N Amador-Fernández, E L Graham, ShI Benrimoj, E Pérez-Hoyos, V J Baixauli, V Colomer-Molina, O García-Agudo, V García-Cárdenas, M A Gastelurrutia, J Giner-Martínez, R Palomo-Llinares, R Sánchez-Tormo, F Martínez-Martínez
{"title":"[Pharmaceutical interventions in the new medicine service].","authors":"N Amador-Fernández, E L Graham, ShI Benrimoj, E Pérez-Hoyos, V J Baixauli, V Colomer-Molina, O García-Agudo, V García-Cárdenas, M A Gastelurrutia, J Giner-Martínez, R Palomo-Llinares, R Sánchez-Tormo, F Martínez-Martínez","doi":"10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2025).20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community pharmacy has been promoted internationally for the management of minor ailments with positive results for patients and health care systems. This study evaluates the clinical impact and implementation of a minor ailment service in community pharmacies' daily practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pragmatic study with a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design was conducted throughout Spain between 2020-2023. Patients who visited community pharmacies to consult or request a medicine for a minor ailment were included. The intervention consisted of a protocol for the minor ailment service and specific protocols for each ailment agreed with general medical practitioners through the SEFAC eXPERT® IT platform and after community pharmacists' training. Patients were followed up 10 days after the consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 430 pharmacies registered 20,987 consultations. 85.2% (n=17,885) were consultations about minor ailments and 14.8% (n=3,102) were requests for specific medications. Minor ailments related to pain (18.7%, n=3,935) were the most frequently consulted. Pharmacists recommended pharmacological treatment to 81.3% (n=17,063) patients and referred 8.0% (n=1,682) patients to a general medical practitioner. 72.4% (n=15,192) of patients responded to follow-up with a symptom resolution of 9.0/10.0, a change in quality of life of +9.0 (0-100 scale) and a satisfaction with the service of 9.6/10.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SIF proved to be both operational and effective, yielding beneficial health outcomes. Its implementation enabled the evaluation of a substantial number of consultations and highlighted the need to encourage the routine documentation of services in community pharmacy practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":40648,"journal":{"name":"Farmaceuticos Comunitarios","volume":"17 3","pages":"17-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12282471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmaceuticos Comunitarios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2025).20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Community pharmacy has been promoted internationally for the management of minor ailments with positive results for patients and health care systems. This study evaluates the clinical impact and implementation of a minor ailment service in community pharmacies' daily practice.
Methods: A pragmatic study with a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design was conducted throughout Spain between 2020-2023. Patients who visited community pharmacies to consult or request a medicine for a minor ailment were included. The intervention consisted of a protocol for the minor ailment service and specific protocols for each ailment agreed with general medical practitioners through the SEFAC eXPERT® IT platform and after community pharmacists' training. Patients were followed up 10 days after the consultation.
Results: A total of 430 pharmacies registered 20,987 consultations. 85.2% (n=17,885) were consultations about minor ailments and 14.8% (n=3,102) were requests for specific medications. Minor ailments related to pain (18.7%, n=3,935) were the most frequently consulted. Pharmacists recommended pharmacological treatment to 81.3% (n=17,063) patients and referred 8.0% (n=1,682) patients to a general medical practitioner. 72.4% (n=15,192) of patients responded to follow-up with a symptom resolution of 9.0/10.0, a change in quality of life of +9.0 (0-100 scale) and a satisfaction with the service of 9.6/10.
Conclusions: SIF proved to be both operational and effective, yielding beneficial health outcomes. Its implementation enabled the evaluation of a substantial number of consultations and highlighted the need to encourage the routine documentation of services in community pharmacy practice.