为9.6/10。结论:SIF证明既可行又有效,产生了有益的健康结果。它的实施使对大量咨询的评价成为可能,并强调需要鼓励社区药房实践中服务的例行记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Farmaceuticos Comunitarios
Farmaceuticos Comunitarios HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
351
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信