Therapeutic efficacy of steroids versus non-steroidal agents in the treatment of oral lichen planus: A randomised control study.

Q3 Medicine
Venkata Ujwala Sahithi Neelathi, Tatapudi Ramesh, Anand Babu Beeraboina, Reddy Sudhakara Reddy, Ravikanth Manyam, Jyothi P Meka
{"title":"Therapeutic efficacy of steroids versus non-steroidal agents in the treatment of oral lichen planus: A randomised control study.","authors":"Venkata Ujwala Sahithi Neelathi, Tatapudi Ramesh, Anand Babu Beeraboina, Reddy Sudhakara Reddy, Ravikanth Manyam, Jyothi P Meka","doi":"10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_298_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the mucous membranes with first-line treatment usually focused on corticosteroids for reducing inflammation and alleviating symptoms. Unfortunately, corticosteroids can carry risks, and with contraindications. When corticosteroids are contraindicated, cannot be tolerated, or need to be replaced due to side effects or some other reason, many different treatment and treatment strategies exist depending on what type of underlying condition is being treated. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of steroid (prednisolone) versus non-steroid agent (dapsone) in patients with oral lichen planus.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty patients, diagnosed histopathologically with OLP, which failed to respond to topical treatments, were included in the study. The selected patients were divided into two groups. Group I (n = 15) received a systemic steroid, Prednisolone 10 mg twice daily, and Group II (n = 15) received a non-steroidal Dapsone 100 mg once daily. Both groups were also prescribed Benzocaine Gel and Benzydamine Mouthwash, and local irritants were removed before administration. The reduction in size of lesion and the intensity of burning sensation were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups demonstrated a substantial degree of remission at the end of their treatment dosages. Both the groups had a positive outcome and similar response rates in terms of reduction in lesion size (group I = 65%; group II = 62%) and reduced pain intensity (group I = 88%; group II = 91%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dapsone can be considered as alternate to steroids; it was equivalent to prednisolone in efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":38846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology","volume":"29 2","pages":"243-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_298_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the mucous membranes with first-line treatment usually focused on corticosteroids for reducing inflammation and alleviating symptoms. Unfortunately, corticosteroids can carry risks, and with contraindications. When corticosteroids are contraindicated, cannot be tolerated, or need to be replaced due to side effects or some other reason, many different treatment and treatment strategies exist depending on what type of underlying condition is being treated. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of steroid (prednisolone) versus non-steroid agent (dapsone) in patients with oral lichen planus.

Materials and methods: Thirty patients, diagnosed histopathologically with OLP, which failed to respond to topical treatments, were included in the study. The selected patients were divided into two groups. Group I (n = 15) received a systemic steroid, Prednisolone 10 mg twice daily, and Group II (n = 15) received a non-steroidal Dapsone 100 mg once daily. Both groups were also prescribed Benzocaine Gel and Benzydamine Mouthwash, and local irritants were removed before administration. The reduction in size of lesion and the intensity of burning sensation were recorded.

Results: The two groups demonstrated a substantial degree of remission at the end of their treatment dosages. Both the groups had a positive outcome and similar response rates in terms of reduction in lesion size (group I = 65%; group II = 62%) and reduced pain intensity (group I = 88%; group II = 91%).

Conclusion: Dapsone can be considered as alternate to steroids; it was equivalent to prednisolone in efficacy.

Abstract Image

类固醇与非类固醇药物治疗口腔扁平苔藓的疗效:一项随机对照研究。
背景和目的:口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)是一种慢性粘膜炎症性疾病,一线治疗通常集中于皮质类固醇以减轻炎症和缓解症状。不幸的是,皮质类固醇有风险,并且有禁忌症。当皮质类固醇是禁忌症,不能耐受,或由于副作用或其他原因需要更换时,根据治疗的潜在疾病类型,存在许多不同的治疗和治疗策略。因此,本研究的目的是比较类固醇(强的松龙)与非类固醇药物(氨苯砜)治疗口腔扁平苔藓患者的疗效。材料与方法:本研究纳入30例经组织病理学诊断为OLP,局部治疗无效的患者。选取的患者分为两组。I组(n = 15)接受全身类固醇,强的松龙10 mg,每日2次,II组(n = 15)接受非甾体氨苯砜100 mg,每日1次。两组患者均给予苯佐卡因凝胶和苄达明漱口水,并在给药前去除局部刺激物。记录病变面积的缩小和烧灼感的强度。结果:两组在治疗结束时均表现出相当程度的缓解。两组在减少病变大小方面均有积极的结果和相似的反应率(组I = 65%;II组= 62%),疼痛强度降低(I组= 88%;II组= 91%)。结论:氨苯砜可作为类固醇的替代用药;其疗效与强的松龙相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology [ISSN:print-(0973-029X, online-1998-393X)] is a tri-annual journal published on behalf of “The Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists” (IAOMP). The publication of JOMFP was started in the year 1993. The journal publishes papers on a wide spectrum of topics associated with the scope of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, also, ensuring scientific merit and quality. It is a comprehensive reading material for the professionals who want to upgrade their diagnostic skills in Oral Diseases; allows exposure to newer topics and methods of research in the Oral-facial Tissues and Pathology. New features allow an open minded thinking and approach to various pathologies. It also encourages authors to showcase quality work done by them and to compile relevant cases which are diagnostically challenging. The Journal takes pride in maintaining the quality of articles and photomicrographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信